Quote:Okay, well I'm just going to assume you have no examples since I've given you multiple opportunities and you've come up with none,

Your free to assume what you like it changes nothing 

Quote:and I'm not going to wait indefinitely for you to validate your claims against me.

There already soundly validated and your claims are rationally refuted 

Quote:If you want to keep telling yourself that I was trying to trick you in some way, then so be it.

Nothing to do with me everything to do with you 

Quote:I can't control your mind, nor do I have any desire to.

Fair enough 

So summed up I have refuted you

(December 18, 2018 at 8:20 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:

(December 18, 2018 at 8:09 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Historical sites, encylopedias, dictionaries, or educational sites imagining that the soviet apparatus did anything due to the non existent tenants of atheism?  GL with that nonsense.

You're still stumbling over the fact that atheism concerns one's state of belief.  

Do you understand?

Your atheism does. There are multiple definitions that are different than yours.  Why should I apply yours?  Give me a reason to besides "I said so" and I will consider it.

At this point I'm trying to be friendly about this, but I'm not going to change my position because you want me to.   Also, if your definition is "the one" then you shouldn't have any trouble finding an unbiased educational source that states the same definition.  If you do that and it confirms your view, I'll agree with you all day long.

You aren't trying to be anything but wrong.  Atheism still, and has since the beginning of our interactions, concerned the state of one's belief in gods.

Do you understand?

The irony is that your dumb ass -has- had the links you're requesting posted. Imagine the show we've been treated to while you babble away like a moron, as oblivious to that fact as you are to the one stated for the umpteenth time, above.

(December 18, 2018 at 8:47 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote:

(December 18, 2018 at 8:20 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Your atheism does. There are multiple definitions that are different than yours.  Why should I apply yours?  Give me a reason to besides "I said so" and I will consider it.

At this point I'm trying to be friendly about this, but I'm not going to change my position because you want me to.   Also, if your definition is "the one" then you shouldn't have any trouble finding an unbiased educational source that states the same definition.  If you do that and it confirms your view, I'll agree with you all day long.

You aren't trying to be anything but wrong.  Atheism still, and has since the beginning of our interactions, concerned the state of one's belief in gods.

Do you understand?

I do not accept your definition as a broad definition.  I won't deviate from that position today, tomorrow, the next day, next week, next month.  But you have the right to define it as such for yourself or anybody who willfully accepts it as the definition.

Your acceptance is irrelevant.  I'm sure that you'd refuse to accept a great many things.  It nevertheless remains a fact that atheism concerns one's state of belief in gods. Are you retracting your previous retraction, above..and re-indicating your desire to remain wrong for all of eternity?

Do you understand?

(December 18, 2018 at 8:52 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Your acceptance is irrelevant.  I'm sure that you'd refuse to accept a great many things.  It nevertheless remains a fact that atheism concerns one's state of belief in gods.

Do you understand?

Then why do you keep asking?  Do you honestly believe I'm going to change my answer?

I'll accept anything you can validate with proper citation and can demonstrate that the source has defined or described the subject(s) without bias.

Here's a question you might want to start asking yourself, someday, Max.

Who could have cared for you so little..or in fact hated you so very much...that they would have miseducated you in such a comprehensive way as to be uinable to tell the difference between leninism, the soviet apparatus, humanism, secularism, and atheism?

---

(December 18, 2018 at 8:55 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:

(December 18, 2018 at 8:52 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Your acceptance is irrelevant.  I'm sure that you'd refuse to accept a great many things.  It nevertheless remains a fact that atheism concerns one's state of belief in gods.

Do you understand?

Then why do you keep asking?  Do you honestly believe I'm going to change my answer?

Not sure..you've indicated that you will never change your answer..that you could change your answer so as to be less of a nutball, but here again that you will never change you answer.  It seems like that's another question you might want to ask yourself..because you don;t seem to know your own mind on that from one moment to the next.

Quote:I'll accept anything you can validate with proper citation and can demonstrate that the source has defined or described the subject(s) without bias.

...and there we go again!

You've already been provided with this information, which is why it's been so much fun to watch you bullshit us, and yourself..these many pages.

As ever, atheism...concerns one's state of belief in gods.

Do you understand?

(December 18, 2018 at 8:57 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Here's a question you might want to start asking yourself, someday, Max.

Who could have cared for you so little..or in fact hated you so very much...that they would have miseducated you in such a comprehensive way as to be uinable to tell the difference between leninism, the soviet apparatus, humanism, secularism, and atheism?

---

(December 18, 2018 at 8:55 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Then why do you keep asking?  Do you honestly believe I'm going to change my answer?

Not sure..you've indicated that you will never change your answer..that you could change your answer so as to be less of a nutball, but here again that you will never change you answer.  It seems like that's another question you might want to ask yourself..because you don;t seem to know your own mind on that from one moment to the next.

Quote:I'll accept anything you can validate with proper citation and can demonstrate that the source has defined or described the subject(s) without bias.

...and there we go again!

You've already been provided with this information, which is why it's been so much fun to watch you bullshit us, and yourself..these many pages.

As ever, atheism...concerns one's state of belief in gods.

Do you understand?

No and he never will his answer will forever be . That's just your definition not the broad one . Of course that's rubbish

(December 18, 2018 at 8:57 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Here's a question you might want to start asking yourself, someday, Max.

Who could have cared for you so little..or in fact hated you so very much...that they would have miseducated you in such a comprehensive way as to be uinable to tell the difference between leninism, the soviet apparatus, and atheism?

Why humor a question that asserts a logical fallacy?

Here's a question for you though.  Can you name one institute, organization, or academy devoted to higher education that adheres to a position that would suggest I should accept your definition on the basis of science, logic, or speech and without bias?  If so, I would appreciate a link to their web page that mentions that standard so I can considerate it in light of your definition.

Quote:Here's a question for you though.  Can you name one institute, organization, or academy devoted to higher education that adheres to a position that would suggest I should accept your definition on the basis of science, logic, or speech and without bias?  If so, I would appreciate a link to their web page that mentions that standard so I can considerate it in light of your definition.

So blah blah blah blah

(December 18, 2018 at 9:09 pm)Amarok Wrote: Here's a question for you though.  Can you name one institute, organization, or academy devoted to higher education that adheres to a position that would suggest I should accept your definition on the basis of science, logic, or speech and without bias?  If so, I would appreciate a link to their web page that mentions that standard so I can considerate it in light of your definition.

So blah blah blah blah

Yes, but I'll wait for his answer.