Posts: 6946
Threads: 26
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
83
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:01 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 8:00 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I have faith in God's Word and what He say is truth. Perhaps you never have seen a subatomic particle but you have faith that they are real. So you see, we both have faith.
This dude is hopeless.
Posts: 35273
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:03 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 8:00 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 7:34 pm)Stimbo Wrote: How would you distinguish faith in something real from faith in the nonexistent?
I have faith in God's Word and what He say is truth. Perhaps you never have seen a subatomic particle but you have faith that they are real. So you see, we both have faith.
We can see and predict the effects of subatomic particles.
Not so deities.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:04 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 7:18 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 6:34 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: How did you get a red name?
Goddidit.
You guys are obviously making sport of me instead of addressing my argument.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:05 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 8:00 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 7:34 pm)Stimbo Wrote: How would you distinguish faith in something real from faith in the nonexistent?
I have faith in God's Word and what He say is truth. Perhaps you never have seen a subatomic particle but you have faith that they are real. So you see, we both have faith.
Wrong again.
http://io9.com/the-first-image-ever-of-a...-509684901
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:05 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 7:26 pm)Bad Wolf Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 7:20 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: Please refrain from using foul language..thanks. 
Don't tell me what to do fuck face
Let's get along and show mutual respect mate. 
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:06 pm
(This post was last modified: May 5, 2014 at 8:09 pm by Jackalope.)
(May 5, 2014 at 8:04 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 7:18 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Goddidit.
You guys are obviously making sport of me instead of addressing my argument.
Wrong. You made no argument. You made a *claim*, backed by (woefully outdated) opinion. ...and even worse, you dishonestly quote mined the author.
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:08 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 7:13 pm)Chuck Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 7:11 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: Invite Mr. HEYWORD to the thread. If you evolution is changes that take place over time within species that I accept that.
No, My evolution is the continuous and on-going creation of new species from the very first species to have ever existed, in a world that has no god.
What you accept is irrelevent. "Mr" Heywood is a posturing moron. He only seems smart to you because you are, incredible as it may seem, really even dumber than he.
(May 5, 2014 at 7:13 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I don't understand, I got that from Ben Stein's documentary. Why can't I refer to a documentary? How is that breaking the rules?
Because Ben is a lying moron whose purpose is not to report science, but to discredit science. Not for the correctness of science, but for what he imagined to be the negative effects of science independent of whether scientific discovery is valid or not.
Why do you believe everyone who believes in God is an imbecilic moron? Is it possible, that someone who believes in no god is not intelligent? 
Posts: 6946
Threads: 26
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
83
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:11 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 8:08 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: Why do you believe everyone who believes in God is an imbecilic moron?
Intelligent theists do exist; however, based on your interaction here you cannot be counted among them.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:12 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 7:38 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: God loves me even if you think I am simple minded. God loves you too even though your pride may getting in the way of you repenting. Anyways, God shows His creative work to us everyday. He did a great job.
What does any of this have to do with "Evolution of the Species"?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 35273
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 5, 2014 at 8:12 pm
(May 5, 2014 at 8:08 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (May 5, 2014 at 7:13 pm)Chuck Wrote: No, My evolution is the continuous and on-going creation of new species from the very first species to have ever existed, in a world that has no god.
What you accept is irrelevent. "Mr" Heywood is a posturing moron. He only seems smart to you because you are, incredible as it may seem, really even dumber than he.
Because Ben is a lying moron whose purpose is not to report science, but to discredit science. Not for the correctness of science, but for what he imagined to be the negative effects of science independent of whether scientific discovery is valid or not.
Why do you believe everyone who believes in God is an imbecilic moron? Is it possible, that someone who believes in no god is not intelligent?
I don't think everyone who believs in a deity is a moron.
I will be honest and say I think people who promote creations, in particular YECS, and those who follow Ken Ham, Ray Comfort, and their ilk are ignorant, dense, uneducated, and/or utterly dishonest.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
|
