(October 4, 2013 at 11:18 am)Chas Wrote:

(October 4, 2013 at 10:46 am)Godschild Wrote: You are what's wrong, you and others read into what we say what you want to believe, I do not judge yet you read into what I write as judgement. You say I write with a condescending attitude, nope, you're reading that into it. It's you who can not see you're the one who wants to believe I do this.

GC

---

Your mistaken sir, no proof has been given, period.

Gc

Convincing evidence has been given. There is no evidence for the Genesis creation stories while there is a great deal of evidence for naturalistic explanations.

I haven't seen anything to discredit the creation, you give only your babble and babble counts as nothing.

GC

(October 4, 2013 at 12:42 pm)Esquilax Wrote:

(October 4, 2013 at 10:46 am)Godschild Wrote: Your mistaken sir, no proof has been given, period.

Gc

Incidentally, would you like to retract the claim you made on the previous page, and admit you were wrong, since I did give proof that you were?

I mean, that would be the honest thing to do, from a man clearly so respectful of the primacy of evidence, wouldn't it?

Evidence to a theist is an allergy. They like being congested with myth and a shot of reality would really fuck up their day.

(October 4, 2013 at 12:40 pm)Brian37 Wrote:

(October 4, 2013 at 11:18 am)Chas Wrote: Convincing evidence has been given. There is no evidence for the Genesis creation stories while there is a great deal of evidence for naturalistic explanations.

Any book that treats the sun and moon as separate sources of light, any book that pops adult men suddenly out of dirt, and pops an adult woman out of a man's rib, can only be considered a comic book.

It simply bothers believers that facts get in the way of their fantasy.

Discounting the power of God does not change the facts of creation.

GC

(October 4, 2013 at 1:15 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Evidence to a theist is an allergy. They like being congested with myth and a shot of reality would really fuck up their day.

I'm not really expecting a retraction, I just wanted the fact that there wasn't one highlighted in the record, so that the next time GC tries to act like he cares about evidence, we can show just how much of a lie that is.

If there's one thing a creationist can never do, it's admit wrongdoing.

(October 4, 2013 at 1:15 pm)Godschild Wrote:

(October 4, 2013 at 12:40 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Any book that treats the sun and moon as separate sources of light, any book that pops adult men suddenly out of dirt, and pops an adult woman out of a man's rib, can only be considered a comic book.

It simply bothers believers that facts get in the way of their fantasy.

Discounting the power of God does not change the facts of creation.

GC

See if you can spot the pattern.

"Discounting the power of Allah does not change the facts of creation"
"Discounting the flood of Gilgamesh does not change the facts of creation"
"Discounting the sun being a god does not change that Ra being a god"
"Discounting Thor being a god does not mean lightening was not created by him"

"Discounting a Lamborghini god does not change George Washington farted one out of his ass".

I have an invisible pink unicorn in the trunk of my car too, since you can't prove there is not, it is invisible.

---

(October 4, 2013 at 1:20 pm)Esquilax Wrote:

(October 4, 2013 at 1:15 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Evidence to a theist is an allergy. They like being congested with myth and a shot of reality would really fuck up their day.

I'm not really expecting a retraction, I just wanted the fact that there wasn't one highlighted in the record, so that the next time GC tries to act like he cares about evidence, we can show just how much of a lie that is.

If there's one thing a creationist can never do, it's admit wrongdoing.

Well, look at the asshole they worship. It is your fault for the game their god didn't have to set up in the first place.

(October 4, 2013 at 1:15 pm)Godschild Wrote: Discounting the power of God does not change the facts of creation.

GC

Neither does the non-existent power of your non-existent god
hock:

GC,

So by what tests would creation be falsifiable in your opinion?

(October 4, 2013 at 5:59 pm)Brakeman Wrote: GC,

So by what tests would creation be falsifiable in your opinion?

Argument with this one is futile- just warning you...

(October 4, 2013 at 6:59 pm)Searching4truth Wrote:

(October 4, 2013 at 5:59 pm)Brakeman Wrote: GC,

So by what tests would creation be falsifiable in your opinion?

Argument with this one is futile- just warning you...

Probably, but I want him to realize that he is arguing for unfair field advantage.
If he is even unwilling to consider the tests, then he must realize that he is just an empty propagandist.

A real god would have better spokesmen than just empty propagandists.

Oh look, a whole day went by, several posts from GC, and not one of them even an acknowledgement that I even called him out.

Standard dishonesty, then.