I said nothing about religion.

(October 28, 2013 at 10:06 pm)catfish Wrote:

(October 28, 2013 at 12:06 am)Esquilax Wrote: Name one freedom being taken away. One.

1. The freedom to chose when and how your child learns about homosexual relationships.

2. The freedom to chose whether or not your daughter has to get vaccinated for an STD @ 10 years old.

But. The question went back to "how is secularism oppressing Christianity?" Which seemed to have mutated into how is secularism oppressing religious views.

Or did I miss a few posts?

(October 29, 2013 at 7:18 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: But. The question went back to "how is secularism oppressing Christianity?" Which seemed to have mutated into how is secularism oppressing religious views.

Or did I miss a few posts?

Quote:Au contraries. It's the Christians who are tired of the liberal religion of secularism leveraging their way on legislation that has us so frustrated and peeling away all ur freedoms.

Says nothing about religious freedom explicitly.

(October 29, 2013 at 7:00 am)catfish Wrote: I said nothing about religion.

(October 28, 2013 at 10:06 pm)catfish Wrote: 1. The freedom to chose when and how your child learns about homosexual relationships.

2. The freedom to chose whether or not your daughter has to get vaccinated for an STD @ 10 years old.

The original question was about how secularism affects Christianity. Secularism means the absence of religion, so the reference to religion is implicit in the very definition of the words. So yes, either you did reference religion or you're addressing some phantom comments other than those which you did address. (Or, more likely, you're trying to make a stupid semantic argument to evade actually having to defend your original postings.)

(October 29, 2013 at 7:25 am)catfish Wrote:

Quote:Au contraries. It's the Christians who are tired of the liberal religion of secularism leveraging their way on legislation that has us so frustrated and peeling away all ur freedoms.

Says nothing about religious freedom explicitly.

He basically did, actually.

(October 29, 2013 at 7:27 am)apophenia Wrote:

(October 29, 2013 at 7:00 am)catfish Wrote: I said nothing about religion.

The original question was about how secularism affects Christianity. Secularism means the absence of religion, so the reference to religion is implicit in the very definition of the words. So yes, either you did reference religion or you're addressing some phantom comments other than those which you did address. (Or, more likely, you're trying to make a stupid semantic argument to evade actually having to defend your original postings.)

Please pay attention to what I and he wrote.

Quote:Au contraries. It's the Christians who are tired of the liberal religion of secularism leveraging their way on legislation that has us so frustrated and peeling away all ur freedoms.

Seriously, why is simple English so hard to understand?

---

I picked two non religious freedoms. Just because they're sexual in nature does not make them religious, that's your classification, not mine.

---

(October 29, 2013 at 7:29 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote:

(October 29, 2013 at 7:25 am)catfish Wrote: Says nothing about religious freedom explicitly.

He basically did, actually.

ok, let's unban him and ask if he meant "your" or if he ommited an o in "our"???

(October 29, 2013 at 7:31 am)catfish Wrote: Please pay attention to what I and he wrote.

Quote:Au contraries. It's the Christians who are tired of the liberal religion of secularism leveraging their way on legislation that has us so frustrated and peeling away all ur freedoms.

Seriously, why is simple English so hard to understand?

I don't know, catfish, why is simple English so hard for you to understand correctly. Maybe you should go back to grammar school and learn what a fucking antecedent is. Or maybe you should spend less time equivocating, splitting hairs, and making up non-existent distinctions just so you can be a dick instead of actually answering the motherfucking question?

I don't know, nor particularly care. You play these games just to get attention because you 'apparently' feel it takes some skill or talent to piss people off, despite the fact that it's little more than pathetic, anti-social trolling, and at bottom, you're just a pathetic attention whore.

*Looks up*

Nailed it.

(October 29, 2013 at 7:54 am)apophenia Wrote:

(October 29, 2013 at 7:31 am)catfish Wrote: Please pay attention to what I and he wrote.


Seriously, why is simple English so hard to understand?

I don't know, catfish, why is simple English so hard for you to understand correctly. Maybe you should go back to grammar school and learn what a fucking antecedent is. Or maybe you should spend less time equivocating, splitting hairs, and making up non-existent distinctions just so you can be a dick instead of actually answering the motherfucking question?

I don't know, nor particularly care. You play these games just to get attention because you 'apparently' feel it takes some skill or talent to piss people off, despite the fact that it's little more than pathetic, anti-social trolling, and at bottom, you're just a pathetic attention whore.

lol, why do you guys usually assume "religion" and get pissed when I tell you it's not?

I think at this point it isn't so much what you say, but how you go about it.