USA didn't create Al qaeda or the Taliban, read a fucking book you retard. Why would they fund them and invade them to remove them. In the most recent theatre of conflict the US were dishing out support to other groups such as the northern alliance (predominantly Turkic ethnic groups and other non-pashtun minorities). If you believe that the USA empowers the Taliban rather than actual regional supporters such as the ISI then you are a complete berk. You have a 16 year old's conspiracy theorist grasp on world affairs. Al Qaeda formed out of the ashes of various anti-communist resistance groups, America provided limited support very early on but to this day the regional groups rely much more on support from within Pakistan and the gulf states, USUALLY to the annoyance of the USA who is constantly at odds with the Pakistani intelligence agency in particular. Read Jason Burke or literally anything on this theatre of conflict that is written by real journalists/reporters who actually research and source shit. Your dumbass internet research is making you look that bit more of a tard.

How does something restrictive offer empowerment? The hijab is used by sexually frustrated dickheads like you to cover up women because you're too illogical to simply look the other way. Muslim men are sexually repressed idiots and so are you.

(November 29, 2013 at 5:03 pm)pocaracas Wrote:

(November 29, 2013 at 4:39 pm)Sleepy Wrote: Russia is enemies with Al Qaeda and Taliban as well. They don't provide and type of support to them.

So... where do the AK's come from?
Where are they manufactured? And the bullets...?

Russia supports Arab dictators like Assad and saddam. As for ak-47s, those aren't made in Russia anymore, they are mass produced everywhere in the world.

Beat me to it!

Quote:Why would they fund them and invade them to remove them.

We have a long sad history of doing exactly that. Comes from not knowing what the fuck we want to do.

I'd say it stems from short-sightedness, but I agree with the overall sentiment

(November 29, 2013 at 1:58 pm)Sleepy Wrote: Hijab empowers women but the hug arab countries do not represent Islam. The governments fund Al Qaeda and Taliban with the US who created these groups.

---

Maybe you might want for people recognize for your appearance.

But people of character recognize others for their character and it's the character of a person that is most valuable and recognizable.

You are just the type of person al Qaeda et al look to recruit. Idiots who can easily be brainwashed and told that their actions will lead them to paradise.

You sure you're not already a member? And that you're here to to build up some zeal against the kafir bastards?

(November 29, 2013 at 10:40 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

Quote:Why would they fund them and invade them to remove them.

We have a long sad history of doing exactly that. Comes from not knowing what the fuck we want to do.

This is certainly documented but differs quite significantly from the examples of Afghanistan. The US did offer material and intelligence support to Iraq throughout the 1980s, the difference being that they ceased this support by the time of the first gulf because Hussein had essentially stopped playing ball. What Sleepy the imbecile is suggesting is that the US are STILL funding the Taliban and Al Qaeda, at the same time as launching a millitary offensive to remove them, which is utterly ludicrous. Even the US dispelled any illusion that it liked Saddam any more as it was actively bombing his palace in 2003, even if it did have to conceed that it was once quite friendly with the brute. Make no mistake, the USA and its allies have a long history of supporting tyrants the world over, particularly in south and central america, but Sleepy's notion that at this second the USA is controlling Al Qaeda and Taliban activities (presumably in Afghanistan and Pakistan) is quite ridiculous, and typical of the retarded muslim conspiracy videos that are plastered all over youtube. As he has also failed to realise, by 2001 the USA was offering material support to other groups within Afghanistan with a view to destabilise the Taliban.

The corporate elite do not care about the loss of soldiers of the US, civilians of here or civilians of anywhere

That guy is absolutely right. AK's are made everywhere including by small children in villages in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Maybe it's the homosexuality that has clouded most of your minds.

Make the choice to go back to being straight. Get off the deviated, unnatural, unearthly of performing and maintaining homosexual activity in your lives.
Most of the individuals attempting to respond to me here are most likely homosexuals themselves and line of thinking is already unearthly, devilish and illogical but I know there are atheists with at least a bit of logic to realize homosexuality is unnatural and it is a choice when that person partakes in those activities.

---

The drug trade of heroin has risen to
More then 100 billion since the US invaded sghnistan.

(November 29, 2013 at 11:50 am)Sleepy Wrote: No I never said that actually. Those animals that do it occasionally does not indicate it's part of their nature, rather it's unnatural as well because at the end of the day they're looking for mates. And it's not in every animal of a species, it will be rare an for a short period of time.
I never stated I support lesbians.

Lying an being deceptive will not get you anywhere besides hell.

At the end of the day animals in natural circumstances involve themselves in homosexual activity so why do you decide it isn't natural?

Homosexuals spreading AIDs isn't a good argument because straight people pass on more AIDs than lesbians.