(July 16, 2023 at 3:22 pm)Helios Wrote: I know you didn't but it remains a fact he is

He may be, sir. I'll have to look into it more. 
And from what I've seen here, I respect you a very great deal.

(July 16, 2023 at 4:43 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:

(July 16, 2023 at 3:22 pm)Helios Wrote: I know you didn't but it remains a fact he is

He may be, sir. I'll have to look into it more. 
And from what I've seen here, I respect you a very great deal.

And from what I have seen I respect you a very great deal regardless of any disagreement we may have

No fucking in public threads. It's the rules.

(July 16, 2023 at 6:15 pm)Angrboda Wrote: No fucking in public threads.  It's the rules.

And yet,....................

Actually, the Jesus of the bible almost certainly didn't exist. It is likely at a preacher called Jesus existed. Most of his reported life is invented according to a religious agenda.

The audacity of this twat! Hey fuckstain, just because your dimly lit bulb has a hard time processing the meaningless existence of hoomans, and you have to hide behind your make believe god to justify you massively arrogant ego, doesn't mean everyone is that cowardly or stupid.

(July 21, 2023 at 2:29 pm)Loaded dice Wrote: Doubting Muhammad's existence is up there with the most ridiculous anti-Muslim claims ever made. Ironically, this denial makes the emergence of the Qur'an and the Islamic message way more difficult to explain in naturalistic terms, it perfectly plays into the hands of Muslim apologists by lending support to the thesis of divine intervention.

Positing that people tell tall tales does not make gods more likely.

What's likely, is that you've been conditioned to believe that literally everything makes your god more likely, and will say that..no matter what.

(July 21, 2023 at 2:29 pm)Loaded dice Wrote: Doubting Muhammad's existence is up there with the most ridiculous anti-Muslim claims ever made. Ironically, this denial makes the emergence of the Qur'an and the Islamic message way more difficult to explain in naturalistic terms, it perfectly plays into the hands of Muslim apologists by lending support to the thesis of divine intervention.

Not because you say so.
There's nothing miraculous about the emergence of the Qur'an. Just like all the other writing of the day, it "borrowed" many well-known stories from surrounding cultures.

1. Moses and the Fish, (came from Babylon/Ugarit/the El myths),
2. Solomon listening to the ants, common fairy tales, existing all over the Ancient Near East,
3. Jinns, (genies) working for Solomon, both common fairy tales, existing all over the Ancient Near East,
4. Mary in the temple, (stolen from one of the proto gospels),
5. Jesus talking in the crib, (from the known Proto Gospel after Jacob)
6. The Egyptian child stories, (from the Arab Child Gospel, and The Thomas' Child Gospel), both just made up fairy stories.
7. Jesus making birds from clay, (known source, .."The Child Gospel after Thomas vs 1-4),
8. Mary and the Palm, was taken from the Proto Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 20.
9. Mo's Night Journey to Heaven, taken from either the Hebrew Merebah, or the well known Gnostic "Enoc's Journey to Heaven", which is identical to to Ibn Ishaq’s story after Abu Said al-Chudri)
10. The Sleepers in the Cave, straight from the fairy story from Ephesus, (Mo got the dates wrong, but the story is right),
11. Alexander the Great, (Surah 18), (straight plagiarism), AND there was NO place in the world with enough iron blocks to close off a whole valley in 330 BC.
12. The myth about Ad. Straight from Arab folk tales.
13. Thamud – same as 12.
14. Median – copied from Arab folk tales.