(August 21, 2026 at 12:35 am)PepsiMAX Wrote:

(August 20, 2026 at 5:30 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I’ve never heard the term Race Communism but looking it up, it seems be one of those White Supremacist dog whistle.

Where in the blue fuck did you get the idea that Woodrow Wilson was a progressive??

Boru

Thats debatable. But all i know is Racism is the same as Opportunism. If one isnt defending itself? Then another group of people wants to kill or rape that group. Thats just how nature works. Just look at the difference between illegal immigration vs legal immigration

With legal immigration, it can be either good or bad. But usually if it doesnt work out, then the guy gets sent back. If the guy adjusts to the culture, language and becomes integrated. Then no problem.

With illegal immigration, it often involves the worst people often. Murderers and rapists. If you want proof? The no background check around immigration during 2015-2016 New Years Eve in Germany. There was also a movie that came out called (Citizen Vigilante) made by Uwe Boll. That adresses the cases of corrupt law enforcement, such as in Britain. Where they would just allow Pakistani rape and grooming gangs to happen, in order to not be called racist.

So sometimes. Its a tool by Race Commies, to either get more power? Or just create a new system imbalance against its own natives.

Either case. Racism is the same as Opportunism. Thats the issue in general.

edit: Woodrow Wilson was a progressive. Thats a literal historical fact!
Progressive era, he was a part of that. Look it up if you think i am lying.

I don't think you're lying (benefit of the doubt and whatnot), you're simply wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodrow_Wilson_and_race

Boru

Being against a strong central government is called federalism.
Communism, rofl, that's something entirely different.

This guy has no idea what he is talking about

Did I understand him correctly in accusing people of "reverse racism" against whites, which often is a means to obfuscate ones own racism?

(August 21, 2026 at 5:03 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Being against a strong central government is called federalism.
Communism, rofl, that's something entirely different.

This guy has no idea what he is talking about

Did I understand him correctly in accusing people of "reverse racism" against whites, which often is a means to obfuscate ones own racism?

You did. You absolutely did.

Boru

Good, thanks Boru.

What i dont get about those racists, those who think they are better than most of us is this: Why arent they proud of it? Why so coy, why the cowardly codespeak? At least they should be proud enough to publicly proclaim their superiority. How am i supposed to buy his racist bullshit if he (the "superior" one) is too much of a coward to openly say so?

Anyway, good to know that if hes correct, according to his silly racist bullshit, i am superior to him anyway. I am more Aryan than he can ever dream to be. Its a clear win/win for me. For him....he seems to be a christian, racist, white supremacist (?), genocide minimizing loser.

They're not sending their best people.

(August 21, 2026 at 6:28 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Good, thanks Boru.

What i dont get about those racists, those who think they are better than most of us is this: Why arent they proud of it? Why so coy, why the cowardly codespeak? At least they should be proud enough to publicly proclaim their superiority. How am i supposed to buy his racist bullshit if he (the "superior" one) is too much of a coward to openly say so?

Anyway, good to know that if hes correct, according to his silly racist bullshit, i am superior to him anyway. I am more Aryan than he can ever dream to be. Its a clear win/win for me. For him....he seems to be a christian, racist, white supremacist (?), genocide minimizing loser.

You argue based on feelings and not facts. This reminds me of a youtube video i saw called ( The Communist Directive 1943: "Label Them a Nazi or Fascist" )

(August 21, 2026 at 1:20 am)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(August 21, 2026 at 12:45 am)PepsiMAX Wrote: I got most of my political science from Deus Ex 2000 game. But i am studying currently at University. So its gonna be interesting to what rhetorics they would argue for, in the framework of Liberal Democracy. I also studied the book called "Battle Cry of Freedom" by James McPherson, relating to the American Civil War.

Here's a good place to start if you're looking for a basic understanding of what political ideologies mean, here's a decent enough place to start: 




Admittedly, there's always going to be some complications in explaining all the nuances, but I can tell you one thing for sure: any political science teacher worth their salt is going to laugh their heads off when you define communism as "anything strong central government."

If i was debating feminism. the guy probably wouldn`t agree on my political theories around feminism. Atleast not in a established sense.

