Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 7:01 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Serious] G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
#31
RE: G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
(September 17, 2020 at 5:36 am)WinterHold Wrote:
(September 17, 2020 at 5:01 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Agreed. I don’t think he grasps that, while getting these women out of prison is undeniably a good thing, it doesn’t come close to addressing the core issue, which is that Saudi Arabia is the kind of country that would imprison women for asking for basic human rights in the first place.

Boru

This topic is not discussing what's wrong in Saudi Arabia, it is discussing:

Quote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/...story.html
[url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/g-20-leaders-dont-forget-the-womens-rights-advocates-rotting-in-saudi-prisons/2020/09/13/fd5f756a-f374-11ea-999c-67ff7bf6a9d2_story.html][/url]

Please stop deviating the topic to make it turn from a request to the G-20 to a discussion about Saudi Arabia.

These women are in prison, the Saudi regime is oppressive and led by lunatics that require a response from the G-20.

Once again I advise you to respect the [Serious] tag.

Thank you.

It's also not discussing the percentage of Muslims in the world.

Quote:These women are in prison, the Saudi regime is oppressive and led by lunatics that require a response from the G-20.

You JUST said that the topic isn't the Saudi Arabia, now you want to include Saudi oppression in the topic. Make up your mind.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#32
RE: G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
(September 17, 2020 at 6:01 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(September 17, 2020 at 5:36 am)WinterHold Wrote: This topic is not discussing what's wrong in Saudi Arabia, it is discussing:

[url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/g-20-leaders-dont-forget-the-womens-rights-advocates-rotting-in-saudi-prisons/2020/09/13/fd5f756a-f374-11ea-999c-67ff7bf6a9d2_story.html][/url]

Please stop deviating the topic to make it turn from a request to the G-20 to a discussion about Saudi Arabia.

These women are in prison, the Saudi regime is oppressive and led by lunatics that require a response from the G-20.

Once again I advise you to respect the [Serious] tag.

Thank you.

It's also not discussing the percentage of Muslims in the world.

Quote:These women are in prison, the Saudi regime is oppressive and led by lunatics that require a response from the G-20.

You JUST said that the topic isn't the Saudi Arabia, now you want to include Saudi oppression in the topic. Make up your mind.

Boru

Yes, the topic is not "Saudi Arabia's culture".

The topic is "what the G-20 should do concerning the Saudi terrible locking of female activists behind bars, torturing them and even raping them.

For speaking about Saudi culture, you can open other topics that discuss the issue.
You have been told this in so many replies by me, so please respect the [serious] sign and enough deviating the topic more. I will not respond to you if you keep your attitude.
Reply
#33
RE: G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
(September 17, 2020 at 5:36 am)WinterHold Wrote: These women are in prison, the Saudi regime is oppressive and led by lunatics that require a response from the G-20.
If your regime is oppressive, do something, for fucks sake.

Look at Eastern Germany and the whole fucking Warsaw pact in the late 80s / early 90s. Look at the same countries in 1953, 1956 and 1968. Look at Belarus right now.
Just open your fucking eyes for a change.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
#34
RE: G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
Quote:The topic is "what the G-20 should do concerning the Saudi terrible locking of female activists behind bars, torturing them and even raping them.

And that's exactly what Saudi culture is.  How can we discuss the treatment of these activists without discussing the culture that is responsible for that treatment?

Discussing Saudi culture in the context of these imprisoned women IS on topic, it's EXACTLY on topic - to discuss one without the other would be incoherent.  Asking what the G20 can or should do about the treatment of these women is precisely the same as asking what the G20 can or should do to change Saudi culture.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#35
RE: G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
(September 17, 2020 at 6:54 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
Quote:The topic is "what the G-20 should do concerning the Saudi terrible locking of female activists behind bars, torturing them and even raping them.

And that's exactly what Saudi culture is.  How can we discuss the treatment of these activists without discussing the culture that is responsible for that treatment?

Discussing Saudi culture in the context of these imprisoned women IS on topic, it's EXACTLY on topic - to discuss one without the other would be incoherent.  Asking what the G20 can or should do about the treatment of these women is precisely the same as asking what the G20 can or should do to change Saudi culture.

Boru

It's not about changing Saudi culture; the G20 is in no position to enforce its laws on anybody -that would be a form of invasion-.

The G20 is simply asked to not shake hands with the Sauds or take money from them until they free these women, and stop terrorism as means of dealing with criticism.

The whole article in the op is focused on this single demand: if the G20 acts vigilant against the Sauds they can lead to a drastic change in how the country deals with human rights. But instead of acting vigilant; they allow the Sauds to join their meetings instead of boycotting their government and enforce strong economical sanctions against the kingdom.
Reply
#36
RE: G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
(September 17, 2020 at 5:30 pm)WinterHold Wrote:
(September 17, 2020 at 6:54 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: And that's exactly what Saudi culture is.  How can we discuss the treatment of these activists without discussing the culture that is responsible for that treatment?

Discussing Saudi culture in the context of these imprisoned women IS on topic, it's EXACTLY on topic - to discuss one without the other would be incoherent.  Asking what the G20 can or should do about the treatment of these women is precisely the same as asking what the G20 can or should do to change Saudi culture.

Boru

It's not about changing Saudi culture; the G20 is in no position to enforce its laws on anybody -that would be a form of invasion-.

