Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 9, 2025, 5:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
Says:

No matter that the Democrats’ early history on these issues is barely relevant today. The two parties slowly traded places on racial politics throughout the 20th century, a well-documented historical phenomenon D’Souza considers totally bogus. D’Souza tortures the data to claim simply that this switch never happened.

Presents no data.
<insert profound quote here>
Reply
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
(August 9, 2018 at 4:35 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Says:

No matter that the Democrats’ early history on these issues is barely relevant today. The two parties slowly traded places on racial politics throughout the 20th century, a well-documented historical phenomenon D’Souza considers totally bogus. D’Souza tortures the data to claim simply that this switch never happened.

Presents no data.

To be fair, the discussion about the Democrats is completely beside the point and is a textbook example of whataboutism. Also, I think that it's pretty much common knowledge that the dems stand a little bit to the left than the republicans on social issues such as equality. Now, I may disagree with how they think racism is solved (more black trans woman CEOs instead of addressing the actual roots of institutionalised prejudice), but they're much better than the dog - whistling republicans. Literally a 5 seconds google takes to a very well sourced Wikipedia article that explained this very easily to me, an Italian with really not much knowledge of US politics or history.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

And hell, if you won't take it from me, here it is straight from the horse's (elephant's?) mouth.
https://www.thenation.com/article/exclus...-strategy/

Holy shit
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.

Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped.

Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses.

Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder.

Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."
Reply
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
(August 9, 2018 at 3:34 pm)alpha male Wrote:
(August 9, 2018 at 3:30 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Nothing, if you don't mind or would prefer a racist POTUS, obviously. 

There wasn't a viable alternative, for those of us who actually vote.

It is actually not irresponsible to withhold your vote or vote third party, or even for an opposition candidate when your own party offers you a shit sandwich.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
(August 9, 2018 at 4:35 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Says:

No matter that the Democrats’ early history on these issues is barely relevant today. The two parties slowly traded places on racial politics throughout the 20th century, a well-documented historical phenomenon D’Souza considers totally bogus. D’Souza tortures the data to claim simply that this switch never happened.

Presents no data.

Yeah, you must be right.  Multiple independent authors all coming to the same conclusion must mean they're all pulling the claim out of one collective ass.





Quote:And for a long time the strategy worked. Democratic politicians like Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt loyally upheld white supremacy. The dam began to crack with Harry Truman, and then under Lyndon Johnson the national party decisively broke with this corrupt bargain. With that done, white southerners just took their conservative views on taxes and national security into the Republican Party where such views belonged.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...can/45956/

Quote:In American politics, the Southern strategy was a Republican Party electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the South by appealing to racism against African Americans.[1][2][3] As the civil rights movement and dismantling of Jim Crow laws in the 1950s and 1960s visibly deepened existing racial tensions in much of the Southern United States, Republican politicians such as presidential candidate Richard Nixon and Senator Barry Goldwater developed strategies that successfully contributed to the political realignment of many white, conservative voters in the South that had traditionally supported the Democratic Party to the Republican Party.[4] It also helped push the Republican Party much more to the right.[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

Quote:The night that Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, his special assistant Bill Moyers was surprised to find the president looking melancholy in his bedroom. Moyers later wrote that when he asked what was wrong, Johnson replied, “I think we just delivered the South to the Republican party for a long time to come.”

It may seem a crude remark to make after such a momentous occasion, but it was also an accurate prediction.

https://www.history.com/news/how-the-par...atic-south

Quote:Strangely, over a century, America's two major political parties gradually reversed identities, like the magnetic poles of Planet Earth switching direction.

How Democrats and Republicans switched beliefs

Quote:The South was once home to the "yellow dog Democrat" who would vote for a mutt over someone from the party of Abraham Lincoln. Now, the party of the Great Emancipator has made Dixie its bedrock, the base of its Electoral College vote and its majorities in Congress. Many a great-granddaddy buried in rebel gray has been rolling over in his grave for some years now.

