(June 27, 2021 at 1:17 pm)brewer Wrote: The British are running an ivermectin study now.: https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-06-23-ive...iple-trial

True but note it's only a principle study

(June 27, 2021 at 1:21 pm)Helios Wrote:

(June 27, 2021 at 1:17 pm)brewer Wrote: The British are running an ivermectin study now.: https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-06-23-ive...iple-trial

True but note it's only a principle study

Joke, not understanding the acronym or is there something I'm missing?

(June 27, 2021 at 1:31 pm)brewer Wrote:

(June 27, 2021 at 1:21 pm)Helios Wrote: True but note it's only a principle study

Joke, not understanding the acronym or is there something I'm missing?

No was just pointing out that this study even if successful is still just a principle study and more would need to be done as the PRINCIPLE program isn't the last step in the treatment trials

(June 27, 2021 at 1:34 pm)Helios Wrote:

(June 27, 2021 at 1:31 pm)brewer Wrote: Joke, not understanding the acronym or is there something I'm missing?

No was just pointing out that this study even if successful is still just a principle study and more would need to be done.

Agreed.

(June 27, 2021 at 8:59 am)brewer Wrote:

(June 27, 2021 at 8:41 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: It is not bad science though. There have been studies showing plenty of benefits to using Ivermectin, and it is not a dangerous drug. There is very little risk in taking it, even if it doesn't work for that person. It's all about money and profits. That's why positive talk of the drug is being censored.

Do you even know the specifics of the situation I am talking about, or are you just assuming it is bad science because the powers that be have deemed it so? Look into it for yourself before you go and call it bad science and call for a return to the dark ages where scientists and doctors are punished for speaking out.

Show me the study. It's bad science to push a drug onto an unknowing public until approved or in an advanced clinical trial. I suppose you could point to compassionate use but that is not what is being advocated.

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.n...vermectin/

Most drugs have dangers: https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/pr...ed-animals

The same thing was said about about hydroxychloroquine and oleander extract. How'd that turn out.

What does an evolutionary biologist have to contribute to medicine? Send me his CV and we'll compare that to, let say, an MD or biochemist.

The problem is you think infotainment = science. It does not.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-conte...VID-19.pdf

---

(June 27, 2021 at 9:21 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: The separatists obsession with dark cabals suppressing The Truth is boring.  Meanwhile, back in florida

Quote:We did not know about this report, We are obviously very interested in all of the evidence that's coming to light.

-Miami Dade County Mayor Daniella Cava.

https://www.townofsurfsidefl.gov/docs/de...882a1194_2

(they're now considering evacuating a second building, same builders, same incompetence/cost cutting issues)

Yes, because thinking the rich want to get richer is such a controversial opinion. It's crazy, I know. It's right up there with interdimensional child molesters.

(June 28, 2021 at 4:48 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-conte...VID-19.pdf

That's not a study. Don't be intentionally dense to try and support a position.

And that linked paper has been rejected:

Quote:The editors of Frontiers in Pharmacology have taken down an article about the use of the antiparasitic drug ivermectin in COVID-19 patients. The paper, which was written by members of an organization called the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), had been provisionally accepted and posted in abstract form by the journal in January, but was ultimately rejected this Monday (March 1). The editors determined that it contained unsubstantiated claims and violated the journal’s editorial policies.

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opini...tion-68505

Quote:“Regardless of the publication stage or subject of a manuscript, if the integrity of an article is called into question, our policy is to investigate. Upon further scrutiny by our Research Integrity team about the objectivity of this paper during the provisional acceptance phase, it was revealed that the article made a series of strong, unsupported claims based on studies with insufficient statistical significance, and at times, without the use of control groups. Further, the authors promoted their own specific ivermectin-based treatment which is inappropriate for a review article and against our editorial policies.

https://blog.frontiersin.org/2021/03/02/...statement/

This might help you understand (maybe-click on the links in the article, read the responses): https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/ar...19-therapy

Or you could simply google 'latest covid ivermectin clinical trial results' and start reading.

Quote:Yes, because thinking the rich want to get richer is such a controversial opinion. It's crazy, I know. It's right up there with interdimensional child molesters.

Yeah that's not where the loons stop though

Indigenous women have been forcibly sterilized in Canada  

https://ijrcenter.org/forced-sterilizati...in-canada/

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/for...-1.5102981

https://globalnews.ca/news/7920118/indig...te-report/

(June 23, 2021 at 8:41 pm)brewer Wrote: First Jan 6 sentence, 3 yrs probation, 40 hours community service, $500 fine.

That's the kind of sentence you get for drunk and disorderly, not trying to overthrow a government. At least Hitler did time and they were way too lenient on him.

---

(June 24, 2021 at 12:34 pm)brewer Wrote: Michigan Senate finds no voter fraud. But here's what it did find: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/p...312166001/

Of course they'll say they found no fraud. The republitraitor state senate is not going to give away their strategy for "winning" the state's congress seats next year.

(June 29, 2021 at 1:46 am)Nomad Wrote:

(June 23, 2021 at 8:41 pm)brewer Wrote: First Jan 6 sentence, 3 yrs probation, 40 hours community service, $500 fine.

That's the kind of sentence you get for drunk and disorderly, not trying to overthrow a government.  At least Hitler did time and they were way too lenient on him.

---

(June 24, 2021 at 12:34 pm)brewer Wrote: Michigan Senate finds no voter fraud. But here's what it did find: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/p...312166001/

Of course they'll say they found no fraud.  The republitraitor state senate is not going to give away their strategy for "winning" the state's congress seats next year.

Anything other than the party YOU join is evil, eh?



Whatta assmunch.