The "not all Muslims are terrorists" fallacy

[Fidel_Castronaut]

If you aren't willing to do that then stop whining because people are reacting to a problem that the West caused when it disrupted the peace and tranquility in their countries.

You would have used much less digital space if you said, "I have no fucking clue about Wahhabism".

Lol, "peace and tranquility".

[rado84]

So you've got one citation for a plurality of alleged crimes attributed to an entire population?

This is just one of many rape cases done by Arabs

And this is for you because you're obviously blind. When I have more time to spare, I'll dig out more articles for you to see how many they are and that they're not limited to just 1 or 2 persons.

[SofaKingHigh]

So you've got one citation for a plurality of alleged crimes attributed to an entire population?

This is just one of many rape cases done by Arabs

And this is for you because you're obviously blind. When I have more time to spare, I'll dig out more articles for you to see how many they are and that they're not limited to just 1 or 2 persons.

OK, so, there have been 10's, maybe 100's of rapes since these evil bastards have hit your shores.  Terrible, it really is, I feel for the victims and would do damage to the perpetrators if I had half the chance.

But advocating a slaughter of an entire group of people?  Have you ever studied history?  At all???

You're no better than those forcing themselves on young girls sweetheart, in fact, I'd say you were worse.

[TheRocketSurgeon]

Rape as a weapon of warfare is not limited to the Islamic State psychopaths.

It's well-documented in almost every aggressive war that has ever been fought. Susan Brownmiller did an excellent job of covering the subject in her 1975 book Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape.

Don't get me wrong, I think ISIL is a cancer caused by the brain virus that is Islamic fundamentalism... but they're not new, unique, or particularly clever. They're such clear psychopaths that Al Qaeda has cut ties with them. That should say all that needs to be said about their legitimacy and actual connection to Islam.

[houseofcantor]

There maybe a logical fallacy for this all ready, but here is my idea for this

This a logical fallacy commonly made when arguing against the actions of people that follow particular ideology where instead responding appropriately to the argument at hand, you make an erroneous assertion that the argument only applies to a small subset of people. For example

Me: islam is responsible for religious violence per capita then any other religion.
You: but not all Muslims are terrorists!.

"You" is a strawman.

[Lemonvariable72]

There maybe a logical fallacy for this all ready, but here is my idea for this

This a logical fallacy commonly made when arguing against the actions of people that follow particular ideology where instead responding appropriately to the argument at hand, you make an erroneous assertion that the argument only applies to a small subset of people. For example

Me: islam is responsible for religious violence per capita then any other religion.
You: but not all Muslims are terrorists!.

"You" is a strawman.

It's s curt example as I explained.

[houseofcantor]

"You" is a strawman.

It's s curt example as I explained.

Doesn't make it less of a strawman. Makes it a troll thread. But reading RS, CL, and Napoleon makes it a good read; the other guy, not so much.

[Thumpalumpacus]

So you've got one citation for a plurality of alleged crimes attributed to an entire population?

This is just one of many rape cases done by Arabs

And this is for you because you're obviously blind. When I have more time to spare, I'll dig out more articles for you to see how many they are and that they're not limited to just 1 or 2 persons.

... except that you didn't, you know, CITE any others ... dumbfuck.

Also, I notice you dodged my questions. Here, I'll repeat them again. Since you seem to have difficulty detecting hard questions, I've emboldened them:

As for the locals weaponing up, is that because there is danger, or is that because, like you, they harbor their own bigotries? Judging an entire population by the acts of one man is sloppy thinking, and although you're clearly willing to do that, I'm not. How many Bulgarian criminals are there in your country, and do you delight in the prospect of all Bulgarians being put to death for their acts?

Now, along with more citations, you'll need to answer those questions.

[Lemonvariable72]

It's s curt example as I explained.

Doesn't make it less of a strawman. Makes it a troll thread. But reading RS, CL, and Napoleon makes it a good read; the other guy, not so much.

Well that wasn't my intention. In truth the fallacy I am attempting to describe doesn't even apply to only Muslims. Just they use it most commonly. You could also apply it to people attempting to defend any number of groups such as fundamentalist Christianity or the kkk (don't read that as Muslims are like the kkk, many aren't)
Basically the fallacy is attempting to cover the actions of a given group under the silent majority, in cases where the silent majority is irrelevant.

[rado84]

dumbfuck

...is your mother.