Drich. He is the reincarnation of Job (didI get ghe character right?), had all the shit on the world throwed at him. Got AIDS, Cancer etc, now has been molested.

There is nothing that hasn't afflicted him

---

(May 9, 2019 at 7:19 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: You are even more twisted than I had previously thought.

Try to do a read on his threads. You might find thst this latest, isn't even the worst. Search his threads on the profile. If you are willing to feel brain pain, OFC. Heh, look for "spare the rod, spoil the child" i hope he never fathers children.

(May 10, 2019 at 7:38 am)LastPoet Wrote: Drich. He is the reincarnation of Job (didI get ghe character right?), had all the shit on the world throwed at him. Got AIDS, Cancer etc, now has been molested.

There is nothing that hasn't afflicted him

---

(May 9, 2019 at 7:19 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: You are even more twisted than I had previously thought.

Try to do a read on his threads. You might find thst this latest, isn't even the worst. Search his threads on the profile. If you are willing to feel brain pain, OFC. Heh, look for "spare the rod, spoil the child" i hope he never fathers children.

Ive shared this several times where have you been?

---

Again morons I am not condoning rape, it is not "fun". I am simply questioning it's position on the pop morality scale giving how dependant human survival as a species depended on rape to ensure bio diversity in the genepool. I honestly think the only reason you all see it so badly is because it is not fun for both people. if it where then it would be dismissed.

Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

If 1/2 of you where honest 1/2 of you would say no. why? because rape/child molesting is not the issue, if it where then all form of sexually deviant behavior that could technically be defined as rape should get the max penalty.

If you said No you are not concerned with rape but concerned on how one 'feels' about sex with a given person.

Next scenario, lets say an older married couple have sex once or twice a week and it's" goodie bag night" but the wife is just not into it tonight for whatever reason. she explains this to her husband but he has already "taken the blue pill and wants to see how far the rabbit hole goes." ( a matrix quote nasto) so her 'feelings or want to abstain for a night go unheard and dude on his 'blue pill powers' drills wifie in the can for an hour. Or better yet let's say wifie is a light touch and she is done in 5 mins, and wants out... but dude on the blue pill is a 1 or 2 hour guy. Again she's done, and wants out but has to be hammered for another hour and 55 mins before the blue pill runs out and he is done.

Now according to your screw up pop morality which scenario is worse? two kids having consentual sex or a married couple having "taking one for the team sex?" Remember the husband and wife is not technically rape but at the same time the wife is having sex she does not really want twice a week till he gives out. and the kids no matter how much they want it, it is technically rape.

(May 10, 2019 at 9:50 am)Drich Wrote:

---

 
Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

 

Your drivel is technically raping my senses. 

But OK I will return with an assinie anology 

If someone gave a child heroin and the child was happy about it, is that OK?

Its not just about the immediate act, but how it effects the victims whole life 

(May 9, 2019 at 2:27 pm)zebo-the-fat Wrote: Church of England child sex abuse allegations 'marked by secrecy'

The Church of England's response to child sex abuse allegations was "marked by secrecy", a report has found.
Former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord George Carey has been criticised for supporting former Bishop Peter Ball.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) said Ball "was able to sexually abuse vulnerable teenagers and young men for decades".

The IICSA described the "appalling sexual abuse against children" in the Diocese of Chichester, with 18 members of the clergy convicted of offences during a 50-year period.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-48214957



Funny how an "all seeing, all knowing, loving god" didn't bother to stop any of it!

To be fair to the cosmic sky hero, he also didn't stop the Holocaust. WW2 cost 50 million lives worldwide, not just 6 million Jews.

(May 9, 2019 at 3:46 pm)Drich Wrote: in a similar way Rape is bad like forcing poop into someone is bad, but it is not the end of the friggin world. 

In truth if there was no rape humanity would have died of as a bunch of inbred blue blooded monkeys long time ago. Rape is the reason we all don't belong to a hand full of inbred clans. Yes rape is bad M'kay Rape is bad.. but so is pooping in someone's mouth 

(May 10, 2019 at 9:50 am)Drich Wrote: Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

What a vile piece of shit you are. If thats what religion makes out of people i am glad not to be religious and hope never to be.

(May 10, 2019 at 11:45 am)madog Wrote:

(May 10, 2019 at 9:50 am)Drich Wrote:

---

 
Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

 

Your drivel is technically raping my senses. 

But OK I will return with an assinie anology 

If someone gave a child heroin and the child was happy about it, is that OK?

Its not just about the immediate act, but how it effects the victims whole life 

I asked you the question first. answer me and I will gladly show you where/when giving a child 'herion' is a good thing. Truly good even by your f-ed pop morality view.

but you have to honestly answer me first.

(May 10, 2019 at 12:04 pm)Drich Wrote:

(May 10, 2019 at 11:45 am)madog Wrote: Your drivel is technically raping my senses. 

