(April 16, 2013 at 1:52 pm)Tonus Wrote: I'm thinking that the type of people who want to do the nasty with 12-year-olds probably don't have much in the way of relevant experience.

Sure we do. Is not there something thrilling about porking the innocent, the weak, the protected?

Sounds to me, rather, that it is inexperience which is so hostile as to bandy the word 'relevant' around.

(April 14, 2013 at 10:13 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: From my personal experience
My wife was not circumcised, till the age of 28 she made it
She was getting a climax very difficulty during intercourse after about 40 minutes
Now after the operation she is getting 3 climaxes in the same period.

Let me get this straight...

Your wife is compelled to undergo a medical procedure simply because you don't know how to fuck properly?

(April 16, 2013 at 2:07 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: I'll go with 9 years old to start with on that one.

Really? I know a girl who says she was giving blowjobs by six.

I know I was manipulating boys to stick their dicks in soap bottles (sans lid) by six.

What's so special about being nine? Or fifty? Is it not some *underlying non-age attributes* which you refer to instead... or are you just that pig-headed?

Age lines, man. Never got them, still don't get them.

(April 16, 2013 at 4:46 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: I know I was manipulating boys to stick their dicks in soap bottles (sans lid) by six.

So.... you've been busy.

(April 16, 2013 at 4:46 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote:

(April 16, 2013 at 2:07 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: I'll go with 9 years old to start with on that one.

Really? I know a girl who says she was giving blowjobs by six.

I know I was manipulating boys to stick their dicks in soap bottles (sans lid) by six.

What's so special about being nine? Or fifty? Is it not some *underlying non-age attributes* which you refer to instead... or are you just that pig-headed?

Age lines, man. Never got them, still don't get them.

It's a mental thing, in the vast vast majority 6 year olds and 9 year olds are not capable of understanding sexual choices. They aren't capable of consent. The only people I've ever heard argue otherwise are people who themselves are attracted to children. Even if a tiny percentage are capable of consent, I'm more than willing to sacrifice a few years of sexual activity for a tiny percentage of children in order to protect the rest of them. Age of consent laws, by in large, are good laws.

(April 16, 2013 at 5:19 pm)frz Wrote:

(April 16, 2013 at 4:46 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: I know I was manipulating boys to stick their dicks in soap bottles (sans lid) by six.

So.... you've been busy.

Exceptionally lacking in the business lately.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2blcwT5BQ4

The Lord doesn't seem to have much mercy for the fishermen... but he sure does enjoy seeing them suffer.

---

(April 16, 2013 at 5:28 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: It's a mental thing, in the vast vast majority 6 year olds and 9 year olds are not capable of understanding sexual choices. They aren't capable of consent.

It is a mental thing, but then: so is everything. You state that some massive amount more 6 and 9 year olds aren't even capable of understanding sexual choices... I believe this is suspect. Do you have any data to support this claim? After all, I had a sexual education class in 5th grade (I was 10)... and the other girls in class had had that class one year previous (many of them were nine). I happen to remember pretty clearly that when I asked to join in (I had thought it was for tea, in my defense): I was quickly shot down by the rest of my classmates, that I didn't want to go.

If someone's ready to educate someone by the age of nine, I should think that at least capable of understanding the subject matter. If someone is masturbating to manipulating boys sexually for her own appeasement by the age of six, I should think that they are at least capable of understanding what it is they are doing. Especially when they've masturbated with their sister already Among other things... NOW: I am a very ordinary person, are you suggesting to me that my rate of the understanding of things is considerably higher than that of the vast vast majority of other persons?

And I disagree on the matter of consent, since they are plenty capable of consent... they've only been screaming "NO" since they were two.

Quote:The only people I've ever heard argue otherwise are people who themselves are attracted to children.

You've got me...



I don't find most children attractive... just the attractive ones. Same for adults, dogs, and irish men.

Quote:Even if a tiny percentage are capable of consent, I'm more than willing to sacrifice a few years of sexual activity for a tiny percentage of children in order to protect the rest of them. Age of consent laws, by in large, are good laws.

Do you exactly see protesters in the streets screaming for arbitrary 'age of consent' lines to be enacted earlier?

Adults are alone with children often, considered to be responsible for their wellbeing... often. In most cases, when the child is having sex with these people and not enjoying it and not consenting to it: word gets out pretty fast. Whether an age line is drawn or not: rape remains a punishable offense.

And it's not like the age line is stopping it from happening

Age laws are gates, made by those ignorant to the reasoning behind the fence's construction. My question: why is there a fence constructed in the first place?

(April 16, 2013 at 4:43 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: Sure we do. Is not there something thrilling about porking the innocent, the weak, the protected?

What is this "porking" you speak of? Does it involve a smoker and dry rub?

Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote:Sounds to me, rather, that it is inexperience which is so hostile as to bandy the word 'relevant' around.

Pfft. The inexperienced know not of relevance. They think it's a cosmetics company.

(April 16, 2013 at 6:36 pm)Tonus Wrote: What is this "porking" you speak of? Does it involve a smoker and dry rub?

Whether the rub be dry or wet is situational. Sometimes it involves a smoker (or heaven forbid: two+).

As for what porking is... well, I can answer that in a lot of ways. This is the way I chose, this time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVWMAgErKOA

Quote:Pfft. The inexperienced know not of relevance. They think it's a cosmetics company.

Aha, so I was right.

They're zombies.

(April 16, 2013 at 4:46 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote:

(April 16, 2013 at 2:07 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: I'll go with 9 years old to start with on that one.

Really? I know a girl who says she was giving blowjobs by six.

I know I was manipulating boys to stick their dicks in soap bottles (sans lid) by six.

What's so special about being nine? Or fifty? Is it not some *underlying non-age attributes* which you refer to instead... or are you just that pig-headed?

Age lines, man. Never got them, still don't get them.

I guess you think pedophilia as we know it isn't such a bad thing then?

(April 16, 2013 at 8:27 pm)paulpablo Wrote: I guess you think pedophilia as we know it isn't such a bad thing then?

Depends... what is pedophilia as the unknown 'we' know it?

My opinion of pedophilia is neutral, just as my position of any element of sexuality is neutral (barring specifically lesbians and bisexual women, because I've a vested personal interest in the matter). Is there are particular reason that you consider it to be 'such a bad thing'?