Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation:
60
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 30, 2015 at 10:54 am
(April 30, 2015 at 10:46 am)whateverist Wrote: No one is perfect but I prefer to leave banning up to the amateurs. Can't call our mods pro's because they aren't paid. Nonetheless, it is their call to make. If I thought the moderation here was done in a hack way I would prefer to find another forums.
I don't know why they don't tell us the specifics which made Creed's banning a permanent one but I assume it is a policy with a purpose, probably as much to protect Creed's privacy as his victim. Regardless it can't be very pleasant to ban someone we all know and like. So if they do so, it must have been consistent with the rules as they interpret them based on more evidence than the rest of us have available. I know. I wasn't trying to insinuate that the mods acted unfairly. I was only holding out that maybe the offense was forgivable. It just sucks that one of the better members, it seemed to me, is gone for good, when we get so much garbage on here.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Posts: 19644
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 30, 2015 at 10:55 am
Posts: 12586
Threads: 397
Joined: September 17, 2010
Reputation:
96
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 30, 2015 at 11:06 am
(April 30, 2015 at 10:54 am)Nestor Wrote: (April 30, 2015 at 10:46 am)whateverist Wrote: No one is perfect but I prefer to leave banning up to the amateurs. Can't call our mods pro's because they aren't paid. Nonetheless, it is their call to make. If I thought the moderation here was done in a hack way I would prefer to find another forums.
I don't know why they don't tell us the specifics which made Creed's banning a permanent one but I assume it is a policy with a purpose, probably as much to protect Creed's privacy as his victim. Regardless it can't be very pleasant to ban someone we all know and like. So if they do so, it must have been consistent with the rules as they interpret them based on more evidence than the rest of us have available. I know. I wasn't trying to insinuate that the mods acted unfairly. I was only holding out that maybe the offense was forgivable. It just sucks that one of the better members, it seemed to me, is gone for good, when we get so much garbage on here.
One of the hardest lessons to learn in life is that some of the most heinous shit people do to each other will never be visible to others outside of a situation unless those outsiders are told, or shown. And sometimes it's not worth doing because of privacy or respect. You can't always tell what people are capable of.
People were shocked when I told them about some of the things my ex said to me after our break up. "But he seems like such a good guy!" Yeah, well, even good guys fuck up (in Creed's case) or act up (in my ex's case) because of internal issues.
Posts: 18503
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation:
125
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 30, 2015 at 12:18 pm
(April 30, 2015 at 10:54 am)Nestor Wrote: I know. I wasn't trying to insinuate that the mods acted unfairly. I was only holding out that maybe the offense was forgivable. It just sucks that one of the better members, it seemed to me, is gone for good, when we get so much garbage on here.
What is garbage to some, it's treasure to others. The issue was dealt with accordingly and we have a very good reason for that.
Can we please move on? 
Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation:
60
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 30, 2015 at 1:52 pm
(April 30, 2015 at 12:18 pm)LastPoet Wrote: (April 30, 2015 at 10:54 am)Nestor Wrote: I know. I wasn't trying to insinuate that the mods acted unfairly. I was only holding out that maybe the offense was forgivable. It just sucks that one of the better members, it seemed to me, is gone for good, when we get so much garbage on here.
What is garbage to some, it's treasure to others. The issue was dealt with accordingly and we have a very good reason for that.
Can we please move on? https://youtu.be/FsqJFIJ5lLs
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Posts: 7085
Threads: 69
Joined: September 11, 2012
Reputation:
84
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 30, 2015 at 1:57 pm
Dude. Please. Drop it.
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation:
60
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 30, 2015 at 2:07 pm
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Posts: 3395
Threads: 43
Joined: February 8, 2015
Reputation:
33
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 30, 2015 at 2:08 pm
(April 30, 2015 at 10:46 am)whateverist Wrote: ... If I thought the moderation here was done in a hack way I would prefer to find another forums.
That is a wise plan of action.
(April 30, 2015 at 10:46 am)whateverist Wrote: I don't know why they don't tell us the specifics which made ...'s banning a permanent one but I assume it is a policy with a purpose, probably as much to protect ...'s privacy as his victim.
I would imagine something along those lines. And I think it is a good policy. If the gory details were always made public, I would probably look for another forum, as per your idea above. There is more than enough drama and contention without such things.
(April 30, 2015 at 10:46 am)whateverist Wrote: Regardless it can't be very pleasant to ban someone we all know and like. ...
The solution to that is simple; Stop liking people, and then no one you like will ever be banned.
"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Posts: 18503
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation:
125
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 30, 2015 at 2:11 pm
(This post was last modified: April 30, 2015 at 2:13 pm by LastPoet.
Edit Reason: oops
)
@Nestor:
So, you are making a joke about it huh? Oh well, enjoy yourself, while you can :-S
Posts: 10470
Threads: 165
Joined: May 29, 2013
Reputation:
53
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 30, 2015 at 2:13 pm
As my mother always said, "Be careful what you wish for; it may come true". So, to know the facts is probably to be either very bored or disappointed, or to subject yourself to a little too much awkwardness.
The Christians are right about one thing. A little mystery is OK.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
|
![[Image: keep-calm-and-i-m-not-telling-you-4.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=sd.keepcalm-o-matic.co.uk%2Fi%2Fkeep-calm-and-i-m-not-telling-you-4.png)
![[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1140.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn569%2Fthesummerqueen%2FUntitled2_zpswaosccbr.png)
