Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation:
60
RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 29, 2014 at 11:04 am
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2014 at 11:04 am by Mudhammam.)
(December 29, 2014 at 10:58 am)fr0d0 Wrote: I agree. It's only when you look further into the justifications of Thor and Loki that their possibility of existence fails. That's what a good concept is: possible. But in terms of the Bible, now wow, that is some factual history for ya.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
154
RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 29, 2014 at 11:07 am
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2014 at 11:17 am by robvalue.)
Sure, no you can't falsify a supernatural claim either, in general. If I say meta-wind is a necessary component of all real-wind movements, you can't prove me wrong. You can't prove me right either. That's why unfalsifiable claims are useless. You can make as many as you want, about anything. You cannot assign any sort of probability to it being true or false, as we have no experience of it. So the probability of anything to do with a supernatural God is unknown. Having no information does not mean that you know it's as likely as not. You don't even know if it possible it can exist at all.
If I claim I have a supernatural friend who could destroy the universe any time he wanted, and eats the meta-essence out of snooker balls, that's also unfalsifiable. Therefor, it's useless.
I'd like to do a little probability now, I used to be a maths teacher so SHUT UP and pay attention. Good. Wow, that never worked when I was a teacher.
I have a normal six sided die in a cup. I shake it all around nicely, then slam the cup down, with no one being able to see which way the dice has fallen. Including me.
Now I claim that the dice is showing a 6. This could be true, it could be false. No one can know, so they have to make up their own decision based on probability. But there are only two possibilities; it's a six, as I claim, or its not a six. Therefor, it's a 50/50 guess.
No it isn't. Two possibilities do not indicate a 50/50 split. In this case, you use what you know, your evidence, past experience and logic to determine that the probability the claim is true is 1/6. This is a clear cut situation, but it demonstrates the point.
Now, if someone is making a claim about something we don't understand, it's either right or wrong but we have no idea how to measure the probability. So saying it is 50 50 is just a guess. And an unhelpful guess which is almost certainly wrong.
I'm not continuing to debate, I have given up, but I thought that example may be useful.
Posts: 2344
Threads: 79
Joined: November 18, 2014
Reputation:
42
RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 29, 2014 at 11:09 am
(December 29, 2014 at 10:58 am)fr0d0 Wrote: I agree. It's only when you look further into the justifications of Thor and Loki that their possibility of existence fails. That's what a good concept is: possible.
Because there are modern followers of Norse paganism, I am gong to guess that they have tweaked their religion enough to make it seem plausible to them. Maybe I should have used Odin because there is a legend about him hanging for several days to bring knowledge to humans. He seems like a god that could fit in with modern beliefs quite nicely.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
154
RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 29, 2014 at 11:27 am
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2014 at 11:30 am by robvalue.)
Actually I'm gonna post a video I've used before because I think it's really relevant.
The correct answer to "Is it possible there is a God" is "I don't know". I don't know if it's possible. It might be possible. It might be impossible. Let Tracie Harris take it from here, I found this thought provoking. It takes the whole 50/50 thing to a new level.
http://youtu.be/LqNDrOxhZho
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 29, 2014 at 12:14 pm
(December 29, 2014 at 9:45 am)fr0d0 Wrote: [quote='downbeatplumb' pid='830775' dateline='1419855250']
The logical evidence is overwhelmingly in opposition to the existence of god. Quote:Stated but not explained. [bin]
No accepted current scientific theories posit a god as part of them.
As science is a dispassionate way of viewing the totality of existence then all the experts in every field that counts refute the idea that a god exists at all and the abrahamic god fails even as a vague possibility.
Its effects would have been too far reaching and deep but every time people looked for the proof none has been forth coming.
So theists go, " but ah its unknowable" or "ah its outside of time" or " ah we can't know the mind of god" all cop outs that let them cling to their bronze age beliefs.
You can safely bin the idea of a god.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 29, 2014 at 4:34 pm
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2014 at 4:42 pm by fr0d0.)
(December 29, 2014 at 11:07 am)robvalue Wrote: Sure, no you can't falsify a supernatural claim either, in general. If I say meta-wind is a necessary component of all real-wind movements, you can't prove me wrong. You can't prove me right either. That's why unfalsifiable claims are useless. You can make as many as you want, about anything. You cannot assign any sort of probability to it being true or false, as we have no experience of it. So the probability of anything to do with a supernatural God is unknown. Having no information does not mean that you know it's as likely as not. You don't even know if it possible it can exist at all.
If I claim I have a supernatural friend who could destroy the universe any time he wanted, and eats the meta-essence out of snooker balls, that's also unfalsifiable. Therefor, it's useless.
