No, I'm not.

(March 18, 2012 at 9:17 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: The thing is, this is just your interpretation of a story in a book. It isn't fact, is it?

We might as well be discussing The Hobbit, as if it is real.

You are free to end your side of the discussion any time you like. If you have a question or even a challenge about this account in Genesis, my role here is to provide clarity. however if you wish to trivialize and dismiss my efforts then you are welcome to do so. I am not here to "prove" anything to you. I am here to clarify and provide the most biblically accurate representation that I can. Do with it as you will.

---

(March 18, 2012 at 9:19 pm)Insanity x Wrote: My only thoughts on what you have just said Drich is that god is so disgusting and immoral that even if there were a reason to believe in it I would tell it to go fuck itself. Seriously how could anyone respect that kind of a god. I would sprint towards the devil knowing at least the devils somewhat fucking consistent.

The rest is just bullshit you sprinkled on the top. god gave them magic food and drink. Cool story bro..

Do you have any other questions about Noah or the account of the flood in Genesis?

(March 18, 2012 at 9:25 pm)Drich Wrote: They were not "people." Not all of them.

Fuck you.. Happened after adam and eve and they were human enough to be people in my eyes. If your god didn't once again he can fuck himself the evil bastard.

Quote:You are confusing Christianity with pre-religion God. These accounts were even before Judaism. Here it seemed God still dealt with people on a fairly personal level.

so your suggestion that "God show up" didn't seem to take with these hybrids.
(Read the Story)

Pre-relgion god was the same god last I heard.. Just a lot more of a cunt. And what the hell are you talking about hybrids? Were adam and eve hybrids? And there is a big difference between turning up thousands of years ago when there is no way of creating evidence of such and event compared to showing up when it would make sense to do so.

If you were right I have no problem with god staying the fuck away where he cant cause harm. He's like a child with a box of matches..

Anyway in a nutshell - Fuck you, your crazy. I'm off to bed.

Clarity? Think you're a bit of an expert huh? At best you can only offer your interpretations of stories, I don't equate that to clarity

(March 18, 2012 at 9:29 pm)Drich Wrote: You are free to end your side of the discussion any time you like. If you have a question or even a challenge about this account in Genesis, my role here is to provide clarity. however if you wish to trivialize and dismiss my efforts then you are welcome to do so. I am not here to "prove" anything to you. I am here to clarify and provide the most biblically accurate representation that I can. Do with it as you will.

Is puking on it OK too?

(March 18, 2012 at 9:23 pm)mediamogul Wrote: Drich I have a question.

What would it take for you to believe that the story of Noah was untrue or at least unsupported by fact?

If God told me it was not true, I suppose there would be little i could say. That said, I do not question the facts or lack of them that support the genesis account of the flood. As i said in the beginning this is a matter of faith.

---

(March 18, 2012 at 9:27 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: No, I'm not.

There you go.

(March 18, 2012 at 9:34 pm)Drich Wrote: If God told me it was not true, I suppose there would be little i could say. That said, I do not question the facts or lack of them that support the genesis account of the flood. As i said in the beginning this is a matter of faith.

No evidence for or against Godzilla. Do you have faith in Godzilla anyway?

Why would we need clarity on bullshit. What kind of sense would it make to find a pile of bullshit in a pasture and say, "Here, let me make this clearer for you."?

It wouldn't make any sense. The bible is full of complete bullshit. You can't prove that it's not bullshit, but it has been proven that it is.

I wonder what kind of person would even want all of that disgusting, horrifying bullshit to be true. How could people love a god that killed everyone on earth, save a few people, all because they were exactly as flawed as he knew they would be, and then apologized to the survivors for making them live on a boat so long by inventing rainbows? Makes sense if you don't think about it, I guess, but as you can see, Drich, most of us are all clear on all that bullshit.

(March 18, 2012 at 9:34 pm)Drich Wrote: If God told me it was not true, I suppose there would be little i could say.

God hasn't told you it IS true, has he? No, no he hasn't...

(March 18, 2012 at 9:34 pm)Drich Wrote:

(March 18, 2012 at 9:23 pm)mediamogul Wrote: Drich I have a question.

What would it take for you to believe that the story of Noah was untrue or at least unsupported by fact?

If God told me it was not true, I suppose there would be little i could say. That said, I do not question the facts or lack of them that support the genesis account of the flood. As i said in the beginning this is a matter of faith.

---

(March 18, 2012 at 9:27 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: No, I'm not.

There you go.

Honestly, that to me summarizes the whole problem with religion. You are using it as proof of itself. What other belief system would you accept on these grounds?

What if I told you that god just told me it wasn't true?