The G20 is simply asked to not shake hands with the Sauds or take money from them until they free these women, and stop terrorism as means of dealing with criticism.

The whole article in the op is focused on this single demand: if the G20 acts vigilant against the Sauds they can lead to a drastic change in how the country deals with human rights. But instead of acting vigilant; they allow the Sauds to join their meetings instead of boycotting their government and enforce strong economical sanctions against the kingdom.

But the Saudi treatment of women, use of terrorism (both direct and indirect), and disregard for human rights ARE part of Saudi culture. Boycotts and sanctions would be an attempt to change that culture.

You say that the G20 are in no position to enforce their laws on anybody, but then you call for them to enforce sanctions. Sanctions have the force of law.

What else ya got?

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#37
RE: G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
(September 17, 2020 at 6:09 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(September 17, 2020 at 5:30 pm)WinterHold Wrote: It's not about changing Saudi culture; the G20 is in no position to enforce its laws on anybody -that would be a form of invasion-.

The G20 is simply asked to not shake hands with the Sauds or take money from them until they free these women, and stop terrorism as means of dealing with criticism.

The whole article in the op is focused on this single demand: if the G20 acts vigilant against the Sauds they can lead to a drastic change in how the country deals with human rights. But instead of acting vigilant; they allow the Sauds to join their meetings instead of boycotting their government and enforce strong economical sanctions against the kingdom.

But the Saudi treatment of women, use of terrorism (both direct and indirect), and disregard for human rights ARE part of Saudi culture. Boycotts and sanctions would be an attempt to change that culture.

You say that the G20 are in no position to enforce their laws on anybody, but then you call for them to enforce sanctions. Sanctions have the force of law.

What else ya got?

Boru

Yes. The G20 is in no position to change the culture of any country.
But it is in position to set rules that govern who joins it.

Saudi Arabia should never be allowed to join their meetings before having a clean human rights record.
That -as you see- is not changing of culture: that is enforcing a term for dealing with the kingdom -or any other country-,
Reply
#38
RE: G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
Why, do the members of the g20 have clean human rights records? Who certifies the cleanliness of any given country in that regard? If a country -isn't- in your alliance, pact, or agreement, what incentives and what legal recourse do you (or they) have to compel their (or your) actions?

This may expose a fundamental difference of opinion. We in the west generally tend to believe that our political ideals will win out in a direct competition for hearts an minds. We don't want to exclude people to make them comply, we prefer to include them, and once they're in, apply pressure from all sides. There are pragmatic benefits to dealing with the authorities of a country as they are, rather than regime changing our way to what we want in every instance.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#39
RE: G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
(September 18, 2020 at 8:28 am)WinterHold Wrote:
(September 17, 2020 at 6:09 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: But the Saudi treatment of women, use of terrorism (both direct and indirect), and disregard for human rights ARE part of Saudi culture. Boycotts and sanctions would be an attempt to change that culture.

You say that the G20 are in no position to enforce their laws on anybody, but then you call for them to enforce sanctions. Sanctions have the force of law.

What else ya got?

Boru

Yes. The G20 is in no position to change the culture of any country.
But it is in position to set rules that govern who joins it.

Saudi Arabia should never be allowed to join their meetings before having a clean human rights record.
That -as you see- is not changing of culture: that is enforcing a term for dealing with the kingdom -or any other country-,

If a clean human rights record is the standard, there would BE no G20.

I find it both amusing and sad that you want a gaggle of countries who - without exception - have blemished records on human rights (some of them countries which you persistently rail against for that very reason) to correct human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#40
RE: G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons
Anything and everything that helps to push all of his own problems onto others as their responsibility in creation and solution is preferable to conceding that something just -might- be wrong with his culture. That, if we want to see change in those regions, it's going to require a change in culture.

Just as it did with our own identical issues and their own identical justifications for being terrible.

You want help, Atlas? Take a lesson from our history. Or...if you prefer, you can be the guy who invites a snake into your living room and then complains when it bites you.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Trans women banned from world chess LinuxGal 37 4225 October 15, 2023 at 10:10 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Women's Rights Lek 314 29203 April 25, 2023 at 5:22 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Performers Should Speak Up or Not Attend Saudi Music Festival WinterHold 9 855 December 15, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: Ranjr
  New Zealand - you gotta be this old to have rights. onlinebiker 123 10308 December 13, 2021 at 5:18 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  [Serious] Biden on punishing MBS and Saudi Arabia WinterHold 27 3147 March 23, 2021 at 10:31 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Saudi journalist killed and hacked inside Saudi embassy in Istanbul WinterHold 333 40745 January 16, 2021 at 6:26 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  J.K. Rowling had to return civil rights award Silver 68 6905 October 16, 2020 at 10:39 am
Last Post: Rank Stranger
  BREAKING: Trump Boasted Of Saving Saudi Prince Over Jamal Khashoggi Killing WinterHold 16 1696 September 13, 2020 at 12:38 pm
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  BREAKING: Former Twitter employees charged with spying for Saudi Arabia WinterHold 14 1367 September 6, 2020 at 12:56 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  BREAKING: Saudi Crown Prince accused of assassination plot against exiled official WinterHold 2 630 August 10, 2020 at 10:05 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)