lol.. society says that morals are transitory. either they do or they don't get with it.

(May 28, 2013 at 9:59 pm)dazzn Wrote: good for you. and?

....and I'll take my Blue Peter Badge now, please?

meh, i don't watch geeky shows.

---

(May 28, 2013 at 11:30 am)cato123 Wrote:

(May 28, 2013 at 11:26 am)dazzn Wrote: lol.. the same society says one merely chooses his or her own personal ethics.

Try again.

i have a right to my personal ethics. you all cite the same, don't you? lol.

---

(May 28, 2013 at 11:31 am)wwjs Wrote: I really hope that you're trolling because otherwise you're a threat to society and you should immediately seek some professional help

so morals are transitory, yet threats to society need to be curtailed?

people choose their persoal morals. i don't get why this is so bad.

I'd hate to meet you on the highway...

morals are transitory. get with the programme..

---

(May 28, 2013 at 11:11 am)pocaracas Wrote:

(May 28, 2013 at 11:04 am)dazzn Wrote: Who says we cannot do as we please to persons who deny what we want?

Golden rule: One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself.

Silver rule: One should not treat others in ways that one would not like to be treated

(May 28, 2013 at 11:04 am)dazzn Wrote: most deny me normal knowledge, when it's patently clear that this
exists.

Do you really want to hear it from your father how it feels to fuck your mother?

Some information should just be off limits. Leave it be.

if i want standard knowledge, who are you to deny me? hmm?

Laws are heuristic, so when your flibbity flobity noodly understanding of morals intersects the laws of your area, you will find out that much of morality is codified into law, then interpreted by courts.

we make our own personal morality. why is that so fucking difficult to comprehend?

if people deny me freedom, MY personal ethics says they warrant punishment.

Would you prefer to live in a land without order?

We have laws and moral standards so we can co-exist with each other.

(May 28, 2013 at 10:30 pm)Polaris Wrote: Would you prefer to live in a land without order?

We have laws and moral standards so we can co-exist with each other.

lol.. who the hell are you to condemn anybody?

Morals are transitory and don't exist. get with it. if i wish to destroy others who deny me my freedom, who are you to say otherwise? what makes your opinion so absolute?

dazzn Wrote:Who says it's wrong to push a 21 year old girl? You?

I do. Whether or not you agree is not the issue I was trying to point out. What I was trying to explain to you is that there are consequences for our actions, regardless of whether we agree on the issue of their morality. You seem to think that you have the right to do as you please, and no one has the right to stop you or make you face the consequences, but that is not the case.

dazzn Wrote:what makes your morals so supreme?

Nothing.

dazzn Wrote:People do as they please in life. get with it, and nobody really has the right to deny me what i want.

And this is where you are oh so horribly wrong and will probably one day suffer for this belief(assuming, of course, that you actually believe the shit you spout and are not trying to parody what you believe are the logical conclusions of atheism, as I have suspected all along).

People absolutely have the right to deny you what you want if what you want infringes on their freedom.