Since i believe it was made as a modern day movement (Or it got breakthrough atleast), simply because technology has made men outdated, and not suitable workers compared to modern techology. And that women could go their seperate ways due to easy lives. In the same way "God is dead" by Nietzsche explains alternative explainations to religions. So did technology for women`s reason to exist. In the sense that they didn`t need a protector anymore, for the sake of easier lives of the past. Because in the modern day, the state, technology and other benefits covers those needs. And so the old ways of doing things, just wasnt needed.

And btw. If anyone falls for the rhetorics that women went their way because of sexism? Which even if the men were? I dont think that was the reason. For the simple reason that "Charlotte Perkins Gilman" wrote a bunch of chauvinist stuff about how women were better than men in everyway, values, ideals etc. Interms of her ideal society would be a feminine society.

Either case. I wouldn`t mind debating that though : D

(August 21, 2026 at 4:49 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(August 21, 2026 at 12:35 am)PepsiMAX Wrote: Thats debatable. But all i know is Racism is the same as Opportunism. If one isnt defending itself? Then another group of people wants to kill or rape that group. Thats just how nature works. Just look at the difference between illegal immigration vs legal immigration

With legal immigration, it can be either good or bad. But usually if it doesnt work out, then the guy gets sent back. If the guy adjusts to the culture, language and becomes integrated. Then no problem.

With illegal immigration, it often involves the worst people often. Murderers and rapists. If you want proof? The no background check around immigration during 2015-2016 New Years Eve in Germany. There was also a movie that came out called (Citizen Vigilante) made by Uwe Boll. That adresses the cases of corrupt law enforcement, such as in Britain. Where they would just allow Pakistani rape and grooming gangs to happen, in order to not be called racist.

So sometimes. Its a tool by Race Commies, to either get more power? Or just create a new system imbalance against its own natives.

Either case. Racism is the same as Opportunism. Thats the issue in general.

edit: Woodrow Wilson was a progressive. Thats a literal historical fact!
Progressive era, he was a part of that. Look it up if you think i am lying.

I don't think you're lying (benefit of the doubt and whatnot), you're simply wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodrow_Wilson_and_race

Boru

https://woodrowwilsonhouse.org/wilson-to...ic-policy/
He was the only American President during the Progressive era to become a president. He did grow up in the South, but was a Northern academic.

(August 21, 2026 at 9:02 am)PepsiMAX Wrote:

(August 21, 2026 at 6:28 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Good, thanks Boru.

What i dont get about those racists, those who think they are better than most of us is this: Why arent they proud of it? Why so coy, why the cowardly codespeak? At least they should be proud enough to publicly proclaim their superiority. How am i supposed to buy his racist bullshit if he (the "superior" one) is too much of a coward to openly say so?

Anyway, good to know that if hes correct, according to his silly racist bullshit, i am superior to him anyway. I am more Aryan than he can ever dream to be. Its a clear win/win for me. For him....he seems to be a christian, racist, white supremacist (?), genocide minimizing loser.

You argue based on feelings and not facts. This reminds me of a youtube video i saw called ( The Communist Directive 1943: "Label Them a Nazi or Fascist" )

You didnt expect i take you serious anymore after this kinda drivel, did you?

(August 20, 2026 at 3:12 pm)PepsiMAX Wrote:  Since Communism is basically anything Strong Central Government. Whether its the Third Reich, USSR, Abraham Lincoln Federalism or EU. The keyword is "collectivism". Elitists, plutocrats and the ultra wealthy

Tell us: Who are those plutocrats.

(August 21, 2026 at 9:21 am)PepsiMAX Wrote:

(August 21, 2026 at 4:49 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I don't think you're lying (benefit of the doubt and whatnot), you're simply wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodrow_Wilson_and_race

Boru

https://woodrowwilsonhouse.org/wilson-to...ic-policy/
He was the only American President during the Progressive era to become a president. He did grow up in the South, but was a Northern academic.

‘He was the only American President during the Progressive era to become a president.’ Whut?

He was also a lifelong segregationist, white supremacist, racist, and apologist for slavery. He was just as racist at Princeton as he was in Virginia.

Boru