So he is saying that if god knows what my choices are gonna be I am still free cause I can do otherwise. And how am I going to do that?

This omniscience thing is pretty straight forward. If god knows I will do X I can't not do X. I see no flaw in the argument.

If you were to know (absolutely) that your neighbor was going to go to work tomorrow- how would that affect him?
Same principle.

(March 31, 2014 at 8:56 pm)professor Wrote: If you were to know (absolutely) that your neighbor was going to go to work tomorrow- how would that affect him?
Same principle.

Cheese anyone?

You'd catch more theists with sheep feed.

You will never catch a mouse with that devise. It lacks a few things.

(March 31, 2014 at 9:07 pm)professor Wrote: You will never catch a mouse with that devise. It lacks a few things.

Like ambiguity?

(March 31, 2014 at 8:56 pm)professor Wrote: If you were to know (absolutely) that your neighbor was going to go to work tomorrow- how would that affect him?
Same principle.

Depends. I could do a lot to help him out, or prevent a tragedy. In fact, in possession of such knowledge and power, I would feel compelled to use them in such a manner.

Vote Ryantology for God of the Universe.

You guys are unreal.
Foreknowledge does not mean planned interference.
You are insinuating that you are victims, some kind of chess figure on the board.
Baloney.

(March 31, 2014 at 9:17 pm)professor Wrote: You guys are unreal.

Perhaps... define 'real'.

I just illustrated an obvious logic trap

It is just a phrase we use when something is beyond logic.