(February 21, 2014 at 2:42 pm)KUSA Wrote: The truth comes out. This is simply part of a leftist agenda.

[rolls eyes]

(February 21, 2014 at 2:27 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote:

(February 21, 2014 at 2:20 pm)KUSA Wrote: If you want to lower deaths from cancer then put this technology on a cigarette lighter. That way the wrong person can't light it.
As for your car you can put a breathalizer on it any time you want.

And if we want to drastically reduce gun deaths, the solution is, apparently, to ban them altogether.

That probably won't work here, though. One need only look at this thread to see what even the suggestion of a safety/security device, designed more to protect the owner than anything else, does to some people.

No! You can't ban guns! Guns are a part of our freedom, do you hate freedom? The second amendment is there for a reason. The solution is more guns, not less!

(February 21, 2014 at 4:07 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:

(February 21, 2014 at 2:27 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: And if we want to drastically reduce gun deaths, the solution is, apparently, to ban them altogether.

That probably won't work here, though. One need only look at this thread to see what even the suggestion of a safety/security device, designed more to protect the owner than anything else, does to some people.

No! You can't ban guns! Guns are a part of our freedom, do you hate freedom? The second amendment is there for a reason. The solution is more guns, not less!

I agree, more guns are needed. Just not those pussy battery operated ones.

We need more of these.

Thats all I need is to forget the dam watch... get robbed and the gun dont work.. then get pistol whipped like a red headed stepchild. .

(February 21, 2014 at 5:25 pm)truthBtold Wrote: Thats all I need is to forget the dam watch... get robbed and the gun dont work.. then get pistol whipped like a red headed stepchild. .

If I owned one of these I would tape the watch to the gun.

(February 21, 2014 at 5:26 pm)KUSA Wrote:

(February 21, 2014 at 5:25 pm)truthBtold Wrote: Thats all I need is to forget the dam watch... get robbed and the gun dont work.. then get pistol whipped like a red headed stepchild. .

If I owned one of these I would tape the watch to the gun.

I would tape the gun to the watch.. ahhhh!!

(February 21, 2014 at 2:42 pm)KUSA Wrote: The truth comes out. This is simply part of a leftist agenda.

I'm highlighting a method to make guns safer, so it should have been obvious from the start I wasn't going to suggest a conservative-approved idea.

(February 21, 2014 at 6:13 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: I'm highlighting a method to make guns safer

This gun is less safe. If the battery dies I might die.

(February 21, 2014 at 6:17 pm)KUSA Wrote: This gun is less safe. If the battery dies I might die.

Der, well if you run out of ammo then you might die too, but I don't see you campaigning for guns that never run dry!

Not that I'm expecting much rational conversation from someone who unironically uses the phrase "leftist agenda," but that's an extension of the logic you were using earlier.

(February 21, 2014 at 10:13 pm)Esquilax Wrote:

(February 21, 2014 at 6:17 pm)KUSA Wrote: This gun is less safe. If the battery dies I might die.

Der, well if you run out of ammo then you might die too, but I don't see you campaigning for guns that never run dry! :rolleyes:

Not that I'm expecting much rational conversation from someone who unironically uses the phrase "leftist agenda," but that's an extension of the logic you were using earlier.

This thread stinks of leftist agenda. Read the thread title. It says "making this a REQUIRED safety feature".

I really don't give a rats ass if some pantywaist wants to own this garbage. However making it required is not cool.