(January 29, 2014 at 5:59 pm)Ivy Wrote: Ego, you need to stop insulting the women around here, or I will lose all kind efforts to explain things nicely. Making up labels just because a woman believes she has rights over her own body is very ignorant. Stop it.

I never said a woman doesn't have rights over her body. I said people have the right to sex with consenting partners & that you don't have the right to censor what people say about your body.

Who said anything about banning it? I said it was rude. There are rules at school, which are in place to teach young people how to get along in society. Rudeness doesn't do people well out in the big bad world. Therefore, rudeness is punished.

---

(January 29, 2014 at 6:00 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 5:59 pm)Ivy Wrote: Ego, you need to stop insulting the women around here, or I will lose all kind efforts to explain things nicely. Making up labels just because a woman believes she has rights over her own body is very ignorant. Stop it.

I never said a woman doesn't have rights over her body. I said people have the right to sex with consenting partners & that you don't have the right to censor what people say about your body.

Who's saying people don't have the right to have sex with consenting partners? And what in the sam hill does that have to do with feminism?

(January 29, 2014 at 5:53 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 5:48 pm)Beccs Wrote: Depends on the level of expression. I have no problem with people looking at me, so long as they don't become obsessive about it (following around, etc). I have no problem with flirting - we all do it. But "not interested" means just that and unwanted touching will get a response from being told to fuck off or, in extreme situations, a kick to the groin (in social situations) or told to fuck off and then an harassment complaint (in a work/business situation).

I kid I know got in huge trouble for telling a teacher she had nice tits. Absolutely ridiculous PC fascism.

ANd so he should have. The same if any kid said a male teacher had a nice dick.

Inappropriate - especially from a kid in a school situation.

(January 29, 2014 at 6:02 pm)Beccs Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 5:53 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: I kid I know got in huge trouble for telling a teacher she had nice tits. Absolutely ridiculous PC fascism.

ANd so he should have. The same if any kid said a male teacher had a nice dick.

Inappropriate - especially from a kid in a school situation.

No, society should have an open attitude about sex. You are clearly a prude in need of re-education.

---

(January 29, 2014 at 6:00 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Who said anything about banning it? I said it was rude. There are rules at school, which are in place to teach young people how to get along in society. Rudeness doesn't do people well out in the big bad world. Therefore, rudeness is punished.

---

(January 29, 2014 at 6:00 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: I never said a woman doesn't have rights over her body. I said people have the right to sex with consenting partners & that you don't have the right to censor what people say about your body.

Who's saying people don't have the right to have sex with consenting partners? And what in the sam hill does that have to do with feminism?

You did. You are the one who said society does not have the responsibility of sexually fulfilling all its members.

(January 29, 2014 at 6:05 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 6:02 pm)Beccs Wrote: ANd so he should have. The same if any kid said a male teacher had a nice dick.

Inappropriate - especially from a kid in a school situation.

No, society should have an open attitude about sex. You are clearly a prude in need of re-education.

Not being allowed to make sexualizing remarks about your schoolteacher makes you a prude? You must have a pretty low bar for what counts as prude.

---

(January 29, 2014 at 6:05 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 6:00 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Who's saying people don't have the right to have sex with consenting partners? And what in the sam hill does that have to do with feminism?

You did. You are the one who said society does not have the responsibility of sexually fulfilling all its members.

Society doesn't. If no one wants to have sex with you, that's your loss. That isn't stopping it from happening consensually, but barring consent, you aren't entitled to anything in that regard. It is no wonder that you can't find anyone, going about with this entitled attitude of yours.

Ego, a bit of advice: If you don't smarten up and drop these attitudes you have about females in general and feminists in particular, you're going to have about as much luck getting laid as a giraffe has of sneaking into a rhinoceros convention by wearing a false mustache.

Boru

I seriously think there's something wrong with you, ego.

(January 29, 2014 at 6:10 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: I seriously think there's something wrong with you, ego.

You are the one with the degeneracy know as feminism.

(January 29, 2014 at 6:05 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 6:02 pm)Beccs Wrote: ANd so he should have. The same if any kid said a male teacher had a nice dick.

Inappropriate - especially from a kid in a school situation.

No, society should have an open attitude about sex. You are clearly a prude in need of re-education.

Ego, no name calling. In my opinion, you are near flaming, if not already there.

If everything was allowed and no boundaries were established, safety would be very difficult to establish. This is why people need to respect the intimacy of others.

Also, typical feminist claim. Anyone who doesn't submit to PC tyranny has something wrong with them. It is no different than the USSR's abuse of psychiatry.