The believers will only say that the book was there to test the faithful, you just can't beat them.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 3, 2024, 5:46 pm
Thread Rating:
JC wasn't crucified, says 1500-year-old bible
|
(April 28, 2014 at 7:44 pm)Stimbo Wrote: 1500 Year Old Bible Confirms That Jesus Christ Was Not Crucified – Vatican In AweSomething that old there's no telling who wrote it. In recent years they have found a number of things like that of Jesus' brother James, his sarcophagus was supposedly found.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
What's that? A contradictory account of god's word?
Whoever has heard of such a thing before?! Seriously, this isn't gonna change anything, any more than all the other contradictions, in all the other books have.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! (April 28, 2014 at 8:39 pm)strawdawg Wrote:(April 28, 2014 at 7:44 pm)Stimbo Wrote: 1500 Year Old Bible Confirms That Jesus Christ Was Not Crucified – Vatican In AweSomething that old there's no telling who wrote it. In recent years they have found a number of things like that of Jesus' brother James, his sarcophagus was supposedly found. We found documents in 1945 stating clearly that date as early as 2 C.E. that state things like Jesus was married, that still aren't taken seriously. They're studied by the Vatican, and religious scholars worldwide as historic texts, yet have had little or no effect on doctrine. (April 28, 2014 at 9:13 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote:(April 28, 2014 at 8:39 pm)strawdawg Wrote: Something that old there's no telling who wrote it. In recent years they have found a number of things like that of Jesus' brother James, his sarcophagus was supposedly found. What do you expect? There's no profit in upsetting the apple cart. JC wasn't crucified, says 1500-year-old bible
April 28, 2014 at 9:24 pm
(This post was last modified: April 28, 2014 at 9:26 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
I dunno. But knowing about the historic Gnostics, Illuminati and Rosicrucians (I was absolutely fascinated in college, and lucky to have a professor M.A.'d in the history of religion and philosophy) it's almost as irritating to hear the batshit crazy modern conspiracy theories as it is to be accused of believing in them by people who have absolutely no idea the historic Gnostics were a very real sect with equally tenable contributions to doctrine.
Then again, most people know "virgin birth" was a mistranslation, and that hasn't changed their beliefs at all. (April 28, 2014 at 8:30 pm)psychoslice Wrote: The believers will only say that the book was there to test the faithful, you just can't beat them. I have learned that you cannot argue with a christian. Anyone who can throw the word "MAGIC" around cannot be reasoned with. Like muttering to a brick wall, it will get you no where
Now how do I subtly get this bit of information to Christian family members without me sending them the link. Need to shake things up a bit.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)