These are republicunts you're dealing with. The same people who, when Wolf Blitzer, moderating a "debate" asked Ron Paul what should happen to a 30 year old who does not have health insurance and pressed him by saying "should we let him die?" cheered. Now Paul didn't say "let him die" he didn't say much of anything which was what prompted Blitzer to press him but the cheers of the crowd spoke volumes about what a despicable bunch of motherfuckers makes up the republicunt base.

(May 21, 2014 at 6:29 pm)Heywood Wrote: Mini....I'd rather be dumb then be a bitter old man like you who has wasted his entire life hating others.

Well, then - it's fortunate that you are.

(June 1, 2014 at 4:10 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Really, asswipe? An "accident?"

I have noticed that sometimes, when someone wants to minimize a crime, they refer to it as an "accident" or "mistake." It's particularly insulting when it's used to rationalize violent crimes like rape. There have been college football players who referred to acts like armed robbery or sexual assault as "a mistake." I'm sorry, son, but misspelling your name on a form is a mistake. Rape isn't something that happens as an accidental side-effect of trying to tie your shoe or buy an ice cream, you stupid fuck. It's an action you performed deliberately, and it's a crime.

There are multiple forms of rape, guys.

Be more specific.

I doubt any of them are "accidental."

18 year olds have been charged with statutory rape due to consensual sex with 17 year olds.

So much so we needed "Romeo and Juliet" laws.

A significant number were not committed with the intent to "rape" in mind, yet fall under the conditions, thus making it
'accidental'

Wanna re-evaluate your statement, Min?

Be wary of falling under the sway of reductionism that characterizes most Republicunts.