(November 21, 2012 at 8:27 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: Or that you condone the use of innocent children for the use of you getting your jollies?

Not at all. I thought my position on exploitative material was clear by now?

(November 21, 2012 at 8:24 am)Daniel Wrote: I'm sorry, maybe I really am too capitalist. What I mean is how does CP harm society more than "legal" (in the USA and not in Australia) Violent/Extreme BDSM pornographic material? Who views CP? That's right paedophiles. Are they paedophiles because they were exposed to CP (monkey-see-monkey-do)? No. Oh maybe you believe the argument that people exposed to CP will be more likely to commit acts of paedophilia? Well wouldn't that mean people exposed to "simulated rape" would also be more likely to commit acts of rape? My argument is the world has a much bigger problem then CP. And that's the extreme stuff that America is producing. Many more people are exposed to that then to child porn.

This is like saying the Columbine shooters killed their fellow students because of Marilyn Manson and 1st person shooter games. There's a line between fantasy and reality. If someone has problems with that line, there's generally an underlying issue. So should we regulate everything so some people don't get confused? Nay.

(November 21, 2012 at 8:29 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Nice deflection there mate.

Let's move the discussion away from the OP onto an entirely different subject.

And utterly fail to address yet more christian hypocrisy and lies.

You can't point the finger at anyone else, until you clean up your own act. Stop saying that what somebody else does is "so much worse" than what you guys do. Because what you're doing is no better than producing child porn anyway.

(*You is not meant to mean you personally.)

---

(November 21, 2012 at 8:32 am)festive1 Wrote: This is like saying the Columbine shooters killed their fellow students because of Marilyn Manson and 1st person shooter games. There's a line between fantasy and reality. If someone has problems with that line, there's generally an underlying issue. So should we regulate everything so some people don't get confused? Nay.

If that's the point explain the logic in making child porn illegal in the first place. And by child porn I mean what Denmark made* and not "child exploitation material" that paedophiles make.

*And FYI in many places like France owning that stuff isn't even a criminal offence.

(November 21, 2012 at 8:34 am)Daniel Wrote:

(November 21, 2012 at 8:29 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Nice deflection there mate.

Let's move the discussion away from the OP onto an entirely different subject.

And utterly fail to address yet more christian hypocrisy and lies.

You can't point the finger at anyone else, until you clean up your own act. Stop saying that what somebody else does is "so much worse" than what you guys do. Because what you're doing is no better than producing child porn anyway.

(*You is not meant to mean you personally.)

Our own act?? so you're blaming the porn industry on atheists?

At least we don't pretend to be Oh So Moral And Perfect.

(November 21, 2012 at 8:34 am)Daniel Wrote: You can't point the finger at anyone else, until you clean up your own act. Stop saying that what somebody else does is "so much worse" than what you guys do. Because what you're doing is no better than producing child porn anyway.

(*You is not meant to mean you personally.)

Why not?? The Abrahamic religions are FULL of it!! The hypocrisy the llies the cover-ups the psychological damage and fuck wits like you DARE to tell abuse victims like ME that I have to clean up my own act??

You cunt faced mongrel bastard son of an amoeba!!

Grr

(November 21, 2012 at 8:36 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Our own act?? so you're blaming the porn industry on atheists?

At least we don't pretend to be Oh So Moral And Perfect.

No I'm blaming the USA, just like I blame denmark for child porn.

(November 21, 2012 at 8:34 am)Daniel Wrote: If that's the point explain the logic in making child porn illegal in the first place. And by child porn I mean what Denmark made* and not "child exploitation material" that paedophiles make.

*And FYI in many places like France owning that stuff isn't even a criminal offence.

Because, for the millionth time, children are incapable of giving consent. Thereby, any sexual situation they are put in is inherently exploitative. Child porn is illegal because it exploits children. Porn is legal because it is made by consenting adults.

(November 21, 2012 at 8:54 am)Daniel Wrote:

(November 21, 2012 at 8:36 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Our own act?? so you're blaming the porn industry on atheists?

At least we don't pretend to be Oh So Moral And Perfect.

No I'm blaming the USA, just like I blame denmark for child porn.

And you have yet to address the OP.

No matter, I'm finished here anyway.

You have nothing and you keep trying to deflect the thread away from the vile hypocrisy of your religion.

Goodnight.

Once again Daniel avoids one of my posts.

(November 21, 2012 at 9:09 am)Waratah Wrote: Once again Daniel avoids one of my posts.

If we had a dodgeball team on this forum, Daniel would be a first stringer.