You have a point, why should people stop sig heiling just because nazis made it their thing?

The people for whom saying blm means supporting marxism or tearing down western civilization (and the rest of whatever keeps you up at night) aren't exactly a great lot to reference. Same folks who ruined the a-ok and that snazzy high handed salute. Same folks who fed you this steady stream of bullshit, which you're compliantly repeating to others.

(September 14, 2020 at 10:34 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: You have a point, why should people stop sig heiling just because nazis made it their thing?

The people for whom saying blm means supporting marxism or tearing down western civilization (and the rest of whatever keeps you up at night) aren't exactly a great lot to reference.  Same folks who ruined the a-ok and that snazzy high handed salute.  Same folks who fed you this steady stream of bullshit, which you're compliantly repeating to others.

I'm referencing the founders of the BLM organization, with their remarks about being trained Marxists and wanting to do away with the nuclear family. That's what the founders say they want.

-and we've never ever heard someone say exactly that line - because that's original to you. Just like that post full of scientific racism before.

Is it inconceivable to you that you've been propagandized? Conditioned, if you prefer. Indoctrinated. Who do you suspect might have indoctrinated you on the items you've shared with us? Do you reckon it's BLMs founders that are conditioning you to white supremacy? BLM in general?

Quote:I'm referencing the founders of the BLM organization, with their remarks about being trained Marxists and wanting to do away with the nuclear family. That's what the founders say they want.

Bullshit . One founder said she was a trained communist which is irrelevant to BLM as a movement , And one document spoke of the nuclear family  which in a decentralized movement like BLM means absolutely nothing ,And can't even be compared to all lives matter which undeniably only exists to distract away from black lives matter so this whole comparison is stupid.

Your red scare  delusions are hilarious . 

I’m always puzzled as to why people are afraid of Marxism. It’s exactly as much of a threat as an nuclear powered wombat.

Boru

Marx May have made unrealistic and overreaching extrapolations about possible future human Societal interaction, but like Newton to Physics, Marx nonetheless remains one of the most insightful social And economic historians, and perhaps single handedly advanced the state of understanding Underlying mechanism behind social and economic history more any other person in history.

So the little shits on the right wing, have some respect. You don’t need to be a Marxist to see how much Marx advanced our understanding of economic and social history of the world, while right wing shits spew disingenuous platitudes.

(September 14, 2020 at 12:48 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: Marx May have made unrealistic and overreaching extrapolations about possible future human Societal interaction, but like Newton to Physics, Marx nonetheless remains one of the most insightful social And economic historians, and perhaps single handedly advanced the state of understanding Underlying mechanism behind social and economic history more any other person in history.

So the little shits on the right wing, have some respect.   You don’t need to be a Marxist to see how much Marx advanced our understanding of economic and social history of the world, while right wing shits spew disingenuous platitudes.

Marx was a deluded old mystic with a true talent for guessing wrong about history. He’s no threat and never has been.

Boru

(September 14, 2020 at 12:53 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

Anomalocaris Wrote:pid='1998513' dateline='1600102120']Marx May have made unrealistic and overreaching extrapolations about possible future human Societal interaction, but like Newton to Physics, Marx nonetheless remains one of the most insightful social And economic historians, and perhaps single handedly advanced the state of understanding Underlying mechanism behind social and economic history more any other person in history.

So the little shits on the right wing, have some respect.   You don’t need to be a Marxist to see how much Marx advanced our understanding of economic and social history of the world, while right wing shits spew disingenuous platitudes.

Marx was a deluded old mystic with a true talent for guessing wrong about history. He’s no threat and never has been.

Boru

He was the 19th century version of a limosine liberal. A rich twat telling everyone what poor people want.


Fuck him.

(September 14, 2020 at 12:53 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(September 14, 2020 at 12:48 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: Marx May have made unrealistic and overreaching extrapolations about possible future human Societal interaction, but like Newton to Physics, Marx nonetheless remains one of the most insightful social And economic historians, and perhaps single handedly advanced the state of understanding Underlying mechanism behind social and economic history more any other person in history.

So the little shits on the right wing, have some respect.   You don’t need to be a Marxist to see how much Marx advanced our understanding of economic and social history of the world, while right wing shits spew disingenuous platitudes.

Marx was a deluded old mystic with a true talent for guessing wrong about history. He’s no threat and never has been.

Boru

Nope Marx was a excellent historian a reasonable economic theorist .And while he did get things wrong he did hell of lot better of a job then some capitalist theorists like Hayek or Mises those two losers were wrong about pretty much everything .As for Marx being a threat a agree he isn't because economic treatise didn't lead to the gulag stupid leadership did .

---

Quote:He was the 19th century version of a limosine liberal. A rich twat telling everyone what poor people want.

Which shows us you know fuck all about Marx and how he developed his idea's

(September 14, 2020 at 10:44 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: -and we've never ever heard someone say exactly that line - because that's original to you.  Just like that post full of scientific racism before.  

Is it inconceivable to you that you've been propagandized?  Conditioned, if you prefer.  Indoctrinated.  Who do you suspect might have indoctrinated you on the items you've shared with us?  Do you reckon it's BLMs founders that are conditioning you to white supremacy?  BLM in general?

You know it's more than alt righters that are raising concerns about BLM and other social justice folks' agenda, right? Have you seen Bret Weinstein's DarkHorse podcast that he does with his lovely wife? I watch that a lot and they cover this stuff all the time. They are gravely concerned about the direction of these protests. They are gravely concerned about the way things are trending. They are far from perfect, but are pretty fair with their analysis. Have they also been indoctrinated by the alt right? Were they wrong to refuse to leave the Evergreen campus when the students (turned to rioters armed with baseball bats) tried to force them to leave campus for the day because of their pale skin? Must I have been indoctrinated by Nick Fuentes to see that it's a bad idea to want to do away with the nuclear family? I can think for myself and I'm certainly no fan of Fox News or Trump. Same goes for CNN, the NYT, or any other outlet which are every bit as bad as Fox. Same for all the news networks here in Canada where I reside. They're all trash. I look at the facts and base my opinions on that. I am pretty good at seeing through the BS where the facts are twisted around and used to fit whatever agenda that outlet wants to push. I don't trust any corporate media or independent media for that matter. They're all flawed in one way or another.