(June 21, 2014 at 5:56 pm)Arthur123 Wrote: It is when you kill someone who you are responsible for putting there in the first place.

No it is not

Godslayer Wrote:The gay abortion is immoral. But if someone would make that choice then they shouldn't be a dad anyway.

Here Godslayer is saying he thinks abortion on the basis of discrimination against gays is morally wrong and that those people shouldn't be parents.

Yet no one has picked up on this.

Makes me wonder about the motive of posters in this thread.

(June 21, 2014 at 7:05 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Here Godslayer is saying he thinks abortion on the basis of discrimination against gays is morally wrong and that those people shouldn't be parents.

Yet no one has picked up on this.

Makes me wonder about the motive of posters in this thread.

If the posts of an individual make you question the group, that says more about you than the group.

(June 21, 2014 at 6:13 pm)GalacticBusDriver Wrote:

(June 21, 2014 at 6:05 pm)JuliaL Wrote: Lots of cells are live, genetically human and capable of becoming adults with appropriate treatment. Why are you singling out the fertilized egg for your border between morally protected and not?

Because that's what he thinks gawd told him.

Oh yeah? And who told Him? (Euthyphro restated)

(June 21, 2014 at 7:05 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:

Godslayer Wrote:The gay abortion is immoral. But if someone would make that choice then they shouldn't be a dad anyway.

Here Godslayer is saying he thinks abortion on the basis of discrimination against gays is morally wrong and that those people shouldn't be parents.

Yet no one has picked up on this.

Makes me wonder about the motive of posters in this thread.

What should should we pick up on?

Godslayer has his own morals. Just like everyone else. I don't know if it's immoral, I don't really think it is. Either way, it's not my business why someone has an abortion.

(June 21, 2014 at 7:05 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:

Godslayer Wrote:The gay abortion is immoral. But if someone would make that choice then they shouldn't be a dad anyway.

Here Godslayer is saying he thinks abortion on the basis of discrimination against gays is morally wrong and that those people shouldn't be parents.

Yet no one has picked up on this.

Makes me wonder about the motive of posters in this thread.

He's entitled to his opinion. If he was seeking to impose his opinion on others, then wed have a problem.

As far as I can see, he isn't.

He's saying that people who abort gay babies shouldn't be allowed to be parents.

He's telling other people what to do.

Arthur isn't.

Arthur gets the grief.

Are you guys blind?

Arthur, what's a "moral truth"? Can you give me a few examples?

(June 21, 2014 at 7:28 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: He's saying that people who abort gay babies shouldn't be allowed to be parents.

He's telling other people what to do.

Arthur isn't.

Arthur gets the grief.

Are you guys blind?

Is he pushing for his opinion to have the force of law?

Perhaps he'd clear this up for us.

(June 21, 2014 at 7:28 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: He's saying that people who abort gay babies shouldn't be allowed to be parents.

He's telling other people what to do.

Arthur isn't.

Arthur gets the grief.

Are you guys blind?

All he's doing is stating his opinion. He believes that someone who would do that shouldn't be a dad. He's not arguing or debating it, it's just a simple statement of opinion. If you want to debate him about it, go ahead, but don't deny his right to have an opinion.