I'd like to do a little probability now, I used to be a maths teacher so SHUT UP and pay attention. Good. Wow, that never worked when I was a teacher.
I have a normal six sided die in a cup. I shake it all around nicely, then slam the cup down, with no one being able to see which way the dice has fallen. Including me.
Now I claim that the dice is showing a 6. This could be true, it could be false. No one can know, so they have to make up their own decision based on probability. But there are only two possibilities; it's a six, as I claim, or its not a six. Therefor, it's a 50/50 guess.
No it isn't. Two possibilities do not indicate a 50/50 split. In this case, you use what you know, your evidence, past experience and logic to determine that the probability the claim is true is 1/6. This is a clear cut situation, but it demonstrates the point.
Now, if someone is making a claim about something we don't understand, it's either right or wrong but we have no idea how to measure the probability. So saying it is 50 50 is just a guess. And an unhelpful guess which is almost certainly wrong.
I'm not continuing to debate, I have given up, but I thought that example may be useful.
You can't just conjure up any random notion and promote it royally to a coherent theory. That's the difference between everything else and the coherent God theory. That's what we're after. Time wasting not required.
Go stand in the corridor!
(December 29, 2014 at 11:09 am)Nope Wrote: (December 29, 2014 at 10:58 am)fr0d0 Wrote: I agree. It's only when you look further into the justifications of Thor and Loki that their possibility of existence fails. That's what a good concept is: possible.
Because there are modern followers of Norse paganism, I am gong to guess that they have tweaked their religion enough to make it seem plausible to them. Maybe I should have used Odin because there is a legend about him hanging for several days to bring knowledge to humans. He seems like a god that could fit in with modern beliefs quite nicely.
The important thing is that your concept hold water. If I can find any holes in it I'll dismiss it. It's quite easy really.
(December 29, 2014 at 12:14 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: No accepted current scientific theories posit a god as part of them.
I knew I could bank on science. Good call.
(December 29, 2014 at 12:14 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: As science is a dispassionate way of viewing the totality of existence then all the experts in every field that counts refute the idea that a god exists at all and the abrahamic god fails even as a vague possibility.
Science refutes God?! Evidence please! (I'll assume that you're lying unless you can prove otherwise)
(December 29, 2014 at 12:14 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Its effects would have been too far reaching and deep but every time people looked for the proof none has been forth coming. Yes of course. Evidence of the supernatural. Haha!
(December 29, 2014 at 12:14 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: So theists go, " but ah its unknowable" or "ah its outside of time" or " ah we can't know the mind of god" all cop outs that let them cling to their bronze age beliefs.
You can safely bin the idea of a god. On no evidence. Now you wouldn't want me to do that would you? That would be a double standard from you. Tsk tsk!
Posts: 68
Threads: 5
Joined: November 28, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 29, 2014 at 5:19 pm
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2014 at 5:20 pm by JesusChristLover.)
(December 25, 2014 at 6:09 pm)RonaldReagansGhost666 Wrote: We'll play by a few simple rules:
I. No personal attacks
II. No Threats of Eternal Damnation
III. You cannot use anecdotal evidence to support your claims (i.e. "My mother saw God when she had a near-death incident and she talked to Jesus")
I'll also play by a few rules. Just because you are an Atheist doesn't mean you get to set the platform for debate.
1. Yes, no personal attacks.
2. No Threats of Eternal Damnation, except where there is conclusive proof that it is deserved.
3. Unless the evidence has been presented with testable proof.
4. All rules of debate on this forum will supersede our above demands, if there is a conflict.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 29, 2014 at 6:00 pm
@ Rob
Finally had time to watch the video. Nice debunk of gnostic theism/ atheism. He said "stupid" har har
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
150
RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 29, 2014 at 6:14 pm
(December 29, 2014 at 5:19 pm)JesusChristLover Wrote: 2. No Threats of Eternal Damnation, except where there is conclusive proof that it is deserved.
Because you won't be able to resist and, really, it's your best argument. Hell, even you wouldn't believe this shit without a healthy fear of damnation. But how useful have you found it to warn atheists of damnation as a way of persuading them of God's existence?
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Any Theists on AF, I Challenge You to a Debate on the Existence of God
December 29, 2014 at 6:20 pm
(December 29, 2014 at 6:14 pm)whateverist Wrote: Hell, even you wouldn't believe this shit without a healthy fear of damnation. But how useful have you found it to warn atheists of damnation as a way of persuading them of God's existence?
Threatening with eternal damnation seems about as useful as aiming an empty water pistol at us.
|