(April 4, 2020 at 10:52 am)Editz Wrote: Your point and I have not intersected GS.

Yeah, when I see a person use a word wrong...

I used the word in reply to SINGULA in post number #3.

(April 4, 2020 at 10:12 am)onlinebiker Wrote: Another thread was getting hijacked - so I will pick it up here.

Why is anyone against population control?

My guess - it's a knee jerk reaction - bred in by years of religious twaddle.

Logical people - like some scientists - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...mate-alarm -  are calling for shrinking the population to mitigate human impact on the environment

I dont think overpopulation is the issue we thought it would be. Rather, systems in place currently favor and serve a small minority of the global population at the expense of the whole.

(April 4, 2020 at 10:57 am)Editz Wrote: I used the word in reply to SINGULA in post number #3.

Well a successful bout of population control would require it .OLB's version is a pipe dream.

(April 4, 2020 at 11:08 am)SUNGULA Wrote:

(April 4, 2020 at 10:57 am)Editz Wrote: I used the word in reply to SINGULA in post number #3.

Well a successful bout of population control would require it .OLB's version is a pipe dream.

And this is you ignoring my posts - not reading anything I write - and not sticking your nose so far up my ass that my appendix is hanging up in your nostril?

Just thought I would ask...

(April 4, 2020 at 12:00 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:

(April 4, 2020 at 11:08 am)SUNGULA Wrote: Well a successful bout of population control would require it .OLB's version is a pipe dream.

And this is you ignoring my posts - not reading anything I write - and not sticking your nose so far up my ass that my appendix is hanging up in your nostril?

Just thought I would ask...

1. Nope i am not ignoring your posts and have read what you have what you have written and it's a pipe dream .The only way population would work is through draconian means  that  no government would do . 

2. You continue this silly myth .I have ignored tons of your posts and whole threads you have made .So this is false

The whole thing is delightfully Malthusian - not controlling the population results in population control.

Boru

(April 4, 2020 at 10:12 am)onlinebiker Wrote: Another thread was getting hijacked - so I will pick it up here.

Why is anyone against population control?

My guess - it's a knee jerk reaction - bred in by years of religious twaddle.

Logical people - like some scientists - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...mate-alarm -  are calling for shrinking the population to mitigate human impact on the environment

The mythologies of antiquity were started in an age when our species population was vastly smaller. And even before human written tradition, and even after, the mortality rate in our species was far higher, so evolution drove our species to reproduce as much as possible. The problem is humans are still stuck in that mindset today. Old habits die hard.


More scientific minded humans today are less likely to buy into the reproduction mythology of antiquity. 

It is absolutely true that the world birth rate is severely outpacing our worldwide death rate. More humans means a need for more resource, and faster consumption of resources, and long term, that drives up costs, on top of creating more conflict over resources.

Our species WORLDWIDE does need to slow down reproduction.

(April 4, 2020 at 10:51 am)Ranjr Wrote:

I must say that I think the teeth of these "breeder's" (a distant ex's term - she's since had kids) has been edited. But still lolz tune! 

 

(April 4, 2020 at 12:45 pm)Editz Wrote:

(April 4, 2020 at 10:51 am)Ranjr Wrote:

I must say that I think the teeth of these "breeder's" (a distant ex's term - she's since had kids) has been edited. But still lolz tune! 

 

Jesus christ that video is so cringeworthy. It is like a dentists portfolio of everything that can go wrong with teeth!