I don't really know what does one's ability to hold urine in combat has to do with anything.

And yes, I would pee myself in combat if I had to. What would you do, tell the enemy to hold fire while you take a leak?

(June 6, 2019 at 12:06 pm)Shell B Wrote:

(June 6, 2019 at 10:11 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Another proof that we have no rules here.

We have rules. Not being an asshole isn't one of them or all three of us would be gone.

No rule against ad homs then. Got it.

---

(June 6, 2019 at 12:11 pm)LastPoet Wrote: I don't really know what does one's ability to hold urine in combat has to do with anything.

You have to dumb it down to playground level.

So, in battle you wanted to pee. What would you do? That is the question?

(June 6, 2019 at 1:29 pm)LastPoet Wrote: So, in battle you wanted to pee. What would you do? That is the question?

You do your job.

Oh let me run off to check my handy dandy rule book 🧐
Hmmm...nope, no rule against ad homs...

(June 6, 2019 at 12:30 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:

(June 6, 2019 at 12:06 pm)Shell B Wrote: We have rules. Not being an asshole isn't one of them or all three of us would be gone.

No rule against ad homs then. Got it.

Took you long enough.

(June 6, 2019 at 1:41 pm)Losty Wrote: Oh let me run off to check my handy dandy rule book 🧐
Hmmm...nope, no rule against ad homs...

Obviously.

---

(June 6, 2019 at 2:02 pm)Shell B Wrote:

(June 6, 2019 at 12:30 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: No rule against ad homs then. Got it.

Took you long enough.

I had this silly idea that attack another person was a bad things. I guess it's a standards issue.

(June 6, 2019 at 7:29 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Hey, whoa now! The rent-a-cop was the "good guy with a gun", and probably acted like any other GGWAG would act.

I'm beginning to have my doubts about the whole 'good guy with a gun' thing.  As often as not, it seems as though good guys with guns are stopped by bad guys with guns.

Boru

(June 6, 2019 at 3:27 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(June 6, 2019 at 7:29 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Hey, whoa now! The rent-a-cop was the "good guy with a gun", and probably acted like any other GGWAG would act.

I'm beginning to have my doubts about the whole 'good guy with a gun' thing.  As often as not, it seems as though good guys with guns are stopped by bad guys with guns.

Boru

Take your typical yeehaw bar, buncha half-drunk cowboy-wannabees. Teach them they can be heroes of they take out a bad guy shooter. Then have one guy make a mistake.

(June 6, 2019 at 3:52 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:

(June 6, 2019 at 3:27 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I'm beginning to have my doubts about the whole 'good guy with a gun' thing.  As often as not, it seems as though good guys with guns are stopped by bad guys with guns.

Boru

Take  your typical yeehaw bar, buncha half-drunk cowboy-wannabees. Teach them they can be heroes of they take out a bad guy shooter. Then have one guy make a mistake.

See, that's the trouble with America - tough guy wannabees all think they're Chuck Norris.  In the UK, tough guy wannabees all think they're Jason Statham, a MUCH more reasonable proposition.  

Boru