(January 18, 2020 at 11:52 am)Daniel Wilson Wrote:

(January 18, 2020 at 11:33 am)Sal Wrote: Well, introduce yourself and then ask, perhaps?

But why? I just wanted to ask a question, I didn't came here to make new friends.

Sounds like you'll get that done.

(January 18, 2020 at 12:29 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Here's what happened:  The number of links in your posts triggered a sort of spam detector, which puts the post into limbo until staff have had a chance to act on it.

I removed all of the links from both of your identical posts and marked them as 'not spam'.

Read the Forum Rules before this happens again.  I'm sorry you feel the rules are unfair, but we all play by them.

Boru

Thanks, but just I think that in such case the sender of the message should get a clear message explaining the reason for the blocking.

I got the message: "Atheist Forums: The specified thread does not exist."

What exactly should I understand from such a strange message?

"Read the rules" is a clear message.

(January 18, 2020 at 1:16 pm)Daniel Wilson Wrote:

(January 18, 2020 at 12:29 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Here's what happened:  The number of links in your posts triggered a sort of spam detector, which puts the post into limbo until staff have had a chance to act on it.

I removed all of the links from both of your identical posts and marked them as 'not spam'.

Read the Forum Rules before this happens again.  I'm sorry you feel the rules are unfair, but we all play by them.

Boru

Thanks, but just I think that in such case the sender of the message should get a clear message explaining the reason for the blocking.

I got the message: "Atheist Forums: The specified thread does not exist."

What exactly should I understand from such a strange message?

What GS said. If you can’t be bothered to familiarize yourself with the Rules, don’t bother bitching about how you’re notified when you break them.

Boru

False entitlement is a wonderful thing.

Rule 19 of the Ferengi Laws of Acquisition applies -


"Satisfaction is NOT guaranteed".




...

My first thread I went straight into my topic of interest, without introduction, and included a link to a Dawkins video. I still haven't read the rules.

I didn't run into any issues.

(January 18, 2020 at 2:37 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: My first thread I went straight into my topic of interest, without introduction, and included a link to a Dawkins video. I still haven't read the rules.

I didn't run into any issues.

Such a rebel.

---

(January 18, 2020 at 11:08 am)Daniel Wilson Wrote: It is unfair.

Just wanted to ask a question and I need to add some links to it.

---

If this is the reason, then why don't they bother to show me a clear message about that? Why do you let me Guess why I couldn't post my message? Why am I getting a stupid error message which I can't understand instead of explaining?

Unfair is a claim usually made by those under the age of 11.

I see the start of a wonderful forum experience for your tender self.

Quote:But why? I just wanted to ask a question, I didn't came here to make new friends

And since we're not friends, we're not here to answer them
That sounds fair, dunnit?....

(January 18, 2020 at 2:37 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: My first thread I went straight into my topic of interest, without introduction, and included a link to a Dawkins video. I still haven't read the rules.

I didn't run into any issues.

You will now.