(March 27, 2015 at 1:25 pm)robvalue Wrote: I would certainly second such a motion. I'm not going to say anything more to him now no matter what shit he throws around.

The problem with him mainly is because he doesn't stop and look over what he is going to put down and or read over it. And the fact is like say for instance if any of us was wrong we would go over our position and change it while he would still be there beating a dead horse.

(March 27, 2015 at 1:25 pm)robvalue Wrote: I would certainly second such a motion. I'm not going to say anything more to him now no matter what shit he throws around.

That's just having a heard mentality.

People can hear you.

I like "heard mentality", I may use it often in irritating ways.

Errr... Uhmm...

I have no idea what that meant but I'm sure it's cool

(March 27, 2015 at 1:07 pm)Judi Lynn Wrote: Wait... he's got a wife? Oh that poor woman.

Indeed he does. As I recall, her username was Drich's Wife (or something like that). She wasn't active for long, but her time here was kind of funny. She garnered more kudos and reps in that short time -- out of sympathy for having to put up with Drich -- than Drich could dream of getting, no matter how many GCs and Professors there were at AF to blow him for his nonsense.

Yeah, there's definitely a 'better half' in Drich's life, and it isn't Jesus.

(March 27, 2015 at 1:21 pm)dyresand Wrote: From now on lets all ignore Dirch's reply's.

I don't think that's how discussion forums work.

Either way, he has managed to completely derail the conversation. My bet as to what question made him so uncomfortable is that it was the one about his kids.

Sure. Well, everyone is of course free to do what they like. I'd never presume to tell anyone else what to do.

Modhat:

Ok, ok. You guys have had your fun. We can't go on like, this, though, or I'm going to have to warn everyone for spamming and trolling, including myself, and that would be exhausting.

Thank you.

/modhat

(March 27, 2015 at 1:31 pm)Norman Humann Wrote:

(March 27, 2015 at 1:21 pm)dyresand Wrote: From now on lets all ignore Dirch's reply's.

I don't think that's how discussion forums work.

Either way, he has managed to completely derail the conversation. My bet as to what question made him so uncomfortable is that it was the one about his kids.

It is that whole bit of "saving" children from hell. He put himself into position in saying the party that attacked Brakeman's child with religion was in the right when it was the complete opposite. Because you just don't proselytize to someone else's child you just don't. So when he really couldn't defend his position on that he derailed the thread.

Thank you.

Let's get back to how shitty it is to try and worm your beliefs into the minds of other peoples' kids. I propose it's very shitty, no matter what your agenda. The only possible exception I could think of is like asking them to call childline or something if you think they're being abused but you're probably better addressing the matter yourself.

<edited, apologies>