(February 17, 2024 at 9:03 am)Ahriman Wrote: During the time period in which the American Founding Fathers were around, nearly everyone in the United Kingdom was a Creationist. The Founding Fathers didn't want this for their own country, and that's why part of the 1st Amendment has to do with freedom of religion.

That’s so stupid it’s not even wrong. Just gibberish. The last of your Founding Fathers died a quarter century before creationism (in the sense of this thread) was even a thing.

Boru

(February 17, 2024 at 11:13 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(February 17, 2024 at 9:03 am)Ahriman Wrote: During the time period in which the American Founding Fathers were around, nearly everyone in the United Kingdom was a Creationist. The Founding Fathers didn't want this for their own country, and that's why part of the 1st Amendment has to do with freedom of religion.

That’s so stupid it’s not even wrong. Just gibberish. The last of your Founding Fathers died a quarter century before creationism (in the sense of this thread) was even a thing.

Boru

Well, they didn't call it Creationism, but it still was.

(February 17, 2024 at 11:23 am)Ahriman Wrote:

(February 17, 2024 at 11:13 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: That’s so stupid it’s not even wrong. Just gibberish. The last of your Founding Fathers died a quarter century before creationism (in the sense of this thread) was even a thing.

Boru

Well, they didn't call it Creationism, but it still was.

It was not. Creationism (again, in the sense of this thread) is the denial of the theories of biological evolution, particularly as formulated by Wallace and Darwin. You can’t deny a theory that doesn’t yet exist.

And the religious freedom aspect of the First Amendment was put in place to avoid religious persecution.

You’re so stupid.

Boru

See @Ahriman, if you talk this gibberish at work then your coworkers will get sick of being around you


How old are you?

(February 17, 2024 at 11:30 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(February 17, 2024 at 11:23 am)Ahriman Wrote: Well, they didn't call it Creationism, but it still was.

It was not. Creationism (again, in the sense of this thread) is the denial of the theories of biological evolution, particularly as formulated by Wallace and Darwin. You can’t deny a theory that doesn’t yet exist.

And the religious freedom aspect of the First Amendment was put in place to avoid religious persecution.

You’re so stupid.

Boru

Nope. "religious freedom" in that particular sense meant freedom from the prevailing religious dogmas of the United Kingdom.

(February 17, 2024 at 11:40 am)Ahriman Wrote:

(February 17, 2024 at 11:30 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: It was not. Creationism (again, in the sense of this thread) is the denial of the theories of biological evolution, particularly as formulated by Wallace and Darwin. You can’t deny a theory that doesn’t yet exist.

And the religious freedom aspect of the First Amendment was put in place to avoid religious persecution.

You’re so stupid.

Boru

Nope. "religious freedom" in that particular sense meant freedom from the prevailing religious dogmas of the United Kingdom.

It manifestly did not. But even if it did, it wouldn’t help your argument because a ‘creationist dogma’ did not exist - in the UK or anywhere else - when the Amendment was drafted.

Boru

Please explain to me the link between creationists not accepting medical treatment and the Bill of Rights.

If you need to do it under Daily Conspiracies, I understand.

(February 17, 2024 at 11:50 am)arewethereyet Wrote: Please explain to me the link between creationists not accepting medical treatment and the Bill of Rights.

If you need to do it under Daily Conspiracies, I understand.

Isn't it obvious? The BOR gives us freedom, which includes the right to refuse medical treatment.

(February 17, 2024 at 12:21 pm)Ahriman Wrote:

(February 17, 2024 at 11:50 am)arewethereyet Wrote: Please explain to me the link between creationists not accepting medical treatment and the Bill of Rights.

If you need to do it under Daily Conspiracies, I understand.

Isn't it obvious? The BOR gives us freedom, which includes the right to refuse medical treatment.

Yer an idiot.

(February 17, 2024 at 12:21 pm)Ahriman Wrote:

(February 17, 2024 at 11:50 am)arewethereyet Wrote: Please explain to me the link between creationists not accepting medical treatment and the Bill of Rights.

If you need to do it under Daily Conspiracies, I understand.

Isn't it obvious? The BOR gives us freedom, which includes the right to refuse medical treatment.

see what I’m saying @Ahriman? 




How old are you?