I wonder how many times the same questions are going to be asked until it is learned that the answers don't really mean squat.

(November 15, 2018 at 11:12 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Offs.  You're officially back now and done pretending to be a woman?

Yeah it's interesting how you never see both together in the same room at the same time. Almost like a superhero!

(November 15, 2018 at 6:04 pm)Cathooloo Wrote: O noes, I had successfully avoided posting in this trainwreck of a thread for all this time.

UNCLEAN!

---

(November 15, 2018 at 8:15 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Hahahahaha, fuckin idiots don't know they're idiots. That will never not be funny.

His followers being seen as idiots was part of the designer's design because fallenness, something the designer does quite a lot when He is deep into his cups.

---

(November 15, 2018 at 9:33 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(November 15, 2018 at 9:29 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Except the parts which "fell" ... when Adam "fell" .... how exactly can you tell the difference. 
Pretty piss-poor design, if things are so poorly made they fall when someone else falls. 

What a bunch of rubbish.

Not sure what you are getting at.  Things are not piss poor designed.  Things are fine-tuned and irreducibly complex.

So you're saying piss poor is what he was going for?  Well he definitely nailed it then.  Stuck the landing!

---

(November 15, 2018 at 9:37 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(November 15, 2018 at 9:36 pm)no one Wrote: There wasn't any fall. If your lord is a know it all, as you claim, It knew it would happen from moment one. There is no getting around that. Your lord is just a plain douche!

No, there are times where He chooses to step back and see what happens.  For instance, He let Adam name the animals.

Really?  Which language represents Adam's work?

(November 16, 2018 at 1:46 am)CDF47 Wrote: Why lock the thread?

Because you have nothing. 
ID is universally regarded as pseudo-science by real scientists. 
You can't define what "complexity" is, in a meaningful way that captures what it is, and WHAT IT IS NOT. 
Repeating your unfounded faith assertions is a waste of time.

(November 16, 2018 at 10:06 am)Bucky Ball Wrote:

(November 16, 2018 at 1:46 am)CDF47 Wrote: Why lock the thread?

Because you have nothing. 
ID is universally regarded as pseudo-science by real scientists. 
You can't define what "complexity" is, in a meaningful way that captures what it is, and WHAT IT IS NOT. 
Repeating your unfounded faith assertions is a waste of time.

And yet, here you are, wasting it...

I'd given up with the thread until CDF47 created a sock and I thought there was someone else. =

(November 15, 2018 at 1:35 am)Everena Wrote:  And what I have to say about the post is, first, I appreciate you finding and posting that for me. However, it is not evidence of one species turning into an entirely different species and all anyone can produce is plants and a germ and I do not find that convincing

Yes, it is. All you have done here is to demonstrate your ignorance of a valid genetic study and, in all probability, genetics in general. Denial on your part does not constitute a counterargument.

(November 16, 2018 at 7:19 am)Mathilda Wrote:

(November 15, 2018 at 11:12 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Offs.  You're officially back now and done pretending to be a woman?

Yeah it's interesting how you never see both together in the same room at the same time. Almost like a superhero!

If she is indeed his sock, then it bespeaks of an interesting cognitive disfunction or psychological pathology for him to imagine the fatal short comings of his “arguments” has not been that they were based on assertion, demonstrate ignorance of well established scientific understanding, and ignore sound approach to fact finding, and embrace pseudoscience junk,  but instead has all along been that the poser of his “arguments” didn’t wear the persona of a conceited argumentative bitch.   Maybe he was just going about the typical Christian path of prosthelytizing:  put on whatever smoke and Missouri, bullshit song and dance it takes so long as it pack in the gullible.  Or maybe its more specifically imitative of the Fox News path to credibility: put on a stridently partisan woman’s face.

Everena, do you have a soulmate?

(November 16, 2018 at 10:36 am)purplepurpose Wrote: Everena, do you have a soulmate?

She answered that question already.  She said her soulmate was god.