Well. I'm voting in November.

I'm walking to the polls.

I probably should have participated in the primaries. Probably the reason why Democratic candidates aren't interested in exercising their mandate to push progress is because they know they can depend on their base. No reason to appeal to us because we wouldn't vote Republican anyway. All they have to do is get 51 percent of the people supporting them and they are in.

I'll keep my ear to the ground for primaries from now on.

(September 12, 2010 at 10:32 am)Watson Wrote: Then revolution will occur, and the people will take back their country.

Don't hold your breath; it didn't happen last time. Have a look at the behaviour of the US government (and most others) throughout the depression,especially against unions.

The people do not start revolutions,they only die in them. Revolutions are fomented by a middle class which feels hard done by. The people are cannon fodder who realise the agenda of those with the most to gain..

(September 13, 2010 at 5:21 am)padraic Wrote:

(September 12, 2010 at 10:32 am)Watson Wrote: Then revolution will occur, and the people will take back their country.

Don't hold your breath; it didn't happen last time. Have a look at the behaviour of the US government (and most others) throughout the depression,especially against unions.

The people do not start revolutions,they only die in them. Revolutions are fomented by a middle class which feels hard done by. The people are cannon fodder who realise the agenda of those with the most to gain..

I'm not sure you understood what I meant by revolution...it's happened before in this country, and it can damn well happen again. There are already signs. Big changes are underway, and it will be interesting to watch things unfold in these next ten to twenty years.

(September 12, 2010 at 12:43 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:

(September 12, 2010 at 11:02 am)Shinylight Wrote: Socialism!

Or maybe just a return to capitalism, from our current state of corporate welfare.

Why don't we take good ideas from many forms of government and combine them. Besides, democratic socialism seems more appealing to me then capitalism, but what do I know anyways.

(September 13, 2010 at 3:10 pm)HeyItsZeus Wrote: Why don't we take good ideas from many forms of government and combine them. Besides, democratic socialism seems more appealing to me then capitalism, but what do I know anyways.

My dream system:

Capitalism with socialized medicine and a progressive tax structure that helps keep the middle class healthy.

(September 13, 2010 at 3:41 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:

(September 13, 2010 at 3:10 pm)HeyItsZeus Wrote: Why don't we take good ideas from many forms of government and combine them. Besides, democratic socialism seems more appealing to me then capitalism, but what do I know anyways.

My dream system:

Capitalism with socialized medicine and a progressive tax structure that helps keep the middle class healthy.

what about the underprivileged low class and the over privileged upper class?

(September 13, 2010 at 3:41 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:

(September 13, 2010 at 3:10 pm)HeyItsZeus Wrote: Why don't we take good ideas from many forms of government and combine them. Besides, democratic socialism seems more appealing to me then capitalism, but what do I know anyways.

My dream system:

Capitalism with socialized medicine and a progressive tax structure that helps keep the middle class healthy.

Why do you see a progressive tax structure as a good idea? I'm completely with you in terms of capitalism + public healthcare, but a flat rate tax system is fairer for everyone imo.

Quote:but a flat rate tax system is fairer for everyone imo.

Bullshit.

Propaganda from the rich fucks who are pushing this. Here's a clue. They are pushing it for THEIR benefit not the working class.

Since 1980 when that senile old fuck Reagan was elected the upper 1% have steadily increased their percentage of the wealth of America while the middle-class has been getting it shoved up their ass.


And please, don't give me this "the rich create jobs" horseshit. These CEO get paid for eliminating jobs and shipping them overseas where some Bangladeshi peon will work for a buck a day.

Meanwhile, they give the middle class a lot of phony issues ( gay rights, abortion, flag-burning, immigration, prayer in schools, "SOCIALISM!!!", etc., etc) to get them fired up. What far too many never seem to realize is that the same politicians who give them lip service on those bullshit issues are owned by the same corporate power structure which has been fucking them over for 30 years.

"Yeah - things will be fine if we just get rid of all the fucking Mexicans! Oh, what? My job is being sent to India. Well....at least there aren't any Mexicans around. Thank goodness for the Republican Party."

It is fairer in the sense that everyone is treated equally, as I believe they should be. The rich are taxed by the same percentage as the poor. The rich end up giving more (just as with progressive tax), but in a proportional way.

I don't mind if you support progressive taxation for your own personal reasons, but please do not pretend it is in any way "equal" or "fair".

I'd also ask how you think shipping jobs overseas isn't creating jobs. Of course it is creating them...just because they aren't in your particular country doesn't mean they aren't being created. There are people in Bangladesh that are very thankful for the jobs they have.

(September 13, 2010 at 5:53 pm)Tiberius Wrote: It is fairer in the sense that everyone is treated equally, as I believe they should be. The rich are taxed by the same percentage as the poor. The rich end up giving more (just as with progressive tax), but in a proportional way.

I don't mind if you support progressive taxation for your own personal reasons, but please do not pretend it is in any way "equal" or "fair".

I'd also ask how you think shipping jobs overseas isn't creating jobs. Of course it is creating them...just because they aren't in your particular country doesn't mean they aren't being created. There are people in Bangladesh that are very thankful for the jobs they have.

I don't support it because it's fair, I support it because the rich have more $$ to take, so let them take that $$, not the $$ of the people who can't even afford to feed their families. I support an environment where everyone can have a good life. Maybe your rich and that's why you don't give a fuck. I don't know but whatever, your opinion.