(July 21, 2012 at 8:36 am)catfish Wrote:

(July 21, 2012 at 8:32 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: I'm sorry, did you just quote the Bible to try and prove the Bible isn't bullshitting? Can you begin to understand how stupid that is?

It's just as stupid as using the bible to prove that it is bullshitting.

Otherwise, all we have is opinions. I debate facts, not opinions...

I point out fallacies in the Bibles texts. I am ridiculing it for the unfounded nonsense it is. You actually believe that shite.
The onus is upon you to prove it true.
Now answer my question or refuse and prove your ignorance.

(July 21, 2012 at 8:35 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Also:
"Yep, I can answer why he destroyed Soddom. You're talking to an ex-catholic, I've read the Bible cover to cover.
Can't answer why he didn't choose to get the little kids out first though. If you read it no thought of any children in Soddom is even brought up. Either there weren't any, unlikely... or he didn't care. Can't really imagine children being that evil, can you? I mean, can you really imagine seeing children, infants, babies and going "Yep, evil. Time to burn Soddom I guess." I don't think you can."

Answer the question or refuse and prove yourself unable to.

Of course I'm unable to answer that question, I'm not a mind reader.

Do you believe in mind-reading?

---

(July 21, 2012 at 8:40 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: I point out fallacies in the Bibles texts. I am ridiculing it for the unfounded nonsense it is. You actually believe that shite.
The onus is upon you to prove it true.
Now answer my question or refuse and prove your ignorance.

Where did I ever say I believe it? Strawman fallacies abound with you it seems.

(July 21, 2012 at 8:41 am)catfish Wrote:

(July 21, 2012 at 8:35 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Also:
"Yep, I can answer why he destroyed Soddom. You're talking to an ex-catholic, I've read the Bible cover to cover.
Can't answer why he didn't choose to get the little kids out first though. If you read it no thought of any children in Soddom is even brought up. Either there weren't any, unlikely... or he didn't care. Can't really imagine children being that evil, can you? I mean, can you really imagine seeing children, infants, babies and going "Yep, evil. Time to burn Soddom I guess." I don't think you can."

Answer the question or refuse and prove yourself unable to.

Of course I'm unable to answer that question, I'm not a mind reader.

Do you believe in mind-reading?

I'm not asking you to read minds. I'm asking if you, as a supposedly moral person, could look at children... brand them evil... then watch as you slowly burn the life out of them, their brothers, their sisters, their mothers, their fathers... their everything. Could you do it? If you had the power to?

Cat toy, nothing to add on Cain's wife?

Oh well.



Could you also be good enough to explain why god thinks bats are avians and not mammals?

No answer is an answer of sorts Cat, albeit a cowards one. Is that your answer?

(July 21, 2012 at 8:47 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: No answer is an answer of sorts Cat, albeit a cowards one. Is that your answer?

No, I told you I couldn't answer as to God thoughts.

I myself couldn't burn children. But what does that prove?

(July 21, 2012 at 7:54 am)catfish Wrote: Now, to re-iterate my question. Why would you think there was only 3 ppl alive at that time?

The density in your brain is so staggering, and known, that it's a wonder that the lunatics pointed at the LHC as a possible source of a black hole that would devour the Earth.

Fortunately the LHC was never really a threat and your density was relieved when you asked the '3 ppl alive' question. Let me explain. Adam and Eve (not Adam and Steve, thought you'd preciate that), begat (that's biblical for fucked and forgot to pull out) had Cain and Abel. Now, I know this is real fucking hard math, but I'll try to be simple....follow along now....

Adam (1) + Eve (1) = 2. Still with me Christian soldier? Adam and Eve (2) + Cain (1) + Abel (1) = 4. You kids are doing great. I know you want to count to five, but there are no females to fuck, but Mom (Eve) so we can't get to five yet. Cain gets pissed and kills Abel so we now have Adam and Eve (2) + Cain (1) + Abel (1) - Abel (1) = 3. There are still no females but Eve so either Cain fucked his Mom or he fucked his sister (I'm just suggesting the possibility of a minor unknown character). Why is this so hard to imagine? Simple fucking math.

I find the fact that I came from energized pond scum more attractive than tracing my lineage to this incestuous mess.

(July 21, 2012 at 8:51 am)catfish Wrote:

(July 21, 2012 at 8:47 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: No answer is an answer of sorts Cat, albeit a cowards one. Is that your answer?

No, I told you I couldn't answer as to God thoughts.

I myself couldn't burn children. But what does that prove?

That you are moral... but your God is not.
Which raises other questions... if you don't follow your God because he has superior morales... why do you follow him?
Could it be fear? Theres no shame in that, who wouldn't be afraid of burning forever for pissing the big guy off? If you take into account the Bible then thats what can happen on Gods whim whether its deserved or not.
But... what if it wasn't real? What if the fear was unwarranted? What if you could be the moral, good person you wanted to be and live without that fear?
What then?

(July 21, 2012 at 8:43 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Cat toy, nothing to add on Cain's wife?

Oh well.

I've addressed that issue, what more do you want?
Do you still believe there were only 3 ppl at that time?

Ah well, as much fun as this has been, I'm heading to bed as I have to get up early to go riding with the club tomorrow.

So I bid you all adieu till later when we can bat cat toy around some more.