(December 11, 2019 at 11:43 am)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(December 11, 2019 at 11:19 am)Dmitry1983 Wrote: They paid more and should receive their fair share

So fair share now is Ivanka getting paid for the jewelry that she lost while people that can't afford the doctor should suffer and die.

And the moisturizer.  Don't forget the moisturizer.

Boru

(December 11, 2019 at 11:19 am)Dmitry1983 Wrote:

(December 11, 2019 at 8:52 am)SUNGULA Wrote: Nope they should receive the same as everyone else

They paid more and should receive their fair share

Then why do they only have one vote, like the poor? Darn socialism.

(December 12, 2019 at 3:00 am)Deesse23 Wrote:

(December 11, 2019 at 11:19 am)Dmitry1983 Wrote: They paid more and should receive their fair share

Then why do they only have one vote, like the poor? Darn socialism.

My solution to this problem would be implementation of citizenship tax. You either pay $10k/year to government or your citizenship will be revoked.

At work.

Putting emotes after comments would help in understanding your levity Dmitry1983.

(December 12, 2019 at 3:12 am)Dmitry1983 Wrote:

(December 12, 2019 at 3:00 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Then why do they only have one vote, like the poor? Darn socialism.

My solution to this problem would be implementation of citizenship tax. You either pay $10k/year to government or your citizenship will be revoked.

Good point. And if you are able to pay more you get a 1st class citizenship, unlike those campesinos who can only afford 2nd or 3rd class.
Fair shares to everyone. 

(December 12, 2019 at 3:12 am)Dmitry1983 Wrote:

(December 12, 2019 at 3:00 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Then why do they only have one vote, like the poor? Darn socialism.

My solution to this problem would be implementation of citizenship tax. You either pay $10k/year to government or your citizenship will be revoked.

What a fantastic idea!  We all know what good stewards governments are when it comes to the people's money. Just a few questions, though.

-Would that $10 000 be in addition to money already paid through income taxes, VAT, property taxes, license fees, and so on, or would money paid via these fees and taxes reduce that $10k figure?

-Would the $10k payment be optional?  In other words, could someone choose losing their citizenship over paying the money?

-What form would this non-citizenship take?  Would people simply lose some of the rights of full citizens or would they be deported?

-If deportation is the answer, where would you send them, how would you pay for it, and how can you force other countries to accept them?

These minor issues aside, I think you've got a winner of an idea, here.

Boru

Quote:My solution to this problem would be implementation of citizenship tax. You either pay $10k/year to government or your citizenship will be revoked.

How about no .How about instead the rich continue to pay as they are ad get the same as everyone else .Because it's fair .

Oh and citizenship not be determined by taxation that's also fair

Seems you guys want to make a Ferenginar.

---

Deficit Don has a jealous meltdown over the fact tha Greta Thunberg is named person of the year by Time magazine.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2019...407278002/

(December 12, 2019 at 8:56 am)SUNGULA Wrote:

Quote:My solution to this problem would be implementation of citizenship tax. You either pay $10k/year to government or your citizenship will be revoked.

How about instead the rich continue to pay as they are ad get the same as everyone else .Because it's fair .

The rich pay more and should receive more. That's fair.