(June 14, 2014 at 9:26 pm)psychoslice Wrote: You may believe everything you read but I don't, that's the difference between you and me.

No, the difference is you do believe all the crap you read.

If you can be fooled so easily by ill thought throng and un-evidenced bullshit like fake moon landing conspiracies and anti-vaccination propaganda, then really, what point is there in talking to you?

Idiots like you always try and act as though you've somehow taken the intellectual high ground; as though your intellectual integrity is somehow better than those that disagree with your BS by virtue of the fact that you don't accept what has been evidenced and accepted to be correct

What you display isn't skepticism it's cynicism. And what's worse it's completely unfounded, and is often very dangerous.

(June 14, 2014 at 9:26 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: I don't have any real aggression towards you, Poc, but I do have aggression towards the crap people put on the internet.

Even a cursory look at Wikipedia would give you sourced material - cited, from .orgs with credibility. You can even find explanations for the conspiracy theories there. And before you badmouth Wiki: they don't put up with bullshit there. Not from homeopaths, not from truthers.

So, once more, I have to go look for it...
Ok, I did go in the wiki page and found it satisfactory.
Eye witness accounts galore... (all inside jobs )

Indeed we do stick together like crap. Reality tends to do that to you.

I apologize for making you type a short web address. I realize your fingers must have gone through some strain to get there. Of course, my assumption was that you were capable of making more dignified research already.

(June 15, 2014 at 7:22 am)thesummerqueen Wrote: I apologize for making you type a short web address. I realize your fingers must have gone through some strain to get there. Of course, my assumption was that you were capable of making more dignified research already.

Your apology is accepted.

(June 15, 2014 at 6:24 am)Stimbo Wrote: Indeed we do stick together like crap. Reality tends to do that to you.Yea your realtyY

Yea your reality.

Sorry, I don't have a link to the specific source but Phil Plait - from Bad Astronomy - did a video in which he debunks the moon landing doubters.

For a start, they placed mirrors on the moon which we're still bouncing lasers off.

(June 15, 2014 at 6:22 am)pocaracas Wrote:

(June 14, 2014 at 9:26 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: I don't have any real aggression towards you, Poc, but I do have aggression towards the crap people put on the internet.

Even a cursory look at Wikipedia would give you sourced material - cited, from .orgs with credibility. You can even find explanations for the conspiracy theories there. And before you badmouth Wiki: they don't put up with bullshit there. Not from homeopaths, not from truthers.

So, once more, I have to go look for it...
Ok, I did go in the wiki page and found it satisfactory.
Eye witness accounts galore... (all inside jobs )

Yea whatever, you believe what you want, I'll stick to my gut feeling and what I have read throughout the years, at least I don't insult you for believing what you believe, unlike some assholes here.

Are really still going on about whether or not we really did the moon landing?

---

I know! Let's debate if Elvis is alive!

(June 15, 2014 at 5:26 pm)Beccs Wrote: Sorry, I don't have a link to the specific source but Phil Plait - from Bad Astronomy - did a video in which he debunks the moon landing doubters.

For a start, they placed mirrors on the moon which we're still bouncing lasers off.

For another, the presence of foot prints, the descent module of the LEM, and the flag on the surface of the moon from Apollo 11 have recently been verified again by being photographed from lunar orbit.

Also, the Russians and Chinese have also successfully soft landed on the moon, sent photos from the moon, and thus confirmed the moon can be landed on by a heavy space craft, and the landing rockets won't blast out a crater, and the lander won't subside into puffy dust, and the surface of the moon looks an awfully lot like the photos sent back by Apollo 11 astronauts, and you can't see the stars in photos of the sky during lunar day for precisely the same reason why you can't see a firefly in a photograph of the a day on earth - dynamic range of the film is only 4 stops at most.

If the Russians and the Chinese have any doubts about Apollo 11, they would speak up.

---

(June 15, 2014 at 5:35 pm)BrokenQuill92 Wrote: Are really still going on about whether or not we really did the moon landing?

---

I know! Let's debate if Elvis is alive!

I think the lesson is it would take a man who can believe in the Apollo hoax theory to believe in the Christian god.