Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 3, 2024, 7:20 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Not just catholics!
#71
RE: Not just catholics!
(May 21, 2019 at 8:56 pm)madog Wrote:
(May 21, 2019 at 3:15 pm)Drich Wrote: not the only question I asked you pos I asked a series of 6 questions   


I choose what I answer  .... If you don't want people to answer your questions don't fucking ask  Dodgy

Hey STUPID

"If you choose to answer what you want to answer" IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT QUESTIONS I ASK!!!

Are you so stupid as to not see that as the whole problem I am pointing out?

I ask ABC you provide answers to questions 123. I say, that's not what I asked I asked ABC, you repeat answer 123. that my foolish friend is a straw man fallacy! where you create your own version of what I said and address your own questions. 

You want to ask your own questions fine, but do not pretend they are mine. from now on I will simply identify your straw men and move on I m done trying to help belergently stupid people. (people so dumb, when they do not understand they assume the fault lies with the other person, rather than identify their own ignorance. Or in your case try and change the subject to something you can understand/lowering the bar in an attempt to speak on a subject clearly over your head. which is why "you answer what you want to answer." Rather than answer the questions asks openly and honestly.

Quote:You may not think an adult fucking a child is rape  ... I do  ... and the law is on my side ...
the above statement is another straw man fallacy. As I never once ask if an adult raping a child was rape. That subject was never part of any discussion and I never even questioned the legality. which again only shows you trying to lower the bar of this discussion so you have something to say. as clearly you lack the general intellect to respond to the question I asked. Don't feel bad you are not alone. your kind of people are generally dishonest this way and you are not the first to pretend to answer questions but in fact "are answering the questions you want to answer."
Reply
#72
RE: Not just catholics!
(May 23, 2019 at 9:27 am)Drich Wrote: the above statement is another straw man fallacy. As I never once ask if an adult raping a child was rape. That subject was never part of any discussion and I never even questioned the legality.

(May 10, 2019 at 9:50 am)Drich Wrote: Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

What else than a child do you consider a 10y old boy to be?
Do you think 10y old boys should be able to decide to have sex or not?
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
#73
RE: Not just catholics!
(May 23, 2019 at 11:06 am)Deesse23 Wrote:
(May 23, 2019 at 9:27 am)Drich Wrote: the above statement is another straw man fallacy. As I never once ask if an adult raping a child was rape. That subject was never part of any discussion and I never even questioned the legality.

(May 10, 2019 at 9:50 am)Drich Wrote: Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

What else than a child do you consider a 10y old boy to be?
Do you think 10y old boys should be able to decide to have sex or not?

what do you consider an adult to be? because my senerio place two under age children deciding to have sex.

That is what is wrong with you monsters. you try and seek out your own deviant traits and assign them to me or what I said. 

why in the wrld would you assume the 10 year old is having sex with an adult unless that is the only way you can see it happening.. which again is something you brought to the discussion.

My scenario had one child marginally older than the other and STILL YOU F-ING MORON I IDENTIFIED IT AS RAPE, AND THEN ASKED, SHOULD THE OLDER CHILD BE PROSECUTED AS AN ADULT!!!!

Do you get it?!?!? the rape was never in question from the beginning! That is a produce of another one of your sexually deviant peers who can not see or answer the scenario I provided but invented his own so he could involve himself without having to think outside of the box he was comfortable in!.

The question was always should the older child in this case a girl be made a sex offender/child predator for the rest of her life! on top of a prision sentence!!! not is a 10 year old having sex rape.
Reply
#74
RE: Not just catholics!
Just answer my question please. Nice try, but no derailing, please.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
#75
RE: Not just catholics!
(May 23, 2019 at 12:16 pm)Deesse23 Wrote: Just answer my question please. Nice try, but no derailing, please.

hey dumb fuck the question is asked and answered READ the last post I made!!!
Reply
#76
RE: Not just catholics!
(May 23, 2019 at 1:09 pm)Drich Wrote:
(May 23, 2019 at 12:16 pm)Deesse23 Wrote: Just answer my question please. Nice try, but no derailing, please.

hey dumb fuck the question is asked and answered READ the last post I made!!!

So you think 10y old childs should be allowed to decide to have sex?
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
#77
RE: Not just catholics!
READ POST 73 READ IT DuMMY!!!

