Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 23, 2024, 3:51 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(April 30, 2015 at 10:46 am)whateverist Wrote: No one is perfect but I prefer to leave banning up to the amateurs. Can't call our mods pro's because they aren't paid. Nonetheless, it is their call to make. If I thought the moderation here was done in a hack way I would prefer to find another forums.

I don't know why they don't tell us the specifics which made Creed's banning a permanent one but I assume it is a policy with a purpose, probably as much to protect Creed's privacy as his victim. Regardless it can't be very pleasant to ban someone we all know and like. So if they do so, it must have been consistent with the rules as they interpret them based on more evidence than the rest of us have available.
I know. I wasn't trying to insinuate that the mods acted unfairly. I was only holding out that maybe the offense was forgivable. It just sucks that one of the better members, it seemed to me, is gone for good, when we get so much garbage on here.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
[Image: keep-calm-and-i-m-not-telling-you-4.png]
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(April 30, 2015 at 10:54 am)Nestor Wrote:
(April 30, 2015 at 10:46 am)whateverist Wrote: No one is perfect but I prefer to leave banning up to the amateurs. Can't call our mods pro's because they aren't paid. Nonetheless, it is their call to make. If I thought the moderation here was done in a hack way I would prefer to find another forums.

I don't know why they don't tell us the specifics which made Creed's banning a permanent one but I assume it is a policy with a purpose, probably as much to protect Creed's privacy as his victim. Regardless it can't be very pleasant to ban someone we all know and like. So if they do so, it must have been consistent with the rules as they interpret them based on more evidence than the rest of us have available.
I know. I wasn't trying to insinuate that the mods acted unfairly. I was only holding out that maybe the offense was forgivable. It just sucks that one of the better members, it seemed to me, is gone for good, when we get so much garbage on here.

One of the hardest lessons to learn in life is that some of the most heinous shit people do to each other will never be visible to others outside of a situation unless those outsiders are told, or shown. And sometimes it's not worth doing because of privacy or respect. You can't always tell what people are capable of.

People were shocked when I told them about some of the things my ex said to me after our break up. "But he seems like such a good guy!" Yeah, well, even good guys fuck up (in Creed's case) or act up (in my ex's case) because of internal issues.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(April 30, 2015 at 10:54 am)Nestor Wrote: I know. I wasn't trying to insinuate that the mods acted unfairly. I was only holding out that maybe the offense was forgivable. It just sucks that one of the better members, it seemed to me, is gone for good, when we get so much garbage on here.

What is garbage to some, it's treasure to others. The issue was dealt with accordingly and we have a very good reason for that.

Can we please move on? Begging
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(April 30, 2015 at 12:18 pm)LastPoet Wrote:
(April 30, 2015 at 10:54 am)Nestor Wrote: I know. I wasn't trying to insinuate that the mods acted unfairly. I was only holding out that maybe the offense was forgivable. It just sucks that one of the better members, it seemed to me, is gone for good, when we get so much garbage on here.

What is garbage to some, it's treasure to others. The issue was dealt with accordingly and we have a very good reason for that.

Can we please move on? Begging
https://youtu.be/FsqJFIJ5lLs
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Dude. Please. Drop it.
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Well, you asked for it.

https://youtu.be/0zFAvzf0Mv0
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(April 30, 2015 at 10:46 am)whateverist Wrote: ...  If I thought the moderation here was done in a hack way I would prefer to find another forums.


That is a wise plan of action.


(April 30, 2015 at 10:46 am)whateverist Wrote: I don't know why they don't tell us the specifics which made ...'s banning a permanent one but I assume it is a policy with a purpose, probably as much to protect ...'s privacy as his victim.


I would imagine something along those lines.  And I think it is a good policy.  If the gory details were always made public, I would probably look for another forum, as per your idea above.  There is more than enough drama and contention without such things.


(April 30, 2015 at 10:46 am)whateverist Wrote:  Regardless it can't be very pleasant to ban someone we all know and like.  ...

The solution to that is simple;  Stop liking people, and then no one you like will ever be banned.



"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
@Nestor:

So, you are making a joke about it huh? Oh well, enjoy yourself, while you can :-S
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
As my mother always said, "Be careful what you wish for; it may come true". So, to know the facts is probably to be either very bored or disappointed, or to subject yourself to a little too much awkwardness.

The Christians are right about one thing. A little mystery is OK.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  i keep getting contradictory messages from staff rocinantexyz 12 3008 November 29, 2022 at 4:37 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  Dear Staff Silver 28 4991 February 5, 2019 at 8:12 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  What Does This Mean, Oh Staff? Minimalist 24 6309 July 15, 2017 at 1:35 am
Last Post: c172
  Staff Appreciation Thread Shell B 41 9336 December 4, 2016 at 3:21 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  blocking ex staff members Catholic_Lady 68 8258 November 17, 2016 at 12:10 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues pocaracas 283 38494 July 11, 2016 at 6:36 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Unable to log in to my account Mermaid 42 7246 March 30, 2016 at 8:07 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
Thumbs Up Kudos for such Great forums!! Orchids 24 6922 September 22, 2015 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: Losty
  Blueberry muffins and birthdays and other such things. Losty 13 4687 May 16, 2015 at 4:15 pm
Last Post: Dystopia
  Staff....Once The Strike Ends...Strange Error Message Minimalist 1 2147 April 5, 2015 at 6:13 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)