The South's rejection of its Democratic DNA began more than 60 years ago with a Supreme Court decision, and significant historic milestones have followed like clockwork in almost every decade since. (The one exception was the 1970s, when Watergate torpedoed the Nixon presidency and led to the election of Jimmy Carter in 1976.)

https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolit...an-redoubt
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
Again, the party of the Confederacy doesn't get to claim party of Lincoln. Lincoln was the enemy of the confederacy. Either you agree that confederate statues should be removed, or you're NOT the party of Lincoln. Pretty simple fucking stuff really.
"Tradition" is just a word people use to make themselves feel better about being an asshole.
Reply
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
It seems to me, that whatarty did what a long long time ago has little bearing on whether personal harassment of public figures is acceptable.

One distinction that I think is important, is that it seems that some think this means that you can’t criticize or speak out against someone. I don’t think this was the spirit of the OP was about, But rather going to people homes, mobbing them in public, or disrupting them at dinner or a movie. That we can have a civilized (even if heated) discussion about issues, without the crazy and hatred.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man.  - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire.  - Martin Luther
Reply
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
Yeah, like..if people were hanging and burning a president in effigy a couple years ago..that's neither here nor there.  Everyone..today...should shut their face and know their place so that we can have RR approved conversations of a tolerable heat level!!!

Stahp...fuckin snowflake.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/0e/d0/9a/0ed09...c588bd.jpg

Yup because those black men because their a group of sycophants and ideological puppets .Next Right Wingers seem to live under this notion that racists can't like or associate with certain members of that race and still not be racists. That's like saying a misogynist who loves his female relatives is not a misogynist. Sorry racists are not one dimensional cartoon villians.

Quote:Nope. Responsible citizens step up and choose, even if the choice is between two evils.
Nope because choosing evil is still choosing evil

Quote:Bye-bye troll who's too much of a pussy to even vote.
Yes damn him for not choosing evil  Dodgy

[Image: 0497042a61f7d6fe6357dcaa11364cdb.jpg]
Because she  deserved no criticism on her character at all  
[Image: sanctions.jpg]


[Image: Pg-26-sinking-reu.jpg?w968]
Thatcher beside her best buddy Pinochet

Quote:Wow! I've noticed and inverse relationship to the number of facts I present in my posts, along with links to sources, and the seriousness of the replies. You guys should try using facts for a change instead of baseless one-line assertions.
In other words you losing and your lashing out in dismissive  snark
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
(August 9, 2018 at 6:02 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Yeah, like..if people were hanging and burning a president in effigy a couple years ago..that's neither here nor there.  Everyone..today...should shut their face and know their place so that we can have RR approved conversations of a tolerable heat level. 

I didn’t say that, nor do I approve of it.... do you think that was acceptable behavior?  It would seem that if you are are saying that is bad, then it would follow that it is now as well.

Edit: I also don’t think this is addressing the issue in the OP, although if this type of thing is becoming acceptable, is certainly a related issue.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man.  - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire.  - Martin Luther
Reply
RE: Is Harassment of Public Figures Acceptable: Your Sincere Opinion
You don't seem to say much of anything, no matter how many posts you make.  It's a really neat trick.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Face coverings in public banned Silver 10 1095 March 10, 2021 at 6:13 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Secular Spirituality in Public Schools chimp3 12 1249 January 23, 2020 at 4:37 am
Last Post: Sal
  The unvaccinated banned from public. brewer 4 576 March 26, 2019 at 9:55 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Saudi Arabia: Reports of torture and sexual harassment of detained activists WinterHold 0 285 January 27, 2019 at 4:56 am
Last Post: WinterHold
  This Figures.... Minimalist 2 505 September 10, 2018 at 11:29 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  And this figures, too Minimalist 0 371 September 10, 2018 at 6:16 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Sexual Harassment Plagues Canadian Parliament And Senate Amarok 1 809 February 2, 2018 at 7:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Iowa bill for bible class in public school brewer 20 3810 January 27, 2018 at 2:48 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Your opinion of "mental defect" in law..... Brian37 9 1936 November 17, 2017 at 1:44 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Another Kentucky Public Official Who Doesn't Know the Law Crossless2.0 11 2628 July 15, 2016 at 8:12 am
Last Post: Little lunch



Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)