You'd be great on the UN Kyu, with that balanced view of yours.

Coughs

(August 23, 2009 at 8:15 pm)Jon Paul Wrote:

(August 23, 2009 at 7:18 pm)EvidenceVsDelusion Wrote: How do your arguments imply Christ as the son of God/God in human form...called Christ?

Wow. Are you intentionally ignoring what I am saying? I mean, you're not illiterate:

Quote:It has everything to do with Christianity. It has nothing to do with Christs divinity (......) but a lot to do with the ontology of God as seen from the orthodox Christians perspective, and therefore indirectly a lot to do with Christ. Again, you are conflating separate issues as a distraction.

As to the rest: you are just repeating, ad infinitum. I have already answered the very questions and request you have asked; this is a kindergarten and I can't spend any more energy or time on it.

And if you can't spend more time and energy on it as you've said before...why have you been continuing, you gonna stop now or not?

The point is that...how does that imply Christ? You're just saying that the arguments imply Christ...well if they're said to be Christian arguments that doesn't make them Christian unless they argue for Christ, obviously they don't explicitly as you say too of course...but where do they imply it? Oh you just say the argument implies it because it's a Christian argument or whatever....

In those arguments I haven't seen any implication that makes Christ valid in any way.

EvD

(August 24, 2009 at 1:26 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You'd be great on the UN Kyu, with that balanced view of yours.

Least I deal with the real world and not fantasy!

Kyu

(August 24, 2009 at 3:53 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:

(August 24, 2009 at 1:26 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You'd be great on the UN Kyu, with that balanced view of yours.

Least I deal with the real world and not fantasy!

Kyu

I deal with ideas, something that you are presumably saying you can't cope with, and you kindly demonstrate that with some seriously fucked up philosophy. Nice one. You represent pre thinking man. You are the missing link.

(We should have our own thread Kyu to keep this bullshit out of other people's rational conversations)

(August 24, 2009 at 4:51 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:

(August 24, 2009 at 3:53 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: Least I deal with the real world and not fantasy!

I deal with ideas, something that you are presumably saying you can't cope with, and you kindly demonstrate that with some seriously fucked up philosophy. Nice one. You represent pre thinking man. You are the missing link.

You deal with fairy tales, I deal with the world as observed, as testable, as verifiably demonstrable!

I'd rather be a "missing link" than a fucked up philosophical wanker thanks (it's the "missing links" that have achieved not you tossers!)

Kyu

Jon Paul has announced he is 'done' with this. I would like to move forward with where this train is headed if I may.

I will start another thread and ask JP to join me there leaving this subject behind and move forward with his ideology.

(August 24, 2009 at 6:00 pm)Dotard Wrote: Jon Paul has announced he is 'done' with this. I would like to move forward with where this train is headed if I may.

I will start another thread and ask JP to join me there leaving this subject behind and move forward with his ideology.

Obviously, since he fails at every turn to prove anything he says. I would give up after a while if I was doing that.

(August 24, 2009 at 6:53 pm)Eilonnwy Wrote: Obviously, since he fails at every turn to prove anything he says. I would give up after a while if I was doing that.

The facts strangely show the opposite my queen.

Barely asserting bullshit as fact doesn't make it fact...nor does it make it smell any better...

EvD

So if I separate out the bare assertions from the above posts EV you're saying Eilonnwy is talking bullshit right?