(June 19, 2021 at 10:35 pm)arewethereyet Wrote:

(June 19, 2021 at 10:26 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: You should be thanking me, I am being so generous:

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/04/n...led-people

Also from peter singer : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pG01ASb...l=imadix14 (Bestiality is fine)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piNnP8NtQzk
Quote : "

Justin Brierley: Ultimately, your belief that rape is wrong is as arbitrary as the fact that we've evolved five fingers rather than six.

Richard Dawkins: You could say that, yeah" 

https://www.mrctv.org/videos/richard-daw...-arbitrary

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/for...p?t=218937 (Atheist Dan Barker says child rape could be moral)


Let me know if you want some more.

You are the same old asshole you always were.  Not that I expected more.

But see these people are atheists so, therefore, somehow you are supposed to agree with them .....Because reasons 

(June 19, 2021 at 10:39 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: And I bet crack cocaine has caused fewer deaths than nicotine. Doesn't mean one is less dangerous than the other.

It's true that no conclusion in favor of religion could be drawn from this. But according to this chart, a non-religious country is more likely to go to war than a religious country.

Everything these asshats don't like leads to bestiality. They seem to be awfully concerned about someone screwing their donkey.

Quote:It's true that no conclusion in favor of religion could be drawn from this. But according to this chart, a non-religious country is more likely to go to war than a religious country.

No it doesn't

(June 19, 2021 at 10:39 pm)Helios Wrote: I love how his whole argument is. See these atheists said this therefore you should agree with them.

Nope. The argument is that you atheists can justify anything including rape and bestiality. I don't think you can refute Peter Singer's (a professional philosopher, BTW) rationalization of raping disabled people, that's what atheism offers you : arbitrary morality. Enjoy.

(June 19, 2021 at 10:37 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: Pro-choicers have perfectly good reasons for frowning [emphasis added] upon doing things which are unhealthy to a fetus.

The goal isn't to make you accept pro-life—its to question your views on choice. Last I checked frowns don't prevent developmental defects, do they?

(June 19, 2021 at 10:11 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:

(June 19, 2021 at 9:56 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: Because of what might result.

Should the results in any way infringe upon a woman's body and choices?

I mean, that's her call. If she is going to bring the baby to term and asked for my advice on HER decision, I would advise that teratogens are a bad choice.

If she didn't ask my advice would I ever force my concerns about teratogens upon her? No.

Quote:Nope. The argument is that you atheists can justify anything including rape and bestiality. I don't think you can refute Peter Singer's (a professional philosopher, BTW) rationalization of raping disabled people, that's what atheism offers you : arbitrary morality. Enjoy.

No atheists cannot justify anything. Peter Singer is an idiot whose philosophy degree isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Atheism neither leads to arbitrary morality or the ability to rationalize anything. Enjoy spewing empty apologist bravado and justifying us taking you even less seriously than already did.

Fucking moron

(June 19, 2021 at 10:45 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:

(June 19, 2021 at 10:37 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: Pro-choicers have perfectly good reasons for frowning [emphasis added] upon doing things which are unhealthy to a fetus.

The goal isn't to make you accept pro-life—its to question your views on choice. Last I checked frowns don't prevent developmental defects, do they?

"Frowning upon" is a colloquialism which roughly means "does not condone." C'mon, man.

I think you are making good arguments. I dig your attempts to make me question things in that regard. No issue at all there.

(June 19, 2021 at 10:44 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Nope. The argument is that you atheists can justify anything including rape and bestiality. I don't think you can refute Peter Singer's (a professional philosopher, BTW) rationalization of raping disabled people, that's what atheism offers you : arbitrary morality. Enjoy.

The news is constantly filled with religious fundamentalists and religious leaders doing immoral things such as raping and killing children.

When was the last time you saw a headline that read, Man behaves immorally because of atheism?