http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm1EMF8fiTc

The guy who outright rails and screams at McCain is my hero of the week. And he fucking calls it. Were any average non-politician American in power, these shitheads would all be going to prison for treason, or at least going to court for it.

Also I remember that speech about the documentation that stated we're going to be committing operations throughout the middle east to destabilize it. The goal, as I recall, is to do away with the current government systems, which are entrenched and utterly despotic, in an attempt to open the region up to better trade and economic opportunities, in an attempt to kickstart the lagging global economy.

This thing about going to war in Syria, however, is just not a good idea. Even my brother, who is a very loyal soldier, is telling me that he's considering retiring if the US deploys troops there...and he's spent his entire career so far looking to a position in the brass. Idealist that he is, he has reasons for that outside of mere prestige.

It's all about the oil.



I thought you guys knew that.

(September 10, 2013 at 6:56 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: The guy who outright rails and screams at McCain is my hero of the week.

He claimed that Al Qeada is responsible for the chemical weapons attacks, which is a claim I am extremely skeptical about given that the only source I've been able to find on that claim comes from the Assad camp itself.

I hate people who put "dramatic" music into the background of their videos believing that this puts weight under their "arguments".

This video is rubbish, it is worthless conspiracy crap.

(September 10, 2013 at 8:03 am)The Germans are coming Wrote: I hate people who put "dramatic" music into the background of their videos believing that this puts weight under their "arguments".

Where did the video creator state that exactly?

So IS the Obama administration invading Syria?

(September 10, 2013 at 8:20 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: So IS the Obama administration invading Syria?

No.

A fiew air and missle strikes are certainly not an "invasion".

Invasion would be to send troops in for the purpose of conquest.

Here, the purpose of the missle and air strikes clearly is to "punish" a regime for it`s use of chemical weapons.

The words "invasion", "no evidence" and "Al Quaida" are simply thrown arround by the Alex Jones braindead conspiracy club and the Ron Paul friends of sociopaths society.

In all honesty, I don't think there is enough evidence to invade syria. There isn't enough evidence that it was the regime that killed those civilians. If we had that evidence we would be waving it about our heads for everyone to see. Since the governments aren't doing that, i can only assume that we don't have evidence. But on the other hand, revealing the evidence could maybe expose spys in syria or something idk.
Also we need to consider motivations. Assad knows that the world is watching him, it would be a ridiculous act of stupidity to gas his own people, he knows that action would be taken against him. This makes it seem unlikely that he would do it. Then again, he could just be a crazy psychopath and so he did it.
Also, look at the rebels. They could have done it too. Maybe they got so desperate that they gassed those civilians to frame Assad, that way the world would have to act and support them. On the other hand, these rebels are just normal people, they are essentially civilians with guns. I doubt they could do that to their own people. Unless it was conducted up in the higher chain of command and kept from the grunts?
Needless to say, if Assad did gas those civillians, there is no question that he has to be taken down. For things to change, some people have to die. The problem is the evidence.
What do you guys think?

The USofA should stop being the "world police"