Me + this thread =

Anyone else ready to move of to Rev's second argument so we can speed up him leaving the forums?

(April 23, 2014 at 11:44 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote: Anyone else ready to move of to Rev's second argument so we can speed up him leaving the forums?

Let him stay, but I'd like to see the other arguments with a bit higher frequency...
One a day would be nice, but I guess rev would be overwhelmed with all the replies from each thread.

(April 23, 2014 at 11:46 am)pocaracas Wrote:

(April 23, 2014 at 11:44 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote: Anyone else ready to move of to Rev's second argument so we can speed up him leaving the forums?

Let him stay, but I'd like to see the other arguments with a bit higher frequency...
One a day would be nice, but I guess rev would be overwhelmed with all the replies from each thread.

Why overwhelmed? It's as easy to ignore 100 replies as it is to ignore one, and that appears to be all he's doing. Well, that plus occasionally dropping in some mindless assertions and empty platitudes.

(April 23, 2014 at 11:59 am)Thackerie Wrote:

(April 23, 2014 at 11:46 am)pocaracas Wrote: Let him stay, but I'd like to see the other arguments with a bit higher frequency...
One a day would be nice, but I guess rev would be overwhelmed with all the replies from each thread.

Why overwhelmed? It's as easy to ignore 100 replies as it is to ignore one, and that appears to be all he's doing. Well, that plus occasionally dropping in some mindless assertions and empty platitudes.

Aye considering even the other theological nut bags have left him with out aid

(April 23, 2014 at 11:59 am)Thackerie Wrote:

(April 23, 2014 at 11:46 am)pocaracas Wrote: Let him stay, but I'd like to see the other arguments with a bit higher frequency...
One a day would be nice, but I guess rev would be overwhelmed with all the replies from each thread.

Why overwhelmed? It's as easy to ignore 100 replies as it is to ignore one, and that appears to be all he's doing. Well, that plus occasionally dropping in some mindless assertions and empty platitudes.

He seems to read everything... but is very selective as to what he replies... and he replies in a strange order...
Some people are weird that way...

How about we distinguish all pertinent responses to Rev with purple font. We can use normal color font as we talk amongst eachother, and Rev can just focus on the purple.

(April 21, 2014 at 10:03 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:

(April 21, 2014 at 10:43 am)max-greece Wrote: However that hypothesis can be eliminated due to the fact that 99.8% of all of the species that have ever lived have now gone extinct.

In other words - the level of intelligence evidenced in the design is too low to be worthy of consideration.

Unless your God is dumber that a bag of dead squirrels, that is.

I highly doubt the level of intelligence of a species will decide or not if they become extinct. I also don't understand how extinction supports evolution?

Nature is indifferent to the survival of species, hence a high rate of extinction. If an insufficient number of individuals within a species are able to pass on their genes, the species goes extinct. It could be just bad luck, like a species that only lives on one side of a particular mountain and is wiped out when the mountain turns out to be a volcano. Other species are also part of the 'reproductive fitness landscape' of a species, extinctions alter the course of evolution.

(April 23, 2014 at 12:22 pm)Coffee Jesus Wrote: How about we distinguish all pertinent responses to Rev with purple font. We can use normal color font as we talk amongst eachother, and Rev can just focus on the purple.

I second that motion.

(April 21, 2014 at 10:03 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: If it supported your view then it would be right?

Only if it supported my view with correct facts and reasoning.

Did we ever get an argument or evidence from a reliable unbiased source that there are no transitional fossils, to respond to the clear demonstration there are many transitional fossils?

If no, can we agree this argument has been an utter failure and poorly researched at that?

Id like to see the next argument, and it seems like rev is out of steam and just tossing assertions out with nothing to back them up.