Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 22, 2025, 2:07 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was at least the first life form created?
#51
RE: Was at least the first life form created?
@Eilonnwy

Many posts ago you said: "This is why many people home school their children, so they won't learn science."

I was wondering how many home school families you know personally.

(I am checking into some of the later posts before I respond, if I think appropriate. I just had this question in the back of my mind for a while and thought I would ask.)
Reply
#52
RE: Was at least the first life form created?
Quote:I was wondering how many home school families you know personally.

Only one.

They live in Canada,and their six children are now adults.

Father;atheist,mother vague theist.. They home schooled all of their children until high school,when they went to the local high school,and into French immersion.-parents wanted their children to be bi lingual and to have a solid science ad maths background. (I had the unworthy thought that it might have been because they didn't want teach adolescents)

When the kids went to highs school,they were above age level in every subject except maths,in which they were at age level.

The parents home schooled initially as they didn't like the Canadian primary school system.

I have never met or even heard of anyone here who home schools. I DID know a couple of fruitcakes who sent their two kids to a Montessori school.The children were precocious,odious little sphincters. (to be fair,that was probably more a matter of genetics than education)Devil
Reply
#53
RE: Was at least the first life form created?
(October 16, 2009 at 7:54 pm)rjh4 Wrote: I was wondering how many home school families you know personally.

My friend's fiancée was home schooled, not for religious purpose. I assume you're asking this to see if I have any basis for backing up my statement, and I do--from reports done on home schooling.

I do not believe every home school child has fundamentalist religious parents and are home schooled in order to prevent their children from learning science. Many children are home schooled and excel, that's great. However, it's a well documented fact that many children are home schooled for religious reasons. Here is a good example of what I am referring to:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH_wPUVlJ38

"Science doesn't prove anything." Ughhh, the quote gets me every time, especially when she then goes and uses her am/fm radio and dishwasher that exist thanks to this wonderful thing we call science. Dodgy
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin

::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :Tongueodcast:: Boston Atheists Report
Reply
#54
RE: Was at least the first life form created?
The thing is, they are perfectly correct. Science never proves anything, it gives an explanation that works time and time again, but is never going to reach the level of 'proof' because it relies on the experiment results always being the same.

Science gives a probabilistic view of things, not one of certitude.
Reply
#55
RE: Was at least the first life form created?
Well now you're getting into absolute certainty, which is not possible, and I agree. But in general, that's not the way they mean it and you know it. They're perfectly happy using what science is available to them and when it conflicts with their world view, they ignore it.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin

::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :Tongueodcast:: Boston Atheists Report
Reply
#56
RE: Was at least the first life form created?
(October 17, 2009 at 10:17 am)Eilonnwy Wrote: Well now you're getting into absolute certainty, which is not possible, and I agree. But in general, that's not the way they mean it and you know it. They're perfectly happy using what science is available to them and when it conflicts with their world view, they ignore it.

Wow. Has this subject changed or what?

You said: "This is why many people home school their children, so they won't learn science."

I said: "I was wondering how many home school families you know personally." (and yes I did say this hoping to see if you had any basis for your statement)

You respond by indicating that you personally know one person that was home schooled but not for religious reason. And then you say: "However, it's a well documented fact that many children are home schooled for religious reasons." (I agree, by the way, that that is the reason why many home school.)

Are you suggesting that everyone who home schools for "religious reasons" doesn't want their children to learn science? If so, that is quite a leap based on one aquaintance that your reasoning doesn't apply to and a short video that it could be argued that you are taking what the lady said out of context. Maybe you should find someone who home schools their children for "religious reasons" (I personally hate the phrase "religious" when applied to Christianity the way I see it, but I know how it is being used so I live with it. But that is another conversation.) and ask them if they really want their children not to learn science. By the way...if you don't want to look very far, you can ask me. My wife and I have homeschooled for the past 17 years and you probably would consider our reasons "religious" ones.
Reply
#57
RE: Was at least the first life form created?
(October 17, 2009 at 11:04 am)rjh4 Wrote:
(October 17, 2009 at 10:17 am)Eilonnwy Wrote: Well now you're getting into absolute certainty, which is not possible, and I agree. But in general, that's not the way they mean it and you know it. They're perfectly happy using what science is available to them and when it conflicts with their world view, they ignore it.

