(December 5, 2012 at 2:17 am)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote:

(December 5, 2012 at 2:03 am)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: Always with those generalising statements as if you had access to some kind of source of "knowlege" only you can access.

"Back it up" - has become my standerd reply to every post of yours.

Vaffanculo.

Remember your claim? "This scientific claim is false because it was reported in an Italian Catholic newspaper."

So you dont have any valid paper to back it up then?


Well I am not suprised.

(December 5, 2012 at 2:24 am)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote:

(December 5, 2012 at 2:17 am)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: Vaffanculo.

Remember your claim? "This scientific claim is false because it was reported in an Italian Catholic newspaper."

So you dont have any valid paper to back it up then?


Well I am not suprised.

The article cited the work. Read the article, grab the citation, look at the paper.

Suddenly when the science shows you are wrong, your brain becomes merda and you forget how to click a link?

You argued that porn was bad for health.

Your source was a "scientific" coverage by a catholic news agency.

The catholic church being a organisation so delusional and ignorant it doesnt even scare away from stating that condoms cause aids.

The catholic church always cracked down hard on pornography.

So, do you realy believe that that article might not be biased towards the catholic possition?

Ansa is a catholic news agency? Ridiculous nonsense.

It's the equivalent of Reuters in Italy.

And even if it's true that Ansa is a catholic organ, it is reporting a scientific study.

If a Nazi newspaper reports the findings that Climate Change is real, do you discount the claim because it's from a Nazi news organ, or do you verify the science first?

This is common sense stuff, Hans.

Vinny, I am a person who regulary reads scientific papers.

I have had a facination for science, espacialy biology - and that category especialy for genetics and behavioral studies.

As to medical papers - studies over health risks through certain behavior and consumation of certain products - have to be long term studies conducted on a big number of test subjects.

You have failed to provide such a study - on the subject of your antimasturbation rant.

Generaly your insistance on me ignoring your sources as invalid due to them not providing the usualy required standerds set for validity by the scientific comunity can only mean a lack of argument.

I frankly dont know why I am replying to you. This disingenius way of pretending to be an atheist in order to follow what probably is some weird fantasy of yours to convert us is just pathetic and sad.

At least Drich has the guts to stand up to his stuff (most of the times) and state that he`s a christian.

Fritzl, you haven't looked at the paper, so you don't know whether your criticisms are valid.

Your first criticisms were fraud. You claimed Ansa was a Roman Catholic organ, which was fraud.

Undoubtedly, since you haven't read the paper itself, your criticisms are currently fraud.

Any disagreement? Can you say that it's valid to criticize something without reading it? No?

Okay, discussion over. I don't want to talk to racists and I don't want to talk to frauds.

(December 3, 2012 at 2:10 pm)NoMoreExcuses Wrote: OMG as a new atheist convert I checked out Atheist forums, and this place is flat out scary and disgusting!

Filthy language and unbelievable atmosphere of hate!

Filthy language? Oh I am so sorry... you must be referring to my blatant use of 'primrose'. That's my bad, I've been under the weather lately.

Oh, but please do stay ya primrosy rose you!

---

(December 3, 2012 at 2:17 pm)NoMoreExcuses Wrote: Before I would associate with such people, I might have to consider suffering listening to the bull of sermons just to stay around nice clean talking Christians!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmWJu2mGR5U

Clean talking? Only in public, ahahaha

---

(December 3, 2012 at 2:22 pm)NoMoreExcuses Wrote: Disgusting, filthy trash!

Well, it wouldn't get this way if you would just CLEAN YOUR ROOM!

For the fiftieth time, Elliot!

---

(December 3, 2012 at 2:29 pm)NoMoreExcuses Wrote: DECENT 'adults' do not have to resort to using teenage moronic profanities!

No, we don't have to 'resort' to anything. We instead possess the intelligence to abuse profanities in exceedingly creative ways

I've never met a decent adult* who didn't swear.

*By adult, I am assuming you mean someone over the age of 35, because if they are any younger their childishness shines through like fireworks in a glass house.

---

(December 3, 2012 at 2:36 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: Someone said to me once when I was swearing "you're not big and you're not clever"

The thing is, I am big and I am clever.

Soooo, checkmate?

No you ain't a big brotha. Not big whatsoever.

---

(December 3, 2012 at 8:25 pm)Shell B Wrote: Sorry about that, Napo. What is the word for a Christian pretending to be an atheist?

fr0d0, Violet Lilly Blossom, Vinny, y'know... the gang

---

(December 5, 2012 at 2:00 am)jonb Wrote: I don't know, do you wonder why nobody likes you?

I like Vinny

---

(December 5, 2012 at 2:24 am)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: So you dont have any valid paper to back it up then?

All 'papers' are valid evidence. Few of them sound. None of them true.

(December 3, 2012 at 2:10 pm)NoMoreExcuses Wrote: Filthy language and unbelievable atmosphere of hate!

Not mine but I find it a useful principle all the same: "There's no such thing as bad language, only bad people - and they can be bad in any language". Words, by themselves, are harmless. Nobody ever drowned in the word "lake" or was ever shot by the word "gun". What gives words any power they may be perceived to have is the intent behind them. If you are hurt by a simple word like "fuck", in the absence of malicious invective, then I suggest the problem is within you.

(December 3, 2012 at 2:17 pm)NoMoreExcuses Wrote: My story is here,but I won't be coming back to this nasty place full of hate-mongerers!

Mongerers? To me, this sort of linguistic abuse is far more offensive than anything you're whining about.

(December 3, 2012 at 2:17 pm)NoMoreExcuses Wrote: Before I would associate with such people, I might have to consider suffering listening to the bull of sermons just to stay around nice clean talking Christians!

Quite right - rather than knocking about with people who aren't afraid to speak their minds, it's so much healthier to restrict your associations to an elitist clique with delusions of grandeur, among others, who fantasise about a sizeable proportion of humanity (ie anyone who isn't them) being deserving of infinite torture. That's not scary or disgusting in the least.

(December 3, 2012 at 2:22 pm)NoMoreExcuses Wrote:

(December 3, 2012 at 2:19 pm)Napoléon Wrote: Must. Resist. Urge. To say... "FUCK OFF THEN".

Disgusting, filthy trash!

Ugliest thing said in the thread up to this point. Words are neither bad nor good in themselves, only intention can make them so. Referring to a fellow human being as disgusting filthy trash is far more malicious and vitriolic than a mere 'fuck off!'.

---

It's puzzling to me why some people think they can judge whether a person is 'decent' based on their word choices. I suppose they belong to the broader class of people who think words speak louder than actions.

(December 5, 2012 at 6:19 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: Ugliest thing said in the thread up to this point. Words are neither bad nor good in themselves, only intention can make them so. Referring to a fellow human being as disgusting filthy trash is far more malicious and vitriolic than a mere 'fuck off!'.

---

It's puzzling to me why some people think they can judge whether a person is 'decent' based on their word choices. I suppose they belong to the broader class of people who think words speak louder than actions.

This is subjective.

Depends on how sensitive the person is to what comment.