(December 21, 2013 at 5:48 am)λάθε βιώσας Wrote: I am willing to wager that a cigar is theistic in nature

Actually cigars are more phallic in nature. Just ask Monica Lewinsky.

Alternately, just skip the symbolism entirely and go right to blowjobs. If you get a little reciprocation going, I guarantee it'll be more satisfying than smoking, no matter how fancy you look doing it.

(December 21, 2013 at 2:26 am)Esquilax Wrote:

(December 21, 2013 at 12:43 am)snowtracks Wrote: when one of your own gets wounded by the truth, the word goes out to the cabal to try to overpower with volume, pretty weak response but at least it shows an attempt - - - and don't forget the kudos.

What truth would this be? You haven't presented anything demonstrably true, nor any evidence that would lead one to verify the things you say as true. You just keep rambling on about time dimensions and demons, like we're obligated to take you seriously just because you shoot your mouth off.

Oh, and incidentally, continuing to play the martyr card after being called on it doesn't make your case any more compelling, especially when your case is "everyone is against me." This is just sad.

"obligated to take you seriously" - that's completely self-imposed. please give yourself permission to release yourself from this burden.

(December 21, 2013 at 2:18 pm)snowtracks Wrote: "obligated to take you seriously" - that's completely self-imposed. please give yourself permission to release yourself from this burden.

I am sure that, with time and deep meditation, I can disabuse myself from this belief, that's so core to my being.

Why did this thread that started out with the 'god-of-the-gaps' argument go on for 66 pages?

I want to get involved, but I don't want to read all that. Anyone got a cliff notes version of it for me?

(December 21, 2013 at 2:44 pm)TaraJo Wrote: Why did this thread that started out with the 'god-of-the-gaps' argument go on for 66 pages?

I want to get involved, but I don't want to read all that. Anyone got a cliff notes version of it for me?

It's bullshit all the way down. Just jump in anywhere. Snowtracks is trying valiantly the "proof by bare assertion" route.

(December 21, 2013 at 10:32 am)Esquilax Wrote: Alternately, just skip the symbolism entirely and go right to blowjobs. If you get a little reciprocation going, I guarantee it'll be more satisfying than smoking, no matter how fancy you look doing it.

I dunno. I've had some fairly rubbish blowjobs, and some f***ing amazing smokes....

Having a fantastic cigar whilst enjoying a blowjob, now THERE is something for the bucket list.

(December 21, 2013 at 2:46 pm)rasetsu Wrote: It's bullshit all the way down. Just jump in anywhere. Snowtracks is trying valiantly the "proof by bare assertion" route.

I noticed. He still seems to be relying on the god-of-the-gaps argument, too.

Truth: Science not knowing something just means that science doesn't know it; it doesn't mean god automatically did it. So, for example, if science doesn't understand dark energy, you can't just come in and say "God did it." Because in another 30-50 years, when we DO understand dark energy, where will god be then? Or are you suggesting we not study something anymore simply because "god did it?" I have no desire to cripple our scientific advancements like that. I want to learn as much as we can about the world and how it works, not just sit with our eyes covered, insisting it was all god and we don't need to look any further.

(December 21, 2013 at 2:52 pm)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: Having a fantastic cigar whilst enjoying a blowjob, now THERE is something for the bucket list.

On the flipside, getting a blowjob from someone who is smoking a cigar just leads to unpleasant burns and ash stains. It's not something you want to mix up.

Just doesn't bear thinking about does it.