(January 25, 2014 at 9:02 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: That is why I believe we need eugenics to breed better, more individualistic people before the state can be abolished.

Good idea. Let's start the eugenics program by killing off the Jews.

(January 25, 2014 at 9:06 pm)TaraJo Wrote:

(January 25, 2014 at 9:02 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: That is why I believe we need eugenics to breed better, more individualistic people before the state can be abolished.

Good idea. Let's start the eugenics program by killing off the Jews.

No, you should be ashamed of yourself for even suggesting that as a joke! How about we start by killing trannies?

(January 25, 2014 at 9:07 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 25, 2014 at 9:06 pm)TaraJo Wrote: Good idea. Let's start the eugenics program by killing off the Jews.

No, you should be ashamed of yourself for even suggesting that as a joke! How about we start by killing trannies?

I'm not the one suggesting a eugenics program.

(January 25, 2014 at 9:11 pm)TaraJo Wrote:

(January 25, 2014 at 9:07 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: No, you should be ashamed of yourself for even suggesting that as a joke! How about we start by killing trannies?

I'm not the one suggesting a eugenics program.

Eugenics does not have to involve killing anyone.

Question, Ego: While TaraJo's comment about killing off Jews was clearly facetious, would you, as part of your eugenics pogrom, support euthanizing defectives who happened to be Jewish?

Hypothetically, suppose Avram is a lifelong fervent supporter of the Likud party as well a a devoutly conservative Jew. He clearly doesn't have the individualistic traits you're wanting to breed for, so would he be one of your culls?

Boru

---

(January 25, 2014 at 9:16 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 25, 2014 at 9:11 pm)TaraJo Wrote: I'm not the one suggesting a eugenics program.

Eugenics does not have to involve killing anyone.

Then why did you suggest killing trannies?

Boru

Raptor stop putting your foot in your mouth and trying to discuss things you most certainly don't understand. Go play Call of Duty or something.

(January 25, 2014 at 9:19 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Question, Ego: While TaraJo's comment about killing off Jews was clearly facetious, would you, as part of your eugenics pogrom, support euthanizing defectives who happened to be Jewish?

Hypothetically, suppose Avram is a lifelong fervent supporter of the Likud party as well a a devoutly conservative Jew. He clearly doesn't have the individualistic traits you're wanting to breed for, so would he be one of your culls?

Boru

---

(January 25, 2014 at 9:16 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: Eugenics does not have to involve killing anyone.

Then why did you suggest killing trannies?

Boru

I would not support the euthanasia of anyone. I support the voluntary sterilization of the retarded (shouldn't be hard to convince them to go along with it). I support the government paying stupid people to be voluntarily sterilized. I support the compulsory sterilization of mass murderers.

I was making a point & being facetious by suggesting killing trannies.

(January 25, 2014 at 9:16 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 25, 2014 at 9:11 pm)TaraJo Wrote: I'm not the one suggesting a eugenics program.

Eugenics does not have to involve killing anyone.

Selective sterilization isn't much better.

But, for the case of argument, would you object to starting this eugenics program by selectively sterilizing the Jews?

(January 25, 2014 at 9:28 pm)TaraJo Wrote:

(January 25, 2014 at 9:16 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: Eugenics does not have to involve killing anyone.

Selective sterilization isn't much better.

But, for the case of argument, would you object to starting this eugenics program by selectively sterilizing the Jews?

Yes. I would be opposed to the sterilization of anyone based on ethnicity.

---

(January 25, 2014 at 9:23 pm)BrokenQuill92 Wrote: Raptor stop putting your foot in your mouth and trying to discuss things you most certainly don't understand. Go play Call of Duty or something.

No, you clearly don't understand that not all eugenics involves killing people.

(January 25, 2014 at 9:29 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 25, 2014 at 9:28 pm)TaraJo Wrote: Selective sterilization isn't much better.

But, for the case of argument, would you object to starting this eugenics program by selectively sterilizing the Jews?

Yes. I would be opposed to the sterilization of anyone based on ethnicity.

And therin lies another problem with eugenics: everyone insists their group doesn't need any purging, but we need to get the baddies out of all the other groups.

And that doesn't even start to go into the horrible history of Eugenics in practical use. Watch the video that BrokenQuill posted if you want to hear about it.

Past that, anarchism could, potentially work, in small communities. As long as the group is small enough for everyone to know each other, anarchism (and communism) can work. Once the group gets large enough that people might not all know each other, people start turning back into people... and people can be kinda shitty.