|
Artificial Children?
|
 (June 26, 2015 at 7:01 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote:What if the unborn child benefits from biorhythms while in utero, such as heartbeat?(June 26, 2015 at 6:24 pm)IATIA Wrote: This may be an issue of concern.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
It looks like a useful medical advance although this is not artificial babies.
Who cares what the religious right thinks? It isn't even a religious issue.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Albert Einstein 
It would be cool to have one of these in the living room for 9 months. The whole family could watch it grow. It would be like a super cool fish tank.
 
I don't see a moral question here. The thread cited shows a bunch of idiots arguing that if it's artificial it's not god's way and therefore wrong. I wonder if they feel that way about oxygen tents, vaccines, and antibiotics, not to mention surgery of any kind.
But, I wouldn't want to have one of the first few test babies unless I was infertile. It doesn't seem to take much in the way of drug use or odd eating patterns to mess up a fetus. And it's not just nutrients but also hormones that arrive through the placenta. I suspect there will be early problems. Besides, I actually enjoyed being pregnant.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
(June 26, 2015 at 8:09 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(June 26, 2015 at 8:06 pm)KUSA Wrote: We don't want to piss king Jesus off now do we? Oh come on and tell us. Get flippant with me. (June 26, 2015 at 8:17 pm)Jenny A Wrote: I don't see a moral question here. The thread cited shows a bunch of idiots arguing that if it's artificial it's not god's way and therefore wrong. I wonder if they feel that way about oxygen tents, vaccines, and antibiotics, not to mention surgery of any kind. The only sane person there (ASUK) basically asked that. The Christards pointed out the difference between fighting off illness (that was caused by sin) and undermining god's natural processes.  (June 26, 2015 at 8:09 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(June 26, 2015 at 8:06 pm)KUSA Wrote: We don't want to piss king Jesus off now do we? From that line of reasoning, would that not make a majority of the threads on this forum "non-starters"?
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion. -- Superintendent Chalmers Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things. -- Ned Flanders Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral. -- The Rev Lovejoy  (June 26, 2015 at 7:53 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:(June 26, 2015 at 7:01 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: What of surrogate mothers or women putting their babies up for adoption? In both cases, the child isn't bonding with the person who will be his or her mother...What if the unborn child benefits from biorhythms while in utero, such as heartbeat? What if it does?
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