(May 23, 2019 at 11:58 am)Drich Wrote:
(May 23, 2019 at 11:06 am)Deesse23 Wrote: What else than a child do you consider a 10y old boy to be?
Do you think 10y old boys should be able to decide to have sex or not?

what do you consider an adult to be? because my senerio place two under age children deciding to have sex.

That is what is wrong with you monsters. you try and seek out your own deviant traits and assign them to me or what I said. 

why in the wrld would you assume the 10 year old is having sex with an adult unless that is the only way you can see it happening.. which again is something you brought to the discussion.

My scenario had one child marginally older than the other and STILL YOU F-ING MORON I IDENTIFIED IT AS RAPE, AND THEN ASKED, SHOULD THE OLDER CHILD BE PROSECUTED AS AN ADULT!!!!

Do you get it?!?!? the rape was never in question from the beginning! That is a produce of another one of your sexually deviant peers who can not see or answer the scenario I provided but invented his own so he could involve himself without having to think outside of the box he was comfortable in!.

The question was always should the older child in this case a girl be made a sex offender/child predator for the rest of her life! on top of a prision sentence!!! not is a 10 year old having sex rape.

did you see it maybe read the above version if you are too stupid to catch it on your own...
Reply
#78
RE: Not just catholics!
(May 23, 2019 at 1:17 pm)Drich Wrote: My scenario had one child marginally older than the other and STILL YOU F-ING MORON I IDENTIFIED IT AS RAPE, AND THEN ASKED, SHOULD THE OLDER CHILD BE PROSECUTED AS AN ADULT!!!!
Show me where i did that. Right, you cant, because i didnt.

(May 23, 2019 at 1:17 pm)Drich Wrote: Do you get it?!?!? the rape was never in question from the beginning! That is a produce of another one of your sexually deviant peers who can not see or answer the scenario I provided but invented his own so he could involve himself without having to think outside of the box he was comfortable in!.
Show me where i talked about rape in this thread. Right, you cant, because i didnt.

(May 23, 2019 at 1:17 pm)Drich Wrote: The question was always should the older child in this case a girl be made a sex offender/child predator for the rest of her life!....
Possibly a question from someone, to someone else. However not from me to you.


What i asked you, and what you havent answered yet is:
Quote:Do you think 10y old boys should be allowed to decide to have sex or not?
Do you?
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
#79
RE: Not just catholics!
(May 23, 2019 at 11:58 am)Drich Wrote: what do you consider an adult to be? because my senerio place two under age children deciding to have sex.

 

A 17 year old is an adult  ... 10 year olds, regardless of how mature you think they are, are children ... simple  Dodgy

As regards sentencing, that is decided by looking at all the circumstances ...
Religion is the top shelf of the supernatural supermarket ... Madog
Reply
#80
RE: Not just catholics!
(May 23, 2019 at 1:40 pm)Deesse23 Wrote:
(May 23, 2019 at 1:17 pm)Drich Wrote: My scenario had one child marginally older than the other and STILL YOU F-ING MORON I IDENTIFIED IT AS RAPE, AND THEN ASKED, SHOULD THE OLDER CHILD BE PROSECUTED AS AN ADULT!!!!
Show me where i did that. Right, you cant, because i didnt.
is your family stupid as well or did it just come from your mother side? maybe your father's or where you dropped from a very high place onto your head which prevents you from basic comprehension outside of goes on in your damaged head?

Now take a moment and feel the burn of me insulting you and or yourfamily/who's ever is at fault for your general stupidity... sunk in yet? feel outraged? take a few more moments, think of all the things you mother or father did to make you like you are, and 3... 2... 1... you should be at least alittle toasty.. Now push it all down an get ready to move on, Now end that thought, because changing direction, IE I am going to address you above statement...

Dear geesse In my original quote, way way back in post #12 I came up with this scenario where a 10 year old boy was molested/RAPED by his slightly older but still under aged baby sitter.. now if you where not such a stupid self centered T-what, you would see, know understand and be able to identify that the 10 year old boy being raped by a slightly older baby sitter even if he was willing by me identifying as rape means I never question the legality of a 10 year old's ability to choose to have sex... Only stupid people or perverted people would assume I was asking about the morality despite what I had actually communicated. because either 1 their sheer ignorance would not allow them to see I have already identified it as a crime or 2 their perverse nature/proclivity towards petaphilia would not allow them to see I am not struggling with a the legality of a 10year old having sex and thus do not need to be reminded as they obviously do, and subsequently project their need for a reminder that 10 year olds haveing sex is wrong on to me.
IE, (I will answer the question I feel like answering and not the one you asked)

do you under stand? Still no? let me put it in words you can understand..

