(May 5, 2025 at 9:33 am)Sheldon Wrote: ...he waffled something about not knowing how to properly publish his work, but that one of his professors was going to help him.

What even is this allegation lol. Now, I will give you the benefit of the doubt, because I do remember there was another member on the forum that was always sharing their cyptic published papers, something in computer science.

(May 5, 2025 at 10:45 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:

(May 5, 2025 at 9:33 am)Sheldon Wrote: ...he waffled something about not knowing how to properly publish his work, but that one of his professors was going to help him.

What even is this allegation lol. Now, I will give you the benefit of the doubt, because I do remember there was another member on the forum that was always sharing their cyptic published papers, something in computer science.

So you've never challenged species evolution, or natural selection, on the Atheist Republic forum? It was the exact same username, and the penchant to bluff is uncannily similar. Must be one of those weird coincidences, that theists are always insisting must involve supernatural magic.

(May 5, 2025 at 8:51 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:

(May 5, 2025 at 8:28 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: You have a great day now. I'm done with you and your dishonesty.

I suppose there isn't much else for you to do in the absence of a quote.

(May 5, 2025 at 11:12 am)Sheldon Wrote: So you've never challenged species evolution, or natural selection, on the Atheist Republic forum? It was the exact same username, and the penchant to bluff is uncannily similar. Must be one of those weird coincidences, that theists are always insisting must involve supernatural magic.

I've even been critical of evolution on this forum. But to say I was writing a paper with my professor's help is a wild thing to allege lol.

(May 5, 2025 at 11:26 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:

(May 5, 2025 at 11:12 am)Sheldon Wrote: So you've never challenged species evolution, or natural selection, on the Atheist Republic forum? It was the exact same username, and the penchant to bluff is uncannily similar. Must be one of those weird coincidences, that theists are always insisting must involve supernatural magic.

I've even been critical of evolution on this forum. But to say I was writing a paper with my professor's help is a wild thing to allege lol.

Critical of an objective scientific fact, we will put a pin in that for now then. Now, to be clear, the John 6IX Breezy on the Atheist Republic forum, claimed he had falsified species evolution, and only claimed one his professors was going to help him understand how to publish this paradigm shifting work, after he was understandably asked why there was nothing on the news about him receiving a Nobel prize  for falsifying an established scientific theory. He seemed in earnest, it was pretty funny. So you're claiming you were not that poster, and that the exact same username is a coincidence?

(May 5, 2025 at 11:35 am)Sheldon Wrote: Now, to be clear, the John 6IX Breezy on the Atheist Republic forum, claimed he had falsified species evolution, and only claimed one his professors was going to help him understand how to publish this paradigm shifting work.

I'm sure all my posts are still up there. So if I claimed it, quote it.

(May 5, 2025 at 11:46 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:

(May 5, 2025 at 11:35 am)Sheldon Wrote: Now, to be clear, the John 6IX Breezy on the Atheist Republic forum, claimed he had falsified species evolution, and only claimed one his professors was going to help him understand how to publish this paradigm shifting work.

I'm sure all my posts are still up there. So if I claimed it, quote it.

Brilliant idea, I waste my time searching years of threads from the archives of the old site, so you can claim it was another John 6IX Breezy. You just posted several times denying there was a quote in this thread, alongside the quote, come on man. 

If you state it wasn't you, then I guess it will remain a mystery, as will this initial response from you, one assumes before your natural urge to bluff and deny kicked in?

Quote:John 6IX Breezy Wrote:

(2 hours ago)Sheldon Wrote: Wrote:A good few years back, on another forum,

Thats why it's funny that GrandNudger brags about being on forums for a decade, as if the rest of the world hasn't also been online for over a decade.

I mean geez, you remember me from when I was probably a freshmen in college lol. I've gone to grad school for cognitive science in the years since. 

Moderator Notice
Lets please get this back on topic. If you want to go back and forth about misquotes or statements here that's fine, unproductive but whatever. I'm drawing the line at this spilling over to peoples online posting history (Unless they are copy and pasting stuff they already posted elsewhere).  Thanks.

(May 5, 2025 at 12:00 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote:

Moderator Notice
Lets please get this back on topic. If you want to go back and forth about misquotes or statements here that's fine, unproductive but whatever. I'm drawing the line at this spilling over to peoples online posting history (Unless they are copy and pasting stuff they already posted elsewhere).  Thanks.

Fair enough, though if someone is denying objective scientific facts, this might go a long way to explaining why they'd have no problem believing unevidenced archaic superstitions.

"This is because faith isn't blind belief, it is trust. And trust requires a context where you have good reasons to trust, but not enough to achieve certainty. "

Now, anyone who reads this ought to see nothing more than a general definition for faith. There is nothing stating I believe or don't believe in God, there is nothing stating what I do or don't have faith in, and there certainly isn't any claims that I have or don't have many good reasons for God's existence.

The words simply do not say what they are accused of saying. It is delusional to read so much into so little, and chase me around for 20 pages for not engaging. It's very odd behavior.