Posts: 3817
Threads: 5
Joined: November 19, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 26, 2013 at 9:10 am
(October 26, 2013 at 1:00 am)Polaris Wrote: Yeah continue lying like your former President Bush, you dishonest shithead. You're a lying sack of shit, goober. Or maybe you're a fucking retard who mistakes state-sponsored atheism (which ends up being a religion for all intensive purposes) for being atheism.
![[Image: GrammarNaziTiny.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.acbeddoe.com%2Fphotos%2Fatheism%2FGrammarNaziTiny.jpg)
"for all intents and purposes"
You're welcome.
![[Image: coffeedrinker.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.acbeddoe.com%2Fphotos%2Fpublic%2Fcoffeedrinker.gif)
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 26, 2013 at 10:30 am
Thanks Chas, you saved me the trouble. Have a kudos.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 10693
Threads: 15
Joined: September 9, 2011
Reputation:
119
RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 26, 2013 at 11:06 am
(This post was last modified: October 26, 2013 at 11:06 am by Mister Agenda.)
I think the bar should be that someone has to prove that theism is a religion before they get to try to pull it on atheism.
Posts: 579
Threads: 3
Joined: October 18, 2013
Reputation:
14
RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 26, 2013 at 11:54 am
I kinda like the idea of having an intensive purpose
Posts: 2610
Threads: 22
Joined: May 18, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 31, 2013 at 8:08 pm
(October 26, 2013 at 9:10 am)Chas Wrote: (October 26, 2013 at 1:00 am)Polaris Wrote: Yeah continue lying like your former President Bush, you dishonest shithead. You're a lying sack of shit, goober. Or maybe you're a fucking retard who mistakes state-sponsored atheism (which ends up being a religion for all intensive purposes) for being atheism.
"for all intents and purposes"
You're welcome.
Thanks. One of the English phrases I tend to get incorrect.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Why atheism always has a burden of proof
October 31, 2013 at 8:40 pm
(October 28, 2013 at 1:09 pm)Esquilax Wrote: An intensive purpose would be a quick one, whereas an intense purpose would be a hard or powerful one. Mixing up the two could be dangerous!
An intensive purpose would in fact be a thorough one, which rather implies anything other than haste.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
![[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i629.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu13%2FRXM843%2F146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif)