Wow. Has this subject changed or what?

You said: "This is why many people home school their children, so they won't learn science."

I said: "I was wondering how many home school families you know personally." (and yes I did say this hoping to see if you had any basis for your statement)

You respond by indicating that you personally know one person that was home schooled but not for religious reason. And then you say: "However, it's a well documented fact that many children are home schooled for religious reasons." (I agree, by the way, that that is the reason why many home school.)

Are you suggesting that everyone who home schools for "religious reasons" doesn't want their children to learn science? If so, that is quite a leap based on one aquaintance that your reasoning doesn't apply to and a short video that it could be argued that you are taking what the lady said out of context. Maybe you should find someone who home schools their children for "religious reasons" (I personally hate the phrase "religious" when applied to Christianity the way I see it, but I know how it is being used so I live with it. But that is another conversation.) and ask them if they really want their children not to learn science. By the way...if you don't want to look very far, you can ask me. My wife and I have homeschooled for the past 17 years and you probably would consider our reasons "religious" ones.

I'm curious. What is your religious reason to home school?



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#58
RE: Was at least the first life form created?
First, I never said everyone who is home schooled is schooled that way for religious reasons. I'm simply saying it is a fact that many religious people home school to deny their children access to education that conflicts with their religious belief. If you do it because you think you can provide a better education, that's fine. But it's a well established fact that religious reasons are often a primary reason, especially among fundamentalists. I'm not hating on home schoolers, I think it's great if parents can do it. However, home schoolers are given different standards and don't have to take standardizing testing, so the statistics on home schoolers doing better is warped. To me that's a problem, and allows some (Note: Not all) fundamentalist religious home schoolers to fall way below basic education standards and deny their child good scientific education, of which the video was an example. I'm quite aware that video is not representative of every home school child everywhere.

Besides, I was only providing a general example about willful ignorance of science. It happens in many other areas, not just home schooling.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin

::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :Tongueodcast:: Boston Atheists Report
Reply
#59
RE: Was at least the first life form created?
Home schoolers do usually have to do standard testing and that's the joke of modern education... schools don't educate they teach to pass tests. They also manipulate the figures to make themselves look good. Education and business don't mix.
Reply
#60
RE: Was at least the first life form created?
(October 18, 2009 at 5:34 am)fr0d0 Wrote: They also manipulate the figures to make themselves look good.

Proof or STFU. Pic's or it didn't happen.
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
[Image: attemptingtogiveadamnc.gif]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I've Created a New Religion Rhondazvous 11 2270 October 12, 2019 at 11:47 am
Last Post: chimp3
Exclamation Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, vaahaa 19 3532 September 18, 2017 at 1:46 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  If God created all the good things around us then it means he created all EVIL too ErGingerbreadMandude 112 25450 March 3, 2017 at 9:53 am
Last Post: Harry Nevis
  Can anyone please refute these verses of Quran (or at least their interpretations)? despair1 34 7498 April 24, 2016 at 4:34 pm
Last Post: ReptilianPeon
  Isn't it at least possible that God isn't a prude? Whateverist 14 4056 July 11, 2015 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  An eternal life is a worthless life. Lucanus 47 14340 December 24, 2014 at 5:11 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life - thunderhulk 30 9062 December 16, 2013 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: Lemonvariable72
  Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life - Jaya Jagannath 15 7058 October 19, 2013 at 10:05 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Who created god? smax 29 8213 May 7, 2013 at 4:26 am
Last Post: smax
  When was evil created? Baalzebutt 26 7964 April 4, 2013 at 10:33 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)