But OK I will return with an assinie anology 

If someone gave a child heroin and the child was happy about it, is that OK?

Its not just about the immediate act, but how it effects the victims whole life 

I asked you the question first. answer me and I will gladly show you where/when giving a child 'herion' is a good thing. Truly good even by your f-ed pop morality view.

but you have to honestly answer me first.

 I answered you, you just chose to ignore the answer   

"Its not just about the immediate act, but how it effects the victims whole life "

(May 10, 2019 at 11:53 am)Brian37 Wrote:

(May 9, 2019 at 2:27 pm)zebo-the-fat Wrote: Church of England child sex abuse allegations 'marked by secrecy'

The Church of England's response to child sex abuse allegations was "marked by secrecy", a report has found.
Former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord George Carey has been criticised for supporting former Bishop Peter Ball.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) said Ball "was able to sexually abuse vulnerable teenagers and young men for decades".

The IICSA described the "appalling sexual abuse against children" in the Diocese of Chichester, with 18 members of the clergy convicted of offences during a 50-year period.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-48214957



Funny how an "all seeing, all knowing, loving god" didn't bother to stop any of it!

To be fair to the cosmic sky hero, he also didn't stop the Holocaust. WW2 cost 50 million lives worldwide, not just 6 million Jews.

hey smokey.. what do you think the world population would be if there was no war no dease? no unnatural but only 100 year old deaths?

Then tell me how many thousands of years ago this planet resources would be 100% depleted and we a virus like species made this planet look like the surface of mars as we cnsumed everything the planet could offer an yet 100 trillion of us die of starvation...

I bet God would just as soon have you thank him for war and disease so you hippy no vaccine useing douche bags don't have to decide which one of your kids you will eat first and which of the kids gets to have soup made from the bones of the last one you had to kill and eat and which ones won't get any and will be next.

Do you people even think before you speak? do any of you look beyond tomorrow?

Yes 50 to 100 million died this pat century in wars.. that said we are still 7 billion and expanding on a finite planet with finite resources.

If you where smart you's better pray for a war or a thanos or something before we reach a point where the planet can not recover. as there is a tipping point where we consume so much what is left will not be enough to replenish what we have taken and that part of the planet will simply be lost for ever. Example great barrier reef is past the point of recovery it is said much of it is already dead.

(May 9, 2019 at 7:19 pm)arewethereyet Wrote:

(May 9, 2019 at 3:46 pm)Drich Wrote: what if you lived in a world where the worst thing in the world that can happen is when someone pee'd on you? or if you lived in a place where the worst thing in the world is someone pooped and smashed it in your face? No murder rape not possible we where pretty well indestructible, but piss was still piss and poop was still poop.

It would then stand to reason these personal assaults would become our rape and murder.. think of how much we would blow this all up to where the psycological damage of having poop jamed in your face and or mouth could mentally change you forever. to the point where because this is the worst thing that could happen it would require the same type of criminal punishment why? because again it is the biggest humiliation we being could endure!

Now lets say preist where pooping and forcing these same kids to eat it. Would your response be the same?

 yes of course it would because you do not have a point of reference that depicts anything worse.

Look I get it.. I was "manhandled by several different people as a young boy. family friends of family strangers ina park.. Apparently a was a damn hot little bastard that man woman and teen found very attractive. it is a bad thing and I was mad for a long time. but hear me out. because you do not know of anything worse this triffle becomes the ultimate crime. and because it is a big deal to us... we want it to be a big deal to god. Just like if poop from another man is forced into your mouth.. the same status the same level of violation is what you would want to apply to mouth pooping if there was no rape.

In truth, on God's level "we" are indestructible. our souls our tue selfs can not be harmed only emotionally violated which from experience is as bad as you want it to be. just like if I where to make you eat poop. in a similar way Rape is bad like forcing poop into someone is bad, but it is not the end of the friggin world. 

In truth if there was no rape humanity would have died of as a bunch of inbred blue blooded monkeys long time ago. Rape is the reason we all don't belong to a hand full of inbred clans. Yes rape is bad M'kay Rape is bad.. but so is pooping in someone's mouth 

---

but at the same time do you demand God move heaven and earth so none of us will ever know what another man's turd will taste like?


It's like captain marvel leaving after they killed thanos the first time and left the remaining avengers to figure out earth bid-ness on their own. (she left because there was no real threat to humanity left) Rape is monkey/humanity bid-ness. meaning it may be world ending to the monkey being drilled in the can... but in truth we aren't monkeys, we are not this flesh, and to only seek protection to the flesh is self defeating when our eternal being our indstructible rape proof souls are being condemned for the sake of our monkey powered frames.

You are even more twisted than I had previously thought.

Yep, I agree.

 @Drich     You don't know shit about the REAL causes of rape in humans, and none of it has to do with fictional sky heros.

Rape isn't because of some cosmic battle between a sky hero and a ground troll making bets over the neurons in a perp's brain. 

