(June 6, 2014 at 7:43 am)Ksa Wrote:

(June 5, 2014 at 8:09 pm)Godschild Wrote: You threatening me little one.

GC

It's not a threat man, it's called oral sex. Good stuff. I guess it's a threat to you tho, cause you no longer go to paradise or that zoo or whatever God built for gud boi like you

So now you're gay bashing, what an idiot.

(June 6, 2014 at 12:14 pm)Godschild Wrote:

(June 6, 2014 at 7:43 am)Ksa Wrote: It's not a threat man, it's called oral sex. Good stuff. I guess it's a threat to you tho, cause you no longer go to paradise or that zoo or whatever God built for gud boi like you

So now you're gay bashing, what an idiot.

I would seriously love to know how you arrived at that conclusion.

(June 6, 2014 at 12:16 pm)Cato Wrote:

(June 6, 2014 at 12:14 pm)Godschild Wrote: So now you're gay bashing, what an idiot.

I would seriously love to know how you arrived at that conclusion.

Huh. That's funny. When someone else mentions homosexual sex, it's "gay bashing." When GC mentions sinful atheist homosexuals and their godless homosexual abominable nature, it's "protected religious expression."

(June 6, 2014 at 12:33 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote:

(June 6, 2014 at 12:16 pm)Cato Wrote: I would seriously love to know how you arrived at that conclusion.

Huh. That's funny. When someone else mentions homosexual sex, it's "gay bashing." When GC mentions sinful atheist homosexuals and their godless homosexual abominable nature, it's "protected religious expression."

Depends on which side of the issue one stands.

---

(June 6, 2014 at 12:16 pm)Cato Wrote:

(June 6, 2014 at 12:14 pm)Godschild Wrote: So now you're gay bashing, what an idiot.

I would seriously love to know how you arrived at that conclusion.

Because he meant it as derogatory action toward someone who he knew was opposed to gay actions. Makes him a real dip.

(June 6, 2014 at 1:23 pm)Godschild Wrote:

(June 6, 2014 at 12:33 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: Huh. That's funny. When someone else mentions homosexual sex, it's "gay bashing." When GC mentions sinful atheist homosexuals and their godless homosexual abominable nature, it's "protected religious expression."

Depends on which side of the issue one stands.

Human rights are independent of your political views.

---

(June 6, 2014 at 1:23 pm)Godschild Wrote:

(June 6, 2014 at 12:16 pm)Cato Wrote: I would seriously love to know how you arrived at that conclusion.

Because he meant it as derogatory action toward someone who he knew was opposed to gay actions. Makes him a real dip.

Only it wasn't, he was talking about stuffing a dick in your mouth because he knows you're afraid of homosexuals.

Example:

(June 6, 2014 at 1:31 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote:

(June 6, 2014 at 1:23 pm)Godschild Wrote: Because he meant it as derogatory action toward someone who he knew was opposed to gay actions. Makes him a real dip.

Only it wasn't, he was talking about stuffing a dick in your mouth because he knows you're afraid of homosexuals.

Afraid of homosexuals, why would I be they are no threat to me. That's exactly what I'm saying he used a homosexual act as a tool to run someone down, that is using the gays for his ammunition, seems to me he has no respect or use for the gay community, other than to use them as ammunition. Defending such a dip makes you just as bad.

(June 6, 2014 at 3:36 pm)Godschild Wrote: Afraid of homosexuals, why would I be they are no threat to me. That's exactly what I'm saying he used a homosexual act as a tool to run someone down, that is using the gays for his ammunition, seems to me he has no respect or use for the gay community, other than to use them as ammunition. Defending such a dip makes you just as bad.

I'm willing to bet that more cock is sucked as a heterosexual act than as a homosexual act.

(June 6, 2014 at 3:41 pm)Cato Wrote:

(June 6, 2014 at 3:36 pm)Godschild Wrote: Afraid of homosexuals, why would I be they are no threat to me. That's exactly what I'm saying he used a homosexual act as a tool to run someone down, that is using the gays for his ammunition, seems to me he has no respect or use for the gay community, other than to use them as ammunition. Defending such a dip makes you just as bad.

I'm willing to bet that more cock is sucked as a heterosexual act than as a homosexual act.

Not by the same gender.

(June 6, 2014 at 5:17 pm)Godschild Wrote:

(June 6, 2014 at 3:41 pm)Cato Wrote: I'm willing to bet that more cock is sucked as a heterosexual act than as a homosexual act.

Not by the same gender.

Yes, so many men sucking cock out there, and YOU failed to save them. God will ask you to account for their sins, like he asked Jesus. You think your God will just look at your good deeds and smile at you? Look what happened to Jesus! That man was sinless. You'll end up on a cross yourself trust me.

If your God punishes the sinners, why condone sin by punishing the one man who was sinless. Does that sound logical? Maybe God wants you to have anal sex. Maybe the Bible is a satire of what God wants. Maybe you got it all wrong.

You're right, GC, there is a tool in this discussion. But it's not being wielded by Ksa I'm afraid.