Unga boonga (cave man speak) Drich say 10 year old having sex is rape even if done by slightly older girl... even if girl still minor it still rape unga boonga... you understand now?

Unga boong Drich question not be about whether rape or not... Unga boonga drich question be should slightly older girl go to jail and treated like adult? should minor girl who had raped 10 year old boy be listed as a sexual predator rest of life unga bunga... dat- drich question. not whether or not 10 year old can have sex.

You understand or do drich need to dumb it down for you more?

Quote:
(May 23, 2019 at 1:17 pm)Drich Wrote: Do you get it?!?!? the rape was never in question from the beginning! That is a produce of another one of your sexually deviant peers who can not see or answer the scenario I provided but invented his own so he could involve himself without having to think outside of the box he was comfortable in!.

Show me where i talked about rape in this thread. Right, you cant, because i didnt.
Is english your first language?
I'm not quoting you moron those are my words!!!

Quote:
(May 23, 2019 at 1:17 pm)Drich Wrote: The question was always should the older child in this case a girl be made a sex offender/child predator for the rest of her life!....
Possibly a question from someone, to someone else. However not from me to you.


What i asked you, and what you havent answered yet is:
Quote:Do you think 10y old boys should be allowed to decide to have sex or not?
Do you?
Hilarious
That was you question to me... then when I answer you you think my answer is a quote from you...omg you are too stupid to be real!

(May 23, 2019 at 2:58 pm)madog Wrote:
(May 23, 2019 at 11:58 am)Drich Wrote: what do you consider an adult to be? because my senerio place two under age children deciding to have sex.

 

A 17 year old is an adult  ... a 10 year olds, regardless of how mature you think they are, are children ... simple  Dodgy

As regards sentencing, that is decided by looking at all the circumstances ...
Hilarious
ah... no

18 is the magic number douche bag across the world except for where it is 19 and a few hold out where the legal age is still 21.. you see it use to be 21 til we started conscripting 18 year old to goto war. so where is it not 18?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult
In most of the world, including most of the United States, India and China, the legal adult age is 18 (historically 21) for most purposes, with some notable exceptions:

In most of the world, including most of the United States, India and China, the legal adult age is 18 (historically 21) for most purposes, with some notable exceptions:

  1. British ColumbiaNew BrunswickNewfoundland and LabradorNorthwest TerritoriesNova ScotiaNunavutYukon Territory in Canada (though there are some exceptions in which Canadians may be considered legal adults in certain situations[citation needed]); Nebraska and Alabama in The United States, and South Korea (19)

  2. Indonesia (20)

  3. United States purchasing alcohol and entering bars has a minimum age of 21.

and as far as sexual development is concerned it is possible for the boy to be going through puberty as well as the girl again the scenario allows the boy to be very mature while the girl could very well be a late bloomer. which again could put them both on equal ground as far as sexual and mental development goes.

Eitherway and again I still identify the act as rape despite any and all details. the question again for the two dumbest members of this website and any other shuld the older girl be sent to prision and made to serve a full term and then upon release be made to register as a sex offender?

That my dishonest douche is the question I asked, not is rape a crime

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  You think Catholics hate Charles Goodyear Woah0 7 1308 August 28, 2022 at 5:43 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  What do Catholics think of Frollo from "Hunchback of Notre Dame" story? Woah0 2 626 August 26, 2022 at 9:46 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Traddy Catholics on the ropes? Jehanne 16 2114 July 18, 2021 at 2:20 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Catholics warring against the Pope? Fake Messiah 29 7552 November 27, 2017 at 6:52 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Just to know I'm not alone Somecoolguy 36 8576 July 8, 2017 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  CATHOLICS, heads up if you were abused by your priest!...... 21stCenturyIconoclast 110 15614 January 12, 2017 at 4:52 pm
Last Post: Godscreated
Information Catholics VS Protestants Debate Thread Edward John 164 19867 November 15, 2016 at 5:06 pm
Last Post: Drich
  Catholics getting rid of layers of bullshit. Whateverist 17 2481 September 16, 2016 at 10:50 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  The problem with "One true church claim" by catholics Romney 8 2132 August 30, 2016 at 4:39 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Catholics vs. Evangelicals? TrueChristian 40 9069 January 15, 2016 at 1:23 pm
Last Post: MTL



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)