Rape is a psychological need for the perp to force control over another human being. Most humans DON'T rape because most of us have EMPATHY for others. Rape in a perp can be because they can be mentally or physically abused as children, and grow up to abuse themselves. Or they can simply be sociopaths whose brains never grew with empathy. Your old book of mythology is not a scientific field like psychiatry or psychology and doesn't explain a damned thing as to why humans do good or bad.

---

AND NO DRICH, humans are NOT indestructible. Humans are quite fragile, even the most rambo gung ho humans get old and die, and can even be killed by a deadly bacteria, or virus, or tornado or tsunami. And if a meteor hit us, like the one that killed the dinos 65 million years ago, our species would be one that would have little to no chance of surviving such an event.

(May 10, 2019 at 12:03 pm)Deesse23 Wrote:

(May 9, 2019 at 3:46 pm)Drich Wrote: in a similar way Rape is bad like forcing poop into someone is bad, but it is not the end of the friggin world. 

In truth if there was no rape humanity would have died of as a bunch of inbred blue blooded monkeys long time ago. Rape is the reason we all don't belong to a hand full of inbred clans. Yes rape is bad M'kay Rape is bad.. but so is pooping in someone's mouth 

(May 10, 2019 at 9:50 am)Drich Wrote: Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

What a vile piece of shit you are. If thats what religion makes out of people i am glad not to be religious and hope never to be.

what a douche..

You: Unga bunga (caveman sounds) me no like what drich say, but me not know how to say it.. Me know Him religionous, so me make him look bad by showing me better than relionous..

Hey retard.. what religion do you think it is I am quoting? then what makes you think I am religious? or do you not understand the term as it is properly used and defined?

nothing I said has any religious implication to it.

It is simply a matter of perspective. meaning just because you think something is end of the world bad, someone else may see it for what it is. yes a bad thing but not end of the world/life as we know it. Meaning it is a thing we can manage ourselves. it is not a species ending event.

Then I pointed out if not for rape life as we know it literally would not exist. google it dummy. it is a fact of history, rape is at the core of our bio diversity. It is why homosapeians took over the world from neanderthals.

---

(May 10, 2019 at 12:09 pm)madog Wrote:

(May 10, 2019 at 12:04 pm)Drich Wrote: I asked you the question first. answer me and I will gladly show you where/when giving a child 'herion' is a good thing. Truly good even by your f-ed pop morality view.

but you have to honestly answer me first.

 I answered you, you just chose to ignore the answer   

"Its not just about the immediate act, but how it effects the victims whole life "

  and I answer you, and you chose to answer you, but not in the way you where asking for a answer.. sound familiar?
Quid pro quoe sport quid pro quoe.

---

(May 10, 2019 at 12:20 pm)Brian37 Wrote:

(May 9, 2019 at 7:19 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: You are even more twisted than I had previously thought.

Yep, I agree.

 @Drich     You don't know shit about the REAL causes of rape in humans, and none of it has to do with fictional sky heros.

Rape isn't because of some cosmic battle between a sky hero and a ground troll making bets over the neurons in a perp's brain. 

Rape is a psychological need for the perp to force control over another human being. Most humans DON'T rape because most of us have EMPATHY for others. Rape in a perp can be because they can be mentally or physically abused as children, and grow up to abuse themselves. Or they can simply be sociopaths whose brains never grew with empathy. Your old book of mythology is not a scientific field like psychiatry or psychology and doesn't explain a damned thing as to why humans do good or bad.

---

AND NO DRICH, humans are NOT indestructible. Humans are quite fragile, even the most rambo gung ho humans get old and die, and can even be killed by a deadly bacteria, or virus, or tornado or tsunami. And if a meteor hit us, like the one that killed the dinos 65 million years ago, our species would be one that would have little to no chance of surviving such an event.

maybe you want to take a run at what I actually said next time sport maybe then we can have a discussion.. other wise no you are wrong obama was the worst president we ever had, he was indeed a racist who intention sown mistrust and anger into our black commmunities to make a white republican president look all the more unapealing and hope to spur a reaction at the polls similar to his own turn out for clinton.. but infact it all back fired.

Do you get it?

I am not responding to anything you actually said.. I am responding to what I think you would have said despite your actual writen words... Just like none of the BS you said had ANYTHING to do with any point I made..

Maybe you should slow down and READ what I had to say before you go off half cockednext time!

1) Never once mention the cause of rape.
2) never once said it was a battle between good and evil, in fact that is theoppsite of what I have said.
3) Never mention a 'perp.'
4) Don't care why people rape, was never part of the discussion ever.
5) Never said humans are indestructible Never. 

And finally point 6 look at all the lying and mis representing my discussion you had to do to try and take the 'moral high road' with me.. If I where trying wrong then why the need to completely change the narrative? Why did you feel the need to lie about my position? did you nt read it or could you not come up with points to counter what I truly said?