NO. Children should be raised by parents who WANT them. Be it a single mom,one with an absent but still involved dad, or two moms and two dads and a plethora of aunts and uncles. Fuck, it is hard enough raising kids sans bloody fucking political brain dead doogooders getting involved

They act like moralists to the camera, but if you ask them money to help couples(or sngle parents FTM), that need money to raise children, they just go: "fuck that, the parents should stop being lazy and work for a living". Its easy to pretend a high moral ground.

Sad but true LP

(March 2, 2012 at 6:23 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: NO. Children should be raised by parents who WANT them. Be it a single mom,one with an absent but still involved dad, or two moms and two dads and a plethora of aunts and uncles. Fuck, it is hard enough raising kids sans bloody fucking political brain dead doogooders getting involved

I don't know what your problem is with the order of the traditional family.
I'm stating that it's best for a child to be raised with both a father and a mother, in a proper family, and I really don't know what actually sounds wrong in my statement.

(March 2, 2012 at 12:00 am)Minimalist Wrote: Part of the tea bagger manifesto is that if you're poor it is your own fucking fault....not the wonderful companies who sent your job to Bangla Desh.

Stark raving lunatics....every last one of them.

Money grabbing greedy bastards from my point of view

"Oh, the poor unborn babies! We must save them...EWWW...get that poor black kid away from me!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rwt3heLriZs

So the lesson here is that if you get knocked up in Wisconsin, better get married to the guy even if he's a worthless bum rather than raise your kid on your own.

(March 5, 2012 at 4:58 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote:

(March 2, 2012 at 6:23 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: NO. Children should be raised by parents who WANT them. Be it a single mom,one with an absent but still involved dad, or two moms and two dads and a plethora of aunts and uncles. Fuck, it is hard enough raising kids sans bloody fucking political brain dead doogooders getting involved

I don't know what your problem is with the order of the traditional family.
I'm stating that it's best for a child to be raised with both a father and a mother, in a proper family, and I really don't know what actually sounds wrong in my statement.

I don't think anyone has a problem with "traditional families". The point is that as long as a child has at least one parent that loves and cares for them, it's better than a mother and a father who don't. I am reading more and more every day about how successful homosexuals have been at parenting. I am both mother and father to my children, and they never want for anything. It's all about love, really. If a person loves their child, they'll get what their child needs by any means necessary.

children have certain financial emotional and social needs. It is easier to manage them when there are two people contributing but it is not impossible to manage as a single parent. It is rather rare that someone ends up as a single parent because of a wonderful positive situation. We should be helping single parents and rewarding them for doing them best, when they do their best, not punishing them for trying

I could have sworn this thread was longer...

Ah well, I think it's asinine.

Fuck, I just envy all the women who get to make a decision in the matter... punish them for being maternal? Fuck that.

(March 8, 2012 at 7:56 am)Vaeolet Lilly Blossom Wrote: I could have sworn this thread was longer...

Nah...most single parents are too busy looking after their kids